Effect of veneering method on the fracture and bond strength of bilayered zirconia restorations

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 237-240

  Aboushelib, Moustafa N ^a,b   De Kler, Marcel ^a   Van Der Zel, Jef M ^a   Feilzer, Albert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CLEARFIL SE BOND; IPS E.MAX PRESS; RESIN CEMENT; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 44849110240     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations: Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-863.
2. Vlaar ST, van der Zel JM. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int Dent J 2006;56:301-309.
3. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems. Dent Mater 2007;23:952-959.
4. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-991.
5. Attia A, Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:551-556.
6. Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:247-252.
7. Chen HY, Hickel R, Setcos JC, Kunzelmann KH. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:468-475.
8. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995;40:17-21.
9. Sundh A, Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:682-688.
10. Kelly J. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661.
11. Dong X, Darvell B. Stress distribution and failure mode of dental ceramic under Hertizian indentation. Dent Mater 2003;19:542-551.
12. Potiket N, Chiche G, Finger IM. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:491-495.
13. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:602-609.
14. Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gökce B, Cömlekoglu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2007;23:630-636.
15. Fleming GJ, Shaini FJ, Marquis PM. An assessment of the influence of mixing-induced variability on the bi-axial flexure strength of dentine porcelain discs and the implications for laboratory testing of porcelain specimens. Dent Mater 2000;16:114-119.
16. Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ. Mechanical and fracture behavior of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater 2007;23:115-123.