On the Status of Representations and Derivations

Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 19-41

  Brody, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Derivational constraints; Derivational theories; Derivations; Redundancy; Representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948738473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Abels, Klaus. 2000. "Move?" MS, University of Connecticut.
2. Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Brody, Michael. 1997a. "Perfect chains." In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 139-67.
4. Brody, Michael. 1997b. "Mirror theory." MS, University College London. (Still earlier short version in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, University College London.)
5. Brody, Michael. 1998a. "Projection and phrase structure." Linguistic Inquiry 29, 367-98.
6. Brody, Michael. 1998b. "The minimalist program and a perfect syntax." Mind and Language 13, 205-14.
7. Brody, Michael. 1999a. "Chains in perfect syntax." Paper presented at the GLOW workshop on "Technical aspects of movement", Potsdam, April 1999.
8. Brody, Michael. 1999b. "Word order, restructuring and mirror theory." In Peter Svenonious (ed.) Proceedings of the Tromso VO-OV Workshop. 27-43. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
9. Brody, Michael 2000a. "Mirror theory: syntactic representation in perfect syntax." Linguistic Inquiry 31.1.
10. Brody, Michael. 2000b. "Relating syntactic elements." Syntax 2, 210-26.
11. Brody, Michael. 2000c. "One more time." To appear in Syntax 4, 126-38.
12. Brody, Michael and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. "Overt scope: a case study in Hungarian." MS, New York University and University College London.
13. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, Noam. 1999. "Derivation by phase." MS, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. "Minimalist inquiries: The framework." In Roger Martin et al., eds., Step-by-step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Epstein, Samuel. 1995. "Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations." MS, Harvard University. Published version in Working Minimalism. 1999. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Epstein, Samuel, et al. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: OUP.
18. Fiengo, Robert and Robert May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Fox, Daniel. 1999. "Reconstruction, binding theory and the interpretation of chains." Linguistic Inquiry 30, 157-96.
20. Freidin, Robert. 1978. "Cyclicity and the theory of grammar." Linguistic Inquiry 9, 519-49.
21. Groat, Eric. 1995. GLOW abstract.
22. Heycock, Caroline. 1995. "Asymmetries in reconstruction." Linguistic Inquiry 26, 547-70.
23. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. "Movement and chains." Syntax 1, 99-127.
24. Hornstein, Norbert. 2000. "On A-chains: A reply to Brody." Syntax 3, 129-43.
25. Kayne, Richard. 1994. Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Kayne, Richard. 2000. "Recent thoughts on antisymmetry." Paper presented at the Cortona Workshop on Antisymmetry, May 2000.
27. Kuno, Susumo. 1998. "Binding theory in the minimalist program." MS, Harvard University.
28. Lechner, Winfried. 2000. Class handouts, Blago Summer School, July-August 2000.
29. Nunes, Jairo. 2000. "Sideward movement." MS, University of Maryland.
30. Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2000. "T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences." In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
31. Reuland, Eric. 1997. "Primitives of binding." Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, working paper.
32. Richards, Norwin. 1997. "What moves where in which language." Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge MA: MIT.
33. Safir, Ken. 1998. "Vehicle change and reconstruction in A′-chains." MS, Rutgers University, NJ.
34. Starke, Michal. 2000. GLOW abstract.