The object agreement constraint

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 315-347

  Ormazabal, Javier ^a   Romero, Juan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agreement; Animacy; Applicative object; Clitic clusters; Constructions; Ditrinsitive; Object Agreement Constraint (OAC); Person case constraint (PCC)

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249023352     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adger, D., & Harbour, D. (2004). "Die syntax and syncretisms of the person case constraint to appear in MITWPL.
2. Albizu, P. (1997a). Generalized person-case constraint: A case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. In A. Mendikoetxea, & M. Uribe-Etxebarria (Eds.), Theoretical issues on the morphology-syntax interface. Supplements of the Anuario del Seminario Julio de Urquijo # 40 (pp. 1-34). San Sebastian, Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.
3. Albizu, P. (1997b). The syntax of person agreement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
4. Albizu, P. (2002). Datibo sintagmen izaera sintaktikoaren inguruan: Eztabaidarako oinarrizko zenbait datu. In B. Fernández, & P. Albizu (Eds.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean/On Case and Agreement (pp. 9-70). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Publications.
5. Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999). Dative argument and clitic doubling, ms., MIT.
6. Anagnostopoulou, E. (2002). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Arregi, E. (2003a). Dative alternations in basque, ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU).
8. Arregi, E. (2003b). Possessor dative constructions in Basque must be derived, ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU).
9. Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
10. Baker, M. (1996). The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Barss, A., & Lasnik, H. (1986). A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 347-353.
12. Bejar, S., & Rezac, M. (2006). Cyclic agree and the derivation of PCC effects, (to appear) In A. T. Pérez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Selected papers from LSRL XXXII. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Blake, B. (1987). Australian aboriginal grammar. Camberra: Croom Helm.
14. Bleam, T. M. (2000). Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.
15. Boeckx, C. (2000). Quirky agreement. Studio Linguistica, 54, 354-380.
16. Boeckx, C. (2004). Long distance agreement in Hindi: Theoretical implications. Studia Linguistica, 58, 23-43.
17. Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
18. Borer, H., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1.986). Syntactic cliticization and lexical cliticization: The case of Hebrew dative clitics. In H. Borer (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, (Vol. 19, pp. 175-215). New York, Academic Press.
19. Bresnan, J., & Moshi, L. (1990). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 147-185.
20. Brugè, L., & Brugger, G. (1996). On the accusative a in Spanish. Probus, 8, 1-51.
21. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin et al. (Eds.), Step by step: Papers in honour of Howard Lasnik (pp. 289-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic Proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-617.
25. Dryer, M. S. (1986). Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language, 62, 808-845.
26. Evans, N. (1997). Role or Cast? Noun incorporation and complex Predicates in Mayali. In A. Alsina et al. (Eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 397-430). Stanford: CSU.
27. Fernández-Ordóñez, I. (1999). Leísmo, laímo y loíemo. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua espanola (pp. 1317-1397). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
28. Fernández Soriano, O. (1989). Rección y ligamiento en español: aspectos del parámetro del sujeto nulo. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
29. Franco, J. (1993). On object agreement in Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
30. Hale, K. (1973). Person marking in Walbiri. In S. Anderson, & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 308-344). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
31. Hanson, R. (2000). Pronoun acquisition and the morphological feature geometry. In S. Atkey, J. Carson, & M. Dobrovolsky. (Eds.), Calgary working papers in linguistics (Vol. 22, pp. 1-4). Calgary.
32. Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry. In H. Simon, & H. Weise (Eds.), Pronouns: Features and representation (pp. 23-39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Harris, A. C. (1981). Georgian Syntax: A study in relational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Haspelmath, M. (2001). Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: A usage-based approach. ms., Max-Planck-Institut für evolutionäre Anthropologie.
35. Hualde, J.I. (1989). Double object constructions in KiRimi. In P. Newman, & R. Botne (Eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics (Vol. 5). Dordrecht: Foris.
36. Huang, J. (1.984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-574.
