Probiotic potential of enterococci isolated from canine feed

Folia Microbiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 84-88

  Laukova A ^a   Marcinakova M ^a   Strompfova V ^a   Ouwehand, A C ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^b Danisco Finland Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; LACTIC ACID; PROBIOTIC AGENT; UREASE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DOG; DRUG EFFECT; ENTEROCOCCUS; HUMAN; INTESTINE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DOGS; ENTEROCOCCUS; HUMANS; INTESTINES; LACTIC ACID; PROBIOTICS; UREASE;

ENTEROCOCCUS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; ENTEROCOCCUS HIRAE;

EID: 43749104206     PISSN: 00155632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12223-008-0012-3     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Audisio M.C., Oliver G., Apella M.C.: Protective effect of Enterococcus faecium J96, a potential probiotic strain, on chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. J.Food Protect. 63, 1333-1337 (2000).
2. Baele M., Baele P., Van Eechoutte M., Storms V., Butay P., De Vriese L., Verschraegen G., Gillis M., Haesebrouck F.: Application of tDNA-PCR for the identification of enterococci. J.Clin.Microbiol. 38, 4201-4207 (2000).
3. Belicová A., Krížkova L., Dobiás J., Krajčovič J., Ebringer L.: Synergic activity of selenium and probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium M74 against selected mutagens in Salmonella assay. Folia Microbiol. 49, 301-306 (2004).
4. Belicová A., Križková L., Krajčovič J., Jurkovič D., Sojka M., Ebringer L., Dušinský R.: Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus species isolated from Slovak Bryndza cheese. Folia Microbiol. 52, 115-119 (2007).
5. Biourge V., Vallet C., Levesque A., Sergheraert R., Chevalier S., Roberton J.L.: The use of probiotics in the diet of dogs. J.Nutr. 128, S2730-S2732 (1998).
6. Bomba A., Kastel R., Gancarciková S., Nemcová R., Herich R., Čižek M.: The effect of lactobacilli inoculation on organic acid levels in the mucosal film and the small intestine contents in gnotobiotic pigs. Berl.Muench.Tierarztl.Wchschr. 109, 428-430 (1996).
7. Cintas L.M., Casaus P., Havarstain L.V., Hernandez P.E., Nes I.F.: Biochemical and genetic characterization of enterocin P, a novel sec-dependent bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium P13 with a broad antimicrobial spectrum. Appl.Environ.Microbiol. 63, 4321-4330 (1997).
8. Cook A.R.: Urease activity in the rumen of sheep and the isolation of ureolytic bacteria. J.Gen.Microbiol. 92, 32-48 (1976).
9. De Vriese L.A., Cruz Colque J.I., De Herdt P., Haesebrouck F.: Identification and composition of the tonsillar and anal enterococcal and streptococcal flora of dogs and cats. J.Appl.Bacteriol. 73, 421-425 (1992).
10. De Vriese L.A., Pot B.: The genera of lactic acid bacteria - the genus Enterococcus, pp. 327-367 in B.J.B. Wood, W.H. Holzapfel (Eds): The Lactic Acid Bacteria, Vol. 2. Blackie Academic, London 1995.
11. De Vuyst L., Callewaert R., Pot B.: Characterization and antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE471 and large scale isolation of its bacteriocin amylovorin L471. Syst.Appl.Microbiol. 19, 269-277 (1996).
12. Ducluzeau R., Gouet P., Williams P.E.V.: Probiotics in ruminants, pp. 343-345 in J.P. Jouany (Ed.): Rumen Microbial Metabolism and Ruminant Digestion. National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Paris 1991.
13. Gilliland S.E., Walker D.K.: Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesteremic effect in humans. J.Diary Sci. 73, 905-911 (1990).
14. - anaerobic dominant components of human fecal microbiota. Folia Microbiol. 51, 141-146 (2006).
15. Herman D.J., Gerding D.N.: Antimicrobial resistance among enterococci. Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. 35, 1-4 (1991).
16. Horosová K., Bujňáková D., Kmeť V.: Effect of lactobacilli on E. coli adhesion to Caco-2 cells in vitro. Folia Microbiol. 51, 281-282 (2006).
