Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning beyond the lab

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 368-378

  Eilam, Billie ^a   Poyas, Yael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Homework; Learning; Multimedia; Representational mode

Indexed keywords

EID: 43649100050     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ainsworth S.E. The functions of multiple representations. Computer and Education 33 2/3 (1999) 131-152
2. Ainsworth S.E., Bibby P.A., and Wood D.J. Information technology and multiple representations: new opportunities, new problems. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 6 1 (1997) 93-109
3. Barab S., and Squire K. Designed-based research: putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 1 (2004) 1-14
4. Chandler P., and Sweller J. The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (1992) 233-246
5. Clark J.M., and Paivio A. Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review 3 (1991) 149-210
6. Fishman B., Marx R., Blumenfeld P., Krajcik J., and Soloway E. Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 1 (2004) 43-76
7. Goldman S.R. Commentary. Learning in complex domains: when and why do multiple representations help?. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 239-244
8. Kali Y., Orion N., and Eylon B. Effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 6 (2003) 545-565
9. Larkin J.H., and Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 65-99
10. Levin J.R., Anglin G.J., and Carney R.N. On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In: Willows D.M., and Houghton H.A. (Eds). The psychology of illustration Vol. 1 (1987), Springer, New York 51-86
11. Mayer R.E. Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (1989) 240-246
12. Mayer R.E. Commentary. Comprehension of graphics and texts: an overview. Learning and Instruction 3 (1993) 239-245
13. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist 32 (1997) 1-19
14. Mayer R.E. Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (1999) 611-624
15. Mayer R.E. The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 125-139
16. Mayer R.E., and Gallini J.K. When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1990) 715-726
17. Mayer R.E., Heiser J., and Lonn S. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 1 (2001) 187-198
18. Mayer R.E., and Moreno R. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 2 (1998) 312-320
19. Mayer R.E., and Moreno R. A coherent effect in multimedia learning: the case of minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (2000) 117-125
20. Miller H.J. Illustration. (Part 2, pp. 61-75) (1992), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Molitor S., Ballstaedt S.P., and Mandl H. Problems in knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. In: Mandl H., and Levin J.R. (Eds). Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (1989), North-Holland, Amsterdam 3-35
22. Moreno R., and Mayer R.E. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (1999) 358-368
23. Paivio A. Mental representation: A dual coding approach (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
24. Peeck J. Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction 3 (1993) 227-238
25. Roth W.M., and McGinn M.K. Inscriptions: toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research 68 1 (1998) 35-59
26. Schnotz W. Commentary. Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review 14 1 (2002) 101-120
27. Schnotz W., and Bannert M. Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 141-156
28. In: Schnotz W., and Kulhavy R.W. (Eds). Comprehension of graphics (1994), North-Holland, Amsterdam
29. Seufert T. Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 227-237
30. Small M.Y., Lovett S.B., and Scher M.S. Pictures facilitate children's recall of unillustrated expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 85 3 (1993) 520-528
31. Stern E., Aprea C., and Ebner H.G. Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 191-203
32. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12 (1988) 257-285
33. Tabachneck H.J.M., Leonardo A.M., and Simon H.A. How does an expert use a graph? A model of visual and verbal inferencing in economics. In: Ram A., and Eiselt K. (Eds). Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 842-847
34. Tiene D. Sensory mode and "informational load:" examining the effect of timing on multi-sensory processing. International Journal of Instructional Media 27 2 (2000) 183-198
35. Tsui C.Y., and Treagust D.F. Genetics reasoning with multiple external representations. Research in Science Education 33 1 (2003) 111-135
36. Van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2004, April). Learning with multiple representations. Paper presented at the AERA symposium. San Diego, USA.
37. Winn W.D. Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In: Schnotz W., and Kulhavy R. (Eds). Comprehension of text and graphics (1994), Elsevier, Amsterdam 3-27
38. Yerushalmy M. Students' perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7 (1991) 42-57