'Robot Kung fu': Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1232-1248

  Tse, Polly ^a   Hyland, Ken ^b  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Book reviews; Disciplinary discourses; Gender; Identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 43849100414     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bakhtin M.M. V. McGee (Trans.). In: Emerson C., and Holquist M. (Eds). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (1986), University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
2. Bazerman C. Foreward. In: Blyler N., and Thralls C. (Eds). Professional communication: The social perspective (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA vii-x
3. Becher T., and Trowler P. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd Ed. (2001), SRHE/OUP, Milton Keynes
4. Bergvall V. Toward a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language in Society 28 (1999) 273-293
5. Bloor T. Three hypothetical strategies in philosophical writing. In: Ventola E., and Mauranen A. (Eds). Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues (1996), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 19-43
6. Cameron D. Not gender differences but the differences gender makes: explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94 (1992) 13-26
7. Cameron D. Rethinking language and gender studies: some issues for the 1990s. In: Mills S. (Ed). Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspective (1995), Longman, London 31-44
8. Coates J. Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In: Coates J., and Carmeron D. (Eds). Women in their Speech Communities (1989), Longman, London 94-121
9. Crammond J. The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication 15 2 (1998) 230-268
10. Crismore A., Markkanen R., and Steffensen M. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing. Written Communication 10 1 (1993) 39-71
11. Ehrlich S. Gender as social practice: implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1997) 421-446
12. Flynn E. Composing as a woman. College Composition and Communication 39 (1988) 423-435
13. Francis B., Robsen J., and Read B. An analysis of undergraduate writing styles in the context of gender and achievement. Studies in Higher Education 26 3 (2001) 313-326
14. Gee J. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 2nd ed. (1996), Taylor & Francis, London
15. Halliday M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1994), Edward Arnold, London
16. Herbert R.K. Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society 19 (1990) 201-224
17. Herring S., Johnson D., and DiBenedetto T. "The discussion is going too far!" Male resistance to female participation on the Internet. In: Bucholtz M., and Hall K. (Eds). Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (1995), Routledge, New York 67-96
18. Holmes J. Paying compliments: a sex-preferred positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12 3 (1988) 445-465
19. Holmes J. Women, Men and Politeness (1995), Longman, London
20. Hyland K. Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998) 437-455
21. Hyland K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2000), Longman, London
22. Hyland K. Bringing in the reader: addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication 18 4 (2001) 549-574
23. Hyland K. Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 133-151
24. Hyland K. Metadiscourse (2005), Continuum, London
25. Hyland K., and Tse P. Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25 2 (2004) 156-177
26. Ivanic R., and Camps D. I am how I sound: voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 1-2 (2001) 3-33
27. Johnson D., and Roen D. Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: gender variation. Language in Society 21 (1992) 27-57
28. Kirsch G. Women Writing in the Academy: Audience, Authority, and Transformation (1993), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville
29. Kubota R. New approaches to gender, class, and race in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 1 (2003) 31-47
30. Lakoff R. Language and Woman's Place (1975), Harper and Row, New York
31. Lindholm-Romantschuk Y. Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities (1998), Greenwood Press, London
32. Luke C., and Gore J. Women in the academy: strategy, struggle, survival. In: Luke C., and Gore (Eds). Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy (1992), Routledge, New York 192-210
33. Lynch C., and Strauss-Noll M. Mauve washers: sex differences in freshman writing. English Journal 76 (1987) 90-94
34. Myers G. Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes 11 1 (1992) 3-17
35. Orteza y Miranda E. On book reviewing. Journal of Educational Thought 30 2 (1996) 191-202
36. Robson J., Francis B., and Read B. Writers of passage: stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays. Journal of Further and Higher Education 26 4 (2002) 351-362
37. Roen D., and Johnson D. Perceiving the effectiveness of written discourse through gender lenses: the contribution of complimenting. Written Communication 9 (1992) 435-464
38. Rubin D., and Greene K. Gender-typical style in written language. Research in the Teaching of English 26 (1992) 7-40
39. Sunderland J. Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching 33 (2000) 203-223
40. Talbot M. Language and gender. In: Brown K. (Ed). Encyclopaedia of Language and Lingusitics. 2nd ed. (2005), Elsevier, Oxford
41. Tannen D. Talking from 9 to 5: How Women's and Men's Conversational Styles Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work (1994), William Morrow, New York
42. Thompson G. Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22 1 (2001) 58-78