17. Jack R. W., Tagg J.R., Ray B.: Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol.Rev. 59, 171-200 (1995).
18. Jurkovič D., Križková L., Dušinský R., Belicová A., Sojka M., Krajčovič J., Ebringer L.: Identification and characterization of enterococci from Bryndza cheese. Lett.Appl.Microbiol. 42, 553-559 (2006).
19. Kirjavainen P.V., Ouwehand A.C., Isolauri E., Salminen S.: The ability of probiotic bacteria to bind to human intestinal mucus. FEMS Microbiol.Lett. 167, 185-189 (1998).
20. Kokešová A., Frolová L., Kverka M., Sokol D., Rossmann P., Bártová J., Tlaskalová-Hogenová H.: Oral administration of probiotic bacteria (E. coli Nissle, E. coli O83, Lactobacillus casei) influences the severity of dextran-sodium-sulfate-induced colitis in BALB/c mice. Folia Microbiol. 51, 478-484 (2006).
21. Lauková A.: Identification of ruminal enterococcal and streptococcal flora of sheep. J.Appl.Anim.Res. 5, 63-71 (1994).
22. Lauková A., Juriš P.: Distribution and characterization of Enterococcus species in municipal sewages. Microbios 89, 73-80 (1997).
23. Lauková A., Koniarová I.: Survey of urease activity in ruminal bacteria isolated from domestic and wild ruminants. Microbios 84, 7-11 (1995).
24. Lauková A., Kuncová M., Kmeť V.: Isolation of several conjugative plasmids of the rumen bacteria Enterococcus faecium. Biológia (Bratislava) 45, 533-538 (1990).
25. Lauková A., Mareková M., Javorský P.: Detection and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231. Lett.Appl.Microbiol. 16, 257-260 (1993).
26. Lauková A., Guba P., Nemcová R., Vasilková Z.: Reduction of Salmonella in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK13 strain of Enterococcus faecium. Vet.Res.Commun. 27, 275-280 (2003).
27. Lauková A., Strompfová V., Ouwehand A.: Adhesion properties of enterococci to intestinal mucus of different hosts. Vet.Res.Commun. 28, 1-9 (2004).
28. Lauková A., Švec P., Strompfová V., Štětina V., Sedláček I.: Properties of the strains Enterococcus haemoperoxidus and E. moraviensis, new species among enterococci. Folia Microbiol. 52, 273-280 (2007).
29. Marciňáková M.: Probiotic microorganisms in feed and in digestive tract of animals and their role in prevention. PhD Thesis. Institute of Animal Physiology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice (Slovakia) 2006.
30. Marciňáková M., Strompfová V., Boldižárová K., Simonová M., Lauková A., Naď P.: Effect of potential probiotic Enterococcus faecium strains on selected microflora in turkeys. Czech J.Anim.Sci. 50, 341-346 (2005).
31. Marciňáková M., Simonová M., Strompfová V., Lauková A.: Oral application of Enterococcus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs. Folia Microbiol. 51, 239-242 (2006).
32. Mareková M.: Genetic manipulation of the ruminal bacteria Streptococcus bovis. PhD Thesis. Institute of Animal Physiology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice (Slovakia) 1992.
33. Mareková M., Laukova A., De Vuyst L., Skaugen M., Nes I.F.: Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strain Enterococcus faecium EK13. J.Appl.Microbiol. 94, 523-530 (2003).
34. Mego M., Májek J., Končeková R., Ebringer L., Čierniková S., Rauko P., Kováč M., Trupl J., Slezák P., Zajac V.: Intramucosal bacteria in colon cancer and their elimination by probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M-74 with organic selenium. Folia Microbiol. 50, 443-447 (2005).
35. Nemcová R.: Criteria for selection of lactobacilli for probiotic use. Vet.Med.Czech 42, 19-27 (1997).
36. Niemi R.M., Niemela S.I., Bamford D.H., Hantula J., Hyvarynen T., Forsten T., Raateland A.: Presumptive fecal streptococci in environmental samples characterized by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 59, 2199-2196 (1993).
37. Ott E. M., Mueller T., Mueller M., Franz C.M.P.A., Ulrich A., Gabel M., Seyfarth W.: Population dynamics and antagonistic potential of enterococci colonizing the phyllosphere of grasses. J.Appl.Microbiol. 91, 54-66 (2001).