37. de Jong, J. J. (1996). The case of bound pronouns in peripherial Romance. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics, Groningen.
38. Koizumi, M. (1.995). Phrase structure in Minimalist syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
39. 0-syntax. In J. I. Hualde, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics (pp. 21-70). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
40. Landa, A. (1995). Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and their relation to Lefemo and clitic doubling. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
41. Larson, M. (2002). The semantics of object drop in Baule. In M. Nissim (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th ESSLLI Student Session (pp. 1-10).
42. Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75-114.
43. Masullo, P. (1992). Incorporation and Case theory in Spanish: A crosslinguistic perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
44. Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60, 847-94.
45. Ormazabal, I (2000). A conspiracy theory of case and agreement. In R. Martin et al. (Eds.), Step by step; Papers in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 235-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (1998a). Attract-F: A case against case. Paper presented at the 21st GLOW Conference, Tilburg.
47. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (1998b). On the syntactic nature of the me-lui and the Person-Case Constraint. Anuario del Seminario Julio de Urquijo, 32, 415-434.
48. Ormazabal, .1. & Romero, J. (2002). Agreement restrictions, ms., University of the Basque Country (EHU)/Basque Center for Language Research (LEHIA) and University of Alcalá/U. Autónoma de Madrid.
49. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2003). Komunztadura, hiru ikuspegi (II): Absolutibo komuntadurarik eza. In J. Gorrotxategi (Ed.), Basque and (Paleo) Hispanic studies. In the wake of Michelena 's work (pp. 315-332). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Publications.
50. Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2004). Clitics and agreement. In O. Crouzet (Ed.), Proceedings of the. III Journées d'Études Linguistiques de Nantes (JEL'2004). University of Nantes.
51. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2006). Object clitics, determiners, and agreement, ms., University of the Basque Country/Hitt, University of Extremadura.
52. Pensado, C. (1.995). El complemento directo preposicional. Visor: Madrid.
53. Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface, structure constraints in syntax. New York: Rinehart & Winston Inc.
54. Reinhart, T, & Reuland, E. (1993). Reftexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657-720.
55. Rezac, M. (2003). The fine structure of cyclic agree. Syntax, 6, 156-182.
56. Rezac, M. (2004). Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and merge. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto. Rivero, M. L., & Sheppard, M. M. (2003). Indefinite reflexive Clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language, and Linguistic Theory, 21, 89-155.
57. Roca, F. (1992). On the licensing of pronominal clitics: The properties of object clitics in Spanish and Catalan. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
58. Roca, F. (1996). Morfemas objetivos y determinantes: los clíticos del español. Verba, 23, 83-119.
59. Romero, J. (1997). Construcciones de doble objeto y gramática universal. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
60. Romero, I (1999). The case of agreement. In K. Arregui, B. Bruening, & V. Lin (Eds.), Papers on syntax and morphology (MITWPL33) (pp. 343-368). Cambridge, MA.
61. Romero, J. (2001a). A note on Case (mis)-match in Spanish. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I. U. Ortega y Gasset, 8, 97-104.
62. Romero, J. (2001b). On the representational nature of case, ms., U. Autónoma de Madrid/U. de Alcalá de Henares.
63. Rude, N. (1986). Topicality, transitivity and the direct object in Nez Perce. International Journal of American Linguistics, 52, 124-153.
64. Saah, K. K. (1992). Null object construction in akan. In C. Collins, & V. Manfredi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop, MITWPL (Vol. 17, pp. 219-244).
65. Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112-171). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
66. [Reprinted in P. Muysken, & H. van Riemsdijk. (1986). Features and projections, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 163-232.]
67. Suñer, M. (1988). The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 391-434.
68. Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Uriagereka, J. (1988). On Government. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
70. Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79-124.
71. Uriagereka, J. (1996). Warps: some thoughts on categorization. Cuadernos de Lingüística de IU. Ortega y Gasset, 4, 1-38.
72. Woolford, E. (2000). Agreement in disguise. In V. Carstens, & E Parkinson (Eds.), Advances in African linguistics (pp. 103-117). Trenton: Africa World Press.
73. Wurm, S. A. (1976). Accusative marking in Duudidjawu (Waga-waga). In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 106-111). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Languages.