Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 875-887

  Bammer, Gabriele ^a,b  

^a The Australian National University   (Australia)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorization; Boundary; Collaboration; Evaluation; Integration

Indexed keywords

GENES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COLLABORATION; LEGITIMATE AUTHORIZATION;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 43449132654     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams J.D., Black G.C., Clemmonsc J.R., and Stephan P.E. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy 34 (2005) 259-285
2. Anderson C., and Aldous P. Still room for HUGO?. Nature 355 (1992) 4-5
3. Bammer, G., 2005. Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecology and Society 10(2), 6 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/.
4. Bammer, G., 2006a. A systematic approach to integration in research. Integration Insights #1, September. Available at www.anu.edu.au/iisn.
5. Bammer G. Scoping public health problems. In: Pencheon D., Guest C., Melzer D., and Gray J.A.M. (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice. second edition (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford 4-11
6. Bammer, G., LWA Integration Symposium Participants, 2005. Guiding principles for integration in natural resource management (NRM) as a contribution to sustainability. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 12 Supplement, 5-7.
7. Belbin M. Team Roles at Work (1993), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
8. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 (2004) 599-616
9. Chompalov I., Genuth J., and Shrum W. The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy 31 (2002) 749-767
10. Clinton B. My Life (2004), Alfred A. Knopf, New York
11. Collins F.S., Morgan M., and Patrinos A. The Human Genome Project: lessons from large-scale biology. Science 300 (2003) 286-290
12. Compton A.H. Atomic Quest. A Personal Narrative (1956), Oxford University Press, London
13. Corley E.A., Boardman P.C., and Bozeman B. Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy 35 (2006) 975-993
14. Cummings L.L., and Bromiley P. The organizational trust inventory. In: Kramer R.M., and Tyler T.R. (Eds). Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 302-330
15. Daiger S.P. Was the Human Genome Project worth the effort?. Science 308 (2005) 362-364
16. De Bono E. Six Thinking Hats (1999), Back Bay Books, Little, Brown and Company, New York
17. Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality, 1981. Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Scoping. April 30, 1981. http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/scope/scoping.htm.
18. Fisher R., Ury W., and Patton B. Getting to Yes. Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In (1991), Random House Business Books, London
19. Giles J. Tide of censure for African dams. Nature 440 (2006) 393-394
20. Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence (1995), Bantam, New York
21. Gray B. Collaboration: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems (1989), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
22. Groueff S. Manhattan Project. The Untold Story of the Making of the Atomic Bomb (1967), Little, Brown and Company, Boston
23. Hackett E.J., Conz D., Parker J., Bashford J., and DeLay S. Tokamaks and turbulence: research ensembles, policy and technoscientific work. Research Policy 33 (2004) 747-767
24. Hackman J.R. Groups that Work (and Those that Don't). Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (1990), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
25. IUCN-World Conservation Union, the World Bank Group, 1997. Large Dams: Learning from the Past, Looking at the Future. Workshop Proceedings. IUCN-World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and World Bank Group, Washington, DC. http://www.dams.org/docs/largedams.pdf.
26. Katz J.S., and Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 (1997) 1-18
27. Khagram S. Dams and Development. Transnational Struggles for Water and Power (2004), Cornell University Press, Ithaca
28. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice (1990), Wayne State University Press, Detroit
29. Lambright, W.H., 2002. Managing "big science": a case study of the Human Genome Project. New Ways to Manage Series. The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/LambrightReport2.pdf.
30. Landry R., and Amara N. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy 27 (1998) 901-913
31. Lee Y.S. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25 (1996) 843-863
32. In: Mandell M.P. (Ed). Getting Results through Collaboration. Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management (2001), Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut
33. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization. Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 (2000) 31-40
34. Midgley G. Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice (2000), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
35. Myers I.B., and Myers P.B. Gifts Differing. Understanding Personality Type (1993), CPP Books, Palo Alto, CA
36. OECD. The Global Human Genome Project. Megascience: The OECD Forum (1995), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
37. Porac J.F., Wade J.B., Fischer H.M., Brown J., Kanfer A., and Bowker G. Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy 33 (2004) 661-678
38. Rhodes R. The Making of the Atomic Bomb (1986), Simon and Schuster, London
39. Rigby J., and Edler J. Peering inside research networks: some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy 34 (2005) 784-794
40. Rossini F.A., and Porter A.L. Frameworks for integrating interdisciplinary research. Research Policy 8 (1979) 70-79
41. Scudder T. The World Commission on Dams and the need for a new development paradigm. Water Resources Development 17 (2001) 329-341
42. Senge P.M. The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation (1990), Century Business, Imprint of Random House UK, London
43. Sulston J., and Ferry G. The Common Thread. A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome (2002), Bantam Press, London
44. Ulrich, W., 2005. A brief introduction to Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH). Available at http://www.geocities.com/csh_home/downloads/ulrich_2005f.pdf.
45. Ury W. Getting Past No. Negotiating your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation (1993), Bantam Books, New York
46. Wagner C.S., and Leydesdorff L. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy 34 (2005) 1608-1618
47. Walker, R., Smith, P., 2001. Evaluating trust in collaborative relationships. Paper presented at Health Services and Policy Research Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, December.
48. Winer M., and Ray K. Collaboration Handbook. Creating, Sustaining and Enjoying the Journey (1994), Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, Saint Paul, MN
49. World Commission on Dams, 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. Earthscan, London. http://www.dams.org//docs/report/wcdreport.pdf.
50. World Commission on Dams, 2001. Final WCD Forum. Report, Responses, Discussions and Outcome. World Commission on Dams, Cape Town. http://www.dams.org/commission/forum/forum_3.htm.