38. Ouwehand A.C., Kirjavainen P.V., Gronlund M.M., Isolauri E., Salminen S.: Adhesion of probiotic microorganisms to intestinal mucus. Internat.Dairy J. 9, 623-630 (1999).
39. Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S., Tolkko S., Roberts P., Ovaska J., Salminen E.: Resected human colonic tissue: new model for characterizing adhesion on lactic acid bacteria. Clin.Diagn.Lab.Immunol. 9, 184-186 (2002).
40. Pantev A., Kabadjova P., Dalgalarrondo M., Haertlé T., Ivanova I., Dousset X., Prévost H., Chobert J.-M.: Isolation and partial characterization of an antibacterial substance produced by Enterococcus faecium. Folia Microbiol. 47, 391-400 (2002).
41. Pryce J.D.: A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst 94, 1151-1152 (1969).
42. Rinkinen M., Matto J., Salminen S., Westermarck E., Ouwehand A.C.: In vitro adhesion of lactic acid bacteria to canine small intestinal mucus. J.Anim.Physiol.Anim.Nutr. 84, 43-47 (2000).
43. Rinkinen M., Westermarck E., Salminen S., Ouwehand A.C.: Absence of host specificity for in vitro adhesion of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to intestinal mucus. Vet.Microbiol. 97, 55-61 (2003).
44. Salminen S., Laine M., XXXvon Wright B., Vuopio-Varkila J., Korhonen T., Mattila-Sandholm T.: Development of selection criteria for probiotic strains to assess their potential in functional foods: a Nordic and European approach. Biosci.Microflora 15, 61-67 (1996).
45. Salminen S., Ouwehand A., Benno Y., Lee Y.K.: Probiotics: how should they be defined? Trends Food Sci.Technol. 10, 107-110 (1999).
46. Saxelin M., Grenov B.M., Svensson U., Fondén R., Reniero R., Mattila-Sandholm T.: The technology of probiotics. Trends Food Sci.Technol. 10, 387-392 (1999).
47. Simon O., Jadamus A., Vahjen W.: Probiotic feed additives-effectiveness and expected modes of action. J.Anim.Feed Sci. 10, 51-67 (2001).
48. Simonová M., Lauková A., Štyriak I.: Enterococci from rabbits - potential feed additive. Czech J.Anim.Sci. 50, 416-421 (2005).
49. Štětina V., Lauková A., Strompfová V., Švec P., Sedláček I.: Identification of Staphyloccoccus piscifermentas from dog feces. Folia Microbiol. 50, 524-528 (2005).
50. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C.: Lactobacilli and enterococci - potential probiotics for dogs. Folia Microbiol. 49, 203-207 (2004a).
51. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C.: Selection of enterococci for potential canine probiotic additives. Vet.Microbiol. 100, 107-114 (2004b).
52. Strompfová V., Marciňáková M., Simonová, M., Bogovič-Matijašič B., Lauková A.: Application of potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain to healthy dogs. Anaerobe 12, 75-79 (2006).
53. Švec P., Devriese L.A., Sedláček I., Baele M., Vancanneyt M., Haesebrouck F., Swings J.D., Doškař J.: Enterococcus haemoperoxidus sp.nov. and Ent. moraviensis sp.nov., isolated from water. Internat.J.Syst.Evol.Microbiol. 51, 1567-1574 (2001).
54. Trebichavský I., Šplíchal I.: Probiotics manipulate host cytokine response and induce antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol. 51, 507-510 (2006).
55. Vahjen W., Männer K.: The effect of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium product in diets of healthy dogs on bacteriological counts of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. and Clostridium spp. in feces. Arch.Anim.Nutr. 57, 229-233 (2003.
56. Welsh J., McClelland M.: Genomic fingerprints produced by PCR with consensus tRNA gene primers. Nucl.Acids Res. 19, 861-866 (1991).
57. Woodford N., Egelton C.M., Morrison D.: Comparison of PCR with phenotypic methods for the speciation of enterococci, pp. 405-407 in T. Horaud, A. Bouvet, R. Leclercq, H. de Montclos, M. Sicard (Eds): Streptococci and the Host. Plenum Press, New York 1997.