Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings

Assessment

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 313-317

  Garb, Howard N ^a  

^a VA Healthcare VISN 4   (United States)

Author keywords

Projective test; Psychological test; Rorschach; Test; Validity

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERSONALITY TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RORSCHACH TEST;

EID: 0033257512     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107319119900600402     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for psychological and educational testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Archer, R. P., & Gordon, R. A. (1988). MMPI and Rorschach indices of schizophrenic and depressive diagnoses among adolescent inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 276-287.
3. Archer, R. P., & Krishnamurthy, R. (1997). MMPI-A and Rorschach indices related to depression and conduct disorder: An evaluation of the incremental validity hypothesis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 517-533.
4. Barendregt, J. T. (1961). Research in psychodiagnostics. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
5. Bilett, J. L., Jones, N. F., & Whitaker, L. C. (1982). Exploring schizophrenic thinking in older adolescents with the WAIS, Rorschach, and WIST. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 232-243.
6. Bornstein, R. F. (1999). Criterion validity of objective and projective dependency tests: A meta-analytic assessment of behavioral prediction. Psychological Assessment, 11, 48-57.
7. Bornstein, R. F., Bowers, K. S., & Robinson, K. J. (1995). Differential relationships of objective and projective dependency scores to self-reports of interpersonal life events in college student subjects. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 255-269.
8. Cochrane, C. T. (1972). Effects of diagnostic information on empathic understanding by the therapist in a psychotherapy analogue. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 359-365.
9. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage.
10. Dawes, R. M. (in press). Two methods for studying the incremental validity of a Rorschach variable. Psychological Assessment.
11. Exner, J. E., Jr. (1993). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (3rd. ed.). New York: Wiley.
12. Gadol, I. (1969). The incremental and predictive validity of the Rorschach test in personality assessments of normal, neurotic, and psychotic subjects. Dissertation Abstracts, 29, 3482-B. (University Microfilms No. 69-4469)
13. Garb, H. N. (1984). The incremental validity of information used in personality assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 641-655.
14. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Garb, H. N., Florio, C. M., & Grove, W. M. (1998). The validity of the Rorschach and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Results from meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 9, 402-404.
16. Garb, H. N., Florio, C. M., & Grove, W. M. (1999). The Rorschach controversy: Reply to Parker, Hunsley, and Hanson. Psychological Science, 10, 293-294.
17. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., & Nezworski, M. T. (1999). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., & Nezworski, M. T. (in press). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. [Letter to the editor]. Child Abuse & Neglect.
19. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Grove, W. M., & Stejskal, W. J. (1999). Towards a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Golden, M. (1964). Some effects of combining psychological tests on clinical inferences. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 440-446.
21. Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (in press). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment.
22. Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. M. (in press). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment.
23. Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Mintz, J., & Auerbach, A. (1988). Who will benefit from psychotherapy? New York: Basic Books.
24. Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Luborsky, E., McLellan, A. T., Woody, G., & Alexander, L. (1993). Psychological health-sickness (PHS) as a predictor of outcomes in dynamic and other psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 542-548.
25. Luborsky, L., Mintz, J., & Christoph, P. (1979). Are psychotherapeutic changes predictable? Comparison of a Chicago Counseling Center project with a Penn Psychotherapy Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 469-473.
26. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Kubiszyn, T. W., Moreland, K. L., Eisman, E. J., & Dies, R. R. (1998). Benefits and costs of psychological assessment in health-care delivery: Report of the Board of Professional Affairs, Psychological Assessment Work Group, Part I. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Meyer, G. J., & Handler, L. (1997). The ability of the Rorschach to predict subsequent outcome: A meta-analysis of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 1-38.
28. Parker, K. C. H., Hanson, R., & Hunsley, J. (1988). MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A meta-analytic comparison of reliability, stability, and validity. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 367-373.
29. Parker, K. C. H., Hunsley, J., & Hanson, R. K. (1999). Old wine from old skins sometimes tastes like vinegar: A response to Garb, Florio, and Grove. Psychological Science, 10, 291-292.
30. Perez, F. I. (1976). Behavioral analysis of clinical judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 711-718.
31. Perry, W., Moore, D., & Braff, D. (1995). Gender differences on thought disturbance: Measures among schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1298-1301.
32. Perry, W., & Viglione, D. J., Jr. (1991). The Ego Impairment Index as a predictor of outcome in melancholic depressed patients treated with tricyclic antidepressants. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 487-501.
33. Potkay, C. R., & Ward, E. F. (1972). Clinical judgment under varied informational conditions: Rorschach, personal data, and best guess. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 513.
34. Sines, L. K. (1959). The relative contribution of four kinds of data to accuracy in personality assessment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 483-492.
35. West, M. M. (1998). Meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of projective techniques in discriminating child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1151-1166.
36. Wixom, J. (1989). The depressive experiences of adolescents with borderline personality disorder. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 5038B.
37. Wixom, J., Ludolph, P., & Westen, D. (1993). The quality of depression in adolescents with borderline personality disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 1172-1177.
38. Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Garb, H. N., & Nezworski, M. T. (1999). The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: A critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Stejskal, W. J. (1996a). The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7, 3-10.
40. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Stejskal, W. J. (1996b). Thinking critically about the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A reply to Exner. Psychological Science, 7, 14-17.