Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited)

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 137-145

  Ackerman, Marc J ^a,c,d,e   Ackerman, Melissa C ^b  

^a Wisconsin School of Professional Psychology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d Charter Behavioral Health Systems   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031492686     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.2.137     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Ackerman, M. J. (1995). A clinicians guide to child custody evaluations. New York: Wiley.
2. Ackerman, M. J., & Kane, A. W. (1993). Psychological experts in divorce, personal injury, and other civil actions (2nd ed.). Colorado Springs, CO: Wiley.
3. Ackerman, M. J., & O'Leary, U-M. (1995, August). The MMPI and MMPI-2 in child custody cases. Paper presented at the 103rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.
4. Ackerman, M. J., & Schoendorf, K. (1992). Ackerman-Schoendorf Scales for Parent Evaluation of Custody (ASPECT). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1997-1611.
6. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677-680.
7. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). (1994). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Family Conciliation Courts, 32, 504-513.
8. Bricklin, B. (1984). Bricklin Perceptual Scales. Furlong, PA: Village.
9. Brodzinsky, D. M. (1993). On the use and misuse of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 213-219.
10. Chasin, R., & Grunebaum, H. (1981). A model for evaluation in child custody. Journal of Divorce, 4(4), 57-67.
11. Clark, B. K. (1995). Acting in the best interest of the child: Essential components of a child custody evaluation. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 19-38.
12. Georgia Psychological Association. (1990). Recommendations for psychologists' involvement in child custody cases. Atlanta, GA: Author.
13. Gindes, M. (1995). Guidelines for child custody evaluations for psychologists: An overview and commentary. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 39-50.
14. Gordon R., & Peek, L. A. (1988). The custody quotient. Dallas, TX: Willmington Institute.
15. Jackson, A. M., Warner, N. S., Hornbein, R., Nelson, N., & Fortescue, E. (1980). Beyond the best interests of the child revisited. An approach to custody evaluations. Journal of Divorce, 3, 207-222.
16. Karras, D., & Berry, K. K. (1985). Custody evaluations: A critical review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 76-85.
17. Keilin, W. G., & Bloom, L. J. (1986). Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 338-346.
18. Landberg, G. (1982). Proposed model for the intervention of the mental health specialist in the resolution of difficult child custody disputes. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1, 309-318.
19. Nebraska Psychological Association. (1986). Guidelines for child custody evaluations. Lincoln, NE: Author.
20. New Jersey State Board of Psychological Examiners. (1993). Specialty guidelines for psychologists in custody/visitation evaluations. Newark, NJ: Author.
21. Oklahoma Psychological Association. (1988). Ethical guidelines for child custody evaluations. Oklahoma City, OK: Author.
22. Schutz, B. M., Dixon, E. B., Lindenberger, J. C., & Ruther, N. J. (1989). Solomon's sword: A practical guide to conducting child custody evaluations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Stahl, P. M. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations: A comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.