Precuing an isolated stimulus temporarily outweighs in-stream stimulus facilitation

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 167-182

  Hommuk, Karita ^a   Bachmann, Talis ^b,c   Oja, Andra ^a  

^a TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^c The Estonian Center of Behavioral and Health Sciences   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Flash lag effect; In stream facilitation; Masking; Rapid serial visual presentation; Spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 44849128635     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GENP.135.2.167-182     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bachmann, T., Luiga, I., Põder, E., & Kalev, K. (2003). Perceptual acceleration of objects in stream: Evidence from flash-lag displays. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 279-297.
2. Bachmann, T., & Oja, A. (2003). Flash-lag without change in feature space is alive and well at late intervals after stream onset. Perception, 35S, 126-127.
3. Bachmann, T., & Põder, E. (2001). Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 41, 1103-1106.
4. Bachmann, T., & Sikka, P. (2005). Perception of successive targets presented in invariant-item streams. Acta Psychologica, 120, 19-34.
5. Baldo, M. V. C., Kihara, A. H., Namba, J., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. Perception, 31, 17-30.
6. Blaser, E., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Holcombe, A. O. (2000, November 9). Tracking an object through feature space. Nature, 408, 196-199.
7. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2006). Visual masking. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. L. (1994, May 26). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
9. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000, March 17). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036-2038.
10. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001). The flash-lag illusion: Distinguishing a spatial from a temporal effect, and why that matters for interpreting visual physiology. Journal of Vision, 1, 16a.
11. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
12. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995, December 7). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature, 378, 566.
13. Mackeben, M., & Nakayama, K. (1993). Express attention shifts. Vision Research, 33, 85-90.
14. Moore, C. M., Egeth, H., Berglan, L. R., & Luck, S. J. (1996). Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 360-365.
15. Namba, J., & Baldo, M. V. C. (2003). The modulation of the flash-lag effect by voluntary attention. Perception, 33, 621-631.
16. Nijhawan, R. (1994, July 28). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370, 256-257.
17. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
18. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change blindness. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
19. Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-1360.
20. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional explanation. Psychological Research, 67, 184-197.
21. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
22. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 489-495.
23. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
24. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
25. Whitney, D., Cavanagh, P., & Murakami, I. (2000). Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Research, 40, 3829-3839.
26. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 137-149.