The application of new technologies to solving maths problems for students with learning disabilities: The 'underwater school';Aplicación de nuevas tecnologías con estudiantes con dificultades de aprendizaje en la solución de problemas matemáticos: La 'escuela submarina'

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 46, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Miranda Casas, Ana ^a   Marco Taverner, R ^a   Soriano Ferrer, M ^a   Melia De Alba A ^a   Simo Casan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computer; Instruction; Learning disabilities; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCHOOL CHILD; TEACHING; TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 44449127530     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.46s01.2007662     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Shiah R, Mastropieri MA, Scruggs TE, Mushinski Fulk BJ. The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality 1995; 5: 131-61.
2. Miranda A, Arlandis P, Soriano M. Instrucción en estrategias y entrenamiento atribucional: efectos sobre la resolución de problemas y el autocontrol de los estudiantes con dificultades de aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje 1997; 80: 37-52.
3. Montague M. Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1997; 30: 164-77.
4. Willis GB, Fuson KC. Teaching children to use schematic drawings to solve addition and subtraction word problems. J Educ Psychol 1998; 80: 192-201.
5. Marshall SP. Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
6. Jitendra AK, Griffin C, Haria P, Leh J, Adams A, Kaduvettoor A. A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade student's mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 2007; 99: 115-27.
7. Maccinini P, Ruhl KL. Effects of graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic substraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children 2000; 23: 465-89.
8. Butler FM, Miller SP, Crehan K, Babbit B, Pierce T. Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: comparing two teaching sequences. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2003; 18: 99-111.
9. Miranda A, Fortes MC. Aplicación de las técnicas cognitivo comportamentales a la resolución de problemas de matemáticas. Revista de Psicología de la Educación 1989; 1: 57-72.
10. Case LP, Harris KR, Graham S. Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: self-regulated strategy development. J Spec Educ 1992; 26: 1-19.
11. Wood DA, Rosenberg MS, Carran DT. The effects of tape-recorded self-instruction cues on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1993; 26: 250-8.
12. Kroesbergen EH, Van Luit JE. Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education 2003; 24: 97-114.
13. Stellingwerf BP, Van Lieshout ECDM. Manipulatives and number sentences in a computer-aided arithmetic problem solving. Instructional Science 1999; 27: 459-76.
14. Woodward J, Cuban L. Technology, curriculum and professional development. Meeting the needs of students with disabilities. Thousan Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2000.
15. Canals R. Pruebas psicopedagógicas de aprendizajes instrumentales. Barcelona: Onda; 1988.
16. Toro J, Cervera M. TALE. Test de análisis de lectoescritura. Madrid: Aprendizaje Visor; 1984.
17. Kintsch W, Greeno AG. Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychol Rev 1985; 95: 163-82.
18. Crandall VC, Katkovsky W, Crandall VJ. Children's belief in their own control of reinforcements in intellectual-academic achievement situations. Child Dev 1965; 36: 91-109.
19. Miranda A, Martorell C, Llacer MD, Peiró R, Silva F. IPE. Inventario de problemas en la escuela. In Silva F, Martorell C, eds. Evaluación de la personalidad infantil y juvenil (EPIJ). Vol. 1. Madrid: MEPSA; 1993.
20. Ahn D. An exploratory study into the development of cognitive and metacognitive processes in mathematics problem solving via computer. Diss Abstr Int Sec A Hum Soc Sci 1999; 59: 12-A, 4356.
21. Woodward J, Baxter J. The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving in students in inclusive settings. Except Child 1997; 63: 373-88.
22. Fuchs LS, Fuchs D, Hamlett CL, Appleton AC. Explicitly teaching for transfer: effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2002; 17: 90-106.
23. Scott T, Cole M, Engel M. Computers and educations: a culture constructivist perspective. Rev Res Educ 1990; 24: 191-251.
24. Elbaum B, Vaughn S. School-based interventions to enhance the self concept of students with learning disabilities: a meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal 2001; 101: 303-29.
25. Desoete A, Roeyers H, Buysse A. Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. J Learn Disabil 2001; 34: 435-49.
26. Owen RL, Fuchs LS. Mathematical problem-solving strategy instruction for third-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education 2002; 23: 268-78.
27. Fuchs LS, Fuchs D, Prentice K, Burch M, Hamlett CL, Owen R, et al. Explicitly teaching for transfer: effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 2003; 95: 293-304.
28. Fuchs LS, Fuchs D, Prentice K, Burch M, Hamlett CL, Owen R, et al. Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. J Educ Psychol 2003; 95: 306-15.