Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 552-567

  DeLucia, Patricia R ^b   Tresilian, James R ^a   Meyer, Les E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034168902     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.552     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Benussi, V. (1904). Zur Psychologie des Gestalterfassens (die Müller-Lyersche Figur). In A. Meinong (Ed.), Untersuchurgen zur Gegenstands Theorie und Psychologie (pp. 303-448). Leipzig, Germany: Johann Ambrosius Burth.
3. Bootsma, R. J., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (1993). Visual information about time to collision between two objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1041-1052.
4. Bootsma, R. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 21-29.
5. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
6. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
7. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
8. Christie, P. S. (1975). Asymmetry in the Muller-Lyer illusion: Artifact or genuine effect? Perception, 4, 453-457.
9. Cooper, M. R., Runyon, R. P., Tatz, S. J., & Heimer, W. I. (1972). The Sander illusion as a function of relative space and component lines. Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 102-104.
10. Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
12. DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738-748.
13. DeLucia, P. R. (1995). Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgments about potential collision in perspective displays. Human Factors, 37, 528-538.
14. DeLucia, P. R., & Hochberg, J. (1991). Geometrical illusions in solid objects under ordinary viewing conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 547-554.
15. DeLucia, P. R., & Liddell, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction-motion tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 901-914.
16. DeLucia, P. R., & Meyer, L. E. (1999). Judgments about the time-to-contact between two objects during simulated self motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1813-1833.
17. DeLucia, P. R., & Novak, J. B. (1997). Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 913-928.
18. DeLucia, P. R., & Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783-798.
19. Elliott, D., & Lee, T. D. (1995). The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychological Research, 58, 2-9.
20. Falmagne, J. C. (1986). Psychophysical measurement and theory. In K. R. Boff, J. P. Thomas, & L. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-1 to 1-66). New York: Wiley.
21. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M. C., & Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
22. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Keillor, J. M. (1994). Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1159-1178.
23. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
24. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991, January 10). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
25. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986, April 24). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
26. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
27. Jagacinski, R. J., Johnson, W. W., & Miller, R. A. (1983). Quantifying the cognitive trajectories of extrapolated movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 43-57.
28. Kaiser, M. K., & Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028-1040.
29. Lee, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In R. M. MacLeod & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson (pp. 250-267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Lee, D. N., & Young, D. S. (1985). Visual timing of interceptive action. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. N. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
31. Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S., & Clayton, T. M. H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 333-346.
32. Liddell, G. W. (1998). Interfering and updating cognitive representations used in judgments of absolute time-to-contact in a prediction-motion task. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10), 5678B. (Microfilm No. AAT 9812032)
33. Lyon, D. R., & Waag, W. L. (1995). Time course of visual extrapolation accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 89, 239-260.
34. McLeod, P., McLaughlin, C., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1985). Information encapsulation and automaticity: Evidence from the visual control of finely timed actions. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 391-406). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Meyer, J., Shinar, D., Bitan, Y., & Leiser, D. (1996). Duration estimates and users' preferences in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 39, 46-60.
36. Novak, J. B. (1998). Judgments of absolute time-to-contact in multiple object displays: Evaluating the role of cognitive processes in arrival-time judgments. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10), 5679B. (Microfilm No. AAT 9812047)
37. Regan, D., & Hamstra, S. J. (1993). Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research, 33, 447-462.
38. Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Whiting, H. T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 315-322.
39. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658.
40. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
41. Schiff, W., Oldak, R., & Shah, V. (1992). Aging persons' estimates of vehicular motion. Psychology and Aging, 7, 518-525.
42. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 19-31.
43. Smeets, J. B. J., Brenner, E., Trebuchet, S., & Mestre, D. R. (1996). Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'? Perception, 25, 583-590.
44. Subbiah, I., Loomis, J. M., & Philbeck, J. W. (1996, November). Grasping the vertical-horizontal illusion: Control by endpoints or by extent? Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 37th Annual Meeting, 43.
45. Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795-810.
46. Tresilian, J. R. (1990). Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception, 19, 223-239.
47. Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865-876.
48. Tresilian, J. R. (1993). Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing. Perception, 22, 653-680.
49. Tresilian, J. R. (1994). Approximate information sources and perceptual variables in interceptive timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1-20.
50. Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgement tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.
51. Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 515-528.
52. Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 299-337.
53. Vishton, P. M., & Cutting, J. E. (1995). Veridical size perception for action: Reaching vs estimating. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, S358.
54. Vishton, P. M., Cutting, J. E., & Rea, J. G. (1997). Titchener circles & horizontal-vertical illusions do not affect manual prehension or judgements of absolute size. Mueller-Lyer illusion affects both. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, S643.
55. Welch, R. B., Post, B. R., Lum, W., & Cohen, M. M. (1996, November). Are vision and action dissociated with respect to pictorial illusions? Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 37th Annual Meeting, 56.