The influence of lens material and lens wear on the removal and viability of Staphylococcus epidermidis

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 126-130

  Santos, Lívia ^a   Rodrigues, Diana ^a   Lira, Madalena ^a   Real Oliveira, M Elisabete C D ^a   Oliveira, Rosário ^a   Vilar, Eva Yebra Pimentel ^b   Azeredo, Joana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bacterial detachment; Cell viability; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

BALAFILCON A; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; ETAFILCON A; GALYFILCON A; LOTRAFILCON A; LOTRAFILCON B; PROPIDIUM IODIDE; SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL VIABILITY; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOASSAY; CELL VIABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; SILICONES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;

EID: 44649098884     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jones L., and Senchyna M. Soft contact lens solution review. Part 1. Components of modern care regimens. Optom Pract 8 (2007) XX
2. Rakow P.L. Current contact lens care systems. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16 (2003) 415-432
3. Baker F., and Breach M. Antiseptics and disinfectants. Methods Enzymol 2 (1987) 61-68
4. Russell A.D. Biocide and antibiotic resistance: the relevance of laboratory findings to clinical and environmental situations. Infect Dis 3 (2003) 794-803
5. Russell A.D. Similarities and differences in the responses of microrganisms to biocides. J Antimicrob Chemother 52 (2003) 750-763
6. Russell A.D. Bacterial adaptation and resistance to antiseptics, disinfectants and preservatives is not a new phenomenon. J Hosp Infect 57 (2004) 97-104
7. Landa A.S., van der Mei H.C., van Rij G., and Busscher H.J. Efficacy of ophthalmic solution to detach adhering Pseudomonas aeruginosa from contact lenses. Cornea 17 (1998) 293-300
8. Gilbert P., and Moore L.E. Cationic antiseptics: diversity under a common epithet. J Appl Microbiol 99 (2005) 703-715
9. Maillard J.-Y. Bacterial target sites for biocide action. J Appl Microbiol Symp Suppl 92 (2002) 16S-27S
10. Borazjani R.N., May L.L., Noble J.A., Avery N.S., and Aheran D.G. Flow cytometry for determination of the efficacy of contact lens disinfection solutions against Acanthamoeba spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 66 (2000) 1057-1061
11. Codling C.E., Hann A.C., Maillard J.Y., and Russell A.D. An investigation into the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of two contact lens biocides using electron microscopy. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 28 (2005) 163-168
12. Dannelly H.K., and Waworuntu R.V. Effectiveness of contact lens disinfectants after lens storage. Eye Contact Lens 30 (2004) 163-165
13. Gavin J., Button N.F., Watson Craik I.A., and Logan N.A. Observation of soft contact lens disinfection with fluorescent metabolic stains. Appl Environ Microbiol 66 (2000) 874-875
14. Hume E.B.H., Zhu H., Cole N., Huynh C., Lam S., and Willcox M.D.P. Efficacy of contact lens multipurpose solutions against Serratia marcescens. Optom Vis Sci 84 (2007) 316-320
15. Lakkis C., and Fleiszig S.M.J. Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to hydrogel contact lens disinfection correlates with cytotoxic activity. J Clin Microbiol 39 (2001) 1477-1486
16. Rosenthal R.A., Henry C.L., and Schlech B.A. Contribution of regimen steps to disinfection of hydrophilic contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 27 (2004) 149-156
17. Santodomingo-Rubido J., Mori O., and Kawaminami S. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multipurpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Ophthal Physiol Opt 26 (2006) 476-482
18. Cerca N., Pier G.B., Vilanova M., Oliveira R., and Azeredo J. Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Res Microbiol 156 (2005) 506-514
19. Tas J., and Westerneng G. Reagent for the fluorescent staining of nucleic acids. J Histochem Cytochem 29 (1981) 929
20. Götz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 43 (2002) 1367-1378
21. Götz F. Staphylococci in colonization and disease: prospective targets for drugs and vaccines. Curr Opin Microbiol 7 (2004) 477-487
22. Gristina A.G., and Naylor P.T. Implant-associated infection. In: Ratner B.D., Hoffman A.S., Schoen F.J., and Lemons J.E. (Eds). Biomaterials Science-An Introduction to Materials in Medicine (1996), Academic Press 205-214
23. Packham D.E. Surface energy, topography and adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes 23 (2003) 437-448
24. Guryča V., Hobzová R., and Pøádny M. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques. Contact Lens Anterior Eye (2007)
25. Tonge S., Tighe B., and Franklin V. Contact lens care. Part 5. The design and wetting of multipurpose solutions. Optician 222 (2001) 22-28
26. López-Alemany A., Compañ V., and Refojo M.F. Porous structure of Purevision™, versus Focus® Night&Day™ and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 63 (2002) 319-325
27. González-Méijome J.M., López-Alemany A., Almeida J.B., Parafita M.A., and Refojo M.F. Microscopic observations of superficial ultrastructure of unworn siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 76B (2007) 419-423
28. Santos L., Rodrigues D., Lira M., Real Oliveira M.E.C.D., Oliveira R., Vilar E.Y.-P., et al. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, proteins adsorption, and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 30 (2007) 183-188
29. Sariri R. Protein interaction with hydrogel contact lenses. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2 (2004) 1-19
30. Williams T.J., Willcox M.D.P., and Schneider R.P. Interactions of bacteria with contact lenses: the effect of soluble protein and carbohydrate on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 75 (1998) 266-271