Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 186-190

  Rushton, Simon K ^a   Wann, John P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE HAND COORDINATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOTOR COORDINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0033360185     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/5750     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sun, H. & Frost, B. J. Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 296-303 (1998).
2. Regan, D. & Beverley, K. I. Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion in depth stage. Vision Res. 19, 1331-1342 (1979).
3. Lee, D. N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5, 437-459 (1976).
4. Regan, D. & Hamstra, S. J. Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Res. 33, 447-462 (1993).
5. Heuer, H. Estimates of time to contact based on changing size and changing target vergence. Perception 22, 549-563 (1993).
6. Gray, R. & Regan, D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Res. 38, 499-512 (1997).
7. Wann, J. P. Anticipating arrival: is the tau-margin a specious theory? J. Exp Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 1031-1048 (1996).
8. Tresilian, J. R. Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing Hum. Mov. Sci. 13, 335-373 (1994).
9. Laurent, M., Montagne, G. & Durey, A. Binocular invariants in interception tasks: a directed perception approach. Perception 25, 1437-1450 (1996).
10. Regan, D., Erkelens C. J. & Collewijn, H. Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vision Sci. 27, 584-597 (1986).
11. Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. The Visual Brain in Action (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1996).
12. Alderson, G. J. K., Sully, D. I. & Sully, H. G. An operational analysis of a one-handed catching task using high-speed photography. J. Motor Behav. 6, 217-226 (1974).
13. Tresilian, J. R. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 57, 231-245 (1995).
14. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. J. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Res. 35, 389-412 (1995).
15. Dobbins, A.C., Jeo, R. M., Fiser, I. & Allman, J. M. Distance modulation of neural activity in visual cortex. Science 281, 552-555 (1998).
16. Julesz, B. Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature 290, 91-97 (1981).
17. Regan, D. Visual judgements and misjudgements in cricket, and the art of flight. Perception 21, 91-115 (1992).
18. Peper, C. L., Bootsma, R. J., Mestre, D. R. & Bakker, F. C. Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. J. Exp Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 591-612 (1994).