Robust linear anti-windup synthesis for recovery of unconstrained performance

International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

Volumn 14, Issue 13-14, 2004, Pages 1133-1168

  Grimm, Gene ^a,d   Teel, Andrew R ^b   Zaccarian, Luca ^c  

^a RAYTHEON COMPANY   (United States)

^b University of California at Santa Barbara   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti windup synthesis: input saturation; Linear matrix inequalities

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEM STABILITY;

ANTI-WINDUP SYNTHESIS; INPUT SATURATION; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES (LMI);

LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 4344713236     PISSN: 10498923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.937     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lozier JC. A steady-state approach to the theory of saturable servo systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control 1956; 1:19-39.
2. Kramer LC, Jenkins KW. A new technique for preventing direct digital control windup. In Joint Automatic Control Conference, St. Louis, MO, August 1971; 571-577.
3. Hanus R. Antiwindup and bumpless transfer: a survey. In Proceedings of the 12th IMACS World Congress, vol. 2, Paris, France, July 1988; 59-65.
4. Åström KJ, Rundqwist L. Integrator windup and how to avoid it. In ACC, vol. 2, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1989; 1693-1698.
5. Kothare MV, Campo PJ, Morari M, Nett N. A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs. Automatica 1994; 30(12):1869-1883.
6. Doyle JC, Smith RS, Enns DF. Control of plants with input saturation nonlinearities. In ACC, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., June 1987; 1034-1039.
7. Gilbert EG, Kolmanovsky I, Tan KT. Discrete-time reference governors and the nonlinear control of systems with state and control constraints. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 1995; 5(5):487-504.
8. Zheng A, Kothare MV, Morari M. Anti-windup design for internal model control. International Journal of Control 1994;60(5):1015-1024.
9. Miyamoto A, Vinnicombe G. Robust control of plants with saturation nonlinearity based on coprime factor representation. In 36th CDC, Kobe, Japan, December 1996; 2838-2840.
10. Edwards C, Postlethwaite I. An anti-windup scheme with closed-loop stability considerations. Automatica 1999; 35(4):761-765.
11. Mulder EF, Kothare MV, Morari M. Multivariable anti-windup controller synthesis using linear matrix inequalities. Automatica September 2001; 37(9): 1407-1416.
12. Shamma JS. Anti-windup via constrained regulation with observers. Systems and Control Letters 2000; 40: 1869-1883.
13. Grimm G, Hatfield J, Postlethwaite I, Teel AR, Turner MC, Zaccarian L. Anti-windup for stable linear systems with input saturation: an LMI-based synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2003; 48(9): 1509-1525.
14. Saeki M, Wada N. Synthesis of a static anti-windup compensator via linear matrix inequalities. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 2002; 12:927-953.
15. Cao Y-Y, Lin Z, Ward DG. An anti-windup approach to enlarging the domain of attraction for linear systems subject to actuator saturation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2002; 47(1): 140-145.
16. Gomes da Silva Jr JM, Tarbouriech S, Reginatto R. Analysis of regions of stability for linear systems with saturating inputs through an anti-windup scheme. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Glasgow, Scotland, September 2002; 1106-1111.
17. 2 anti-windup problem: its definition and solution. In Proceedings of the 4th ECC, Brussels, Belgium, July 1997.
18. ∞-optimal control. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Wurzburg, Germany, 1990.
19. Kulkarni VV, Safonov MG. Incremental positivity non-preservation by stability multipliers. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, U.S.A., December 2001; 33-38.
20. Chen X, Wen JT. Robustness analysis of LTI systems with structured incrementally sector bounded nonlinearities. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, U.S.A., June 1995; 3883-3887.
21. Khalil HK. Nonlinear Systems (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, U.S.A., 1996.
22. Kapoor N, Teel AR, Daoutidis P. An anti-windup design for linear systems with input saturation. Automatica 1998; 34(5):559-574.
23. Teel AR. Anti-windup for exponentially unstable linear systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 1999; 9:701-716.
24. Zaccarian L, Teel AR. A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs. Automatica 2002; 38(10):1735-1744.
25. 2 performance. In Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, December 2000; 1063-1068.
26. Morari M, Zafiriou E. Robust Process Control. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
27. Clarke FH. Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, 1990.
28. Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, 1994.
29. ∞ control. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 1994; 4:421-448.
30. ∞ control problem: LMI existence conditions and state space formulas. Automatica 1994; 30(8):1307-1317.
31. Packard A. Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations. Systems and Control Letters 1994; 22(2):79-92.
32. Strang G. Linear Algebra and its Applications. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: New York, 1998.
33. Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K. Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.