Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 185-230

  Embick, David ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Category; Distributed Morphology; Features; Passive voice; Syntax morphology interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038885040     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438900554343     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Allen, Joseph H. 1931. Allen and Greenough's new Latin grammar for schools and colleges. New York: Ginn.
2. Anderson, Stephen. 1982. Where's morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13:571-612.
3. Anderson, Stephen. 1986. Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4:1-32.
4. Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Arregi, Karlos. 1999. Tense in Basque. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
7. Baldi, Phillip. 1976. Remarks on the Latin r-form verbs. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 90: 222-257.
8. Beard, Robert. 1966. The affixation of adjectives in contemporary literary Serbo-Croatian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
9. Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme based morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
10. Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:291-352.
11. Benveniste, Émile. 1948. Noms d'agent et noms d'action en Indo-Européen. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
12. Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1994. What does adjacency do? In MIT working papers in linguistics 21: The morphology-syntax connection, 1-32. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
14. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. Morphosyntax: On the syntax of verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
15. Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent, and Carol Chapman. 1996. Paradigms, periphrases, and pronominal inflection: A feature-based account. Yearbook of Morphology 1996, 155-180.
17. Brugmann, Karl. 1895. Die mit dem Suffix -to- gebildeten Partizipia im Verbalsystem des Lateinischen und des Umbrisch-Oskischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 5:89-153.
18. Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
19. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992. Morphological theory. London: Routledge.
20. Chantraine, Pierre. 1927. Histoire du parfait grec. Paris: H. Champion.
21. Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, 184-221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.
22. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23. Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15.) MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [To appear in Step by step, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.]
24. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
25. Draeger, Anton. 1878. Historische Syntax der lateinischen Sprache. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
26. Dubinsky, Stanley, and Silvester Ron Simango. 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72:749-781.
27. Elbourne, Paul. 1999. Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. Paper presented at NELS 29 [to appear in the proceedings].
28. Embick, David. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
29. Embick, David. 1998. Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface. In MIT working papers in linguistics 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, 41-72. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
30. Embick, David, and Morris Halle. 1999. The Latin conjugation. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
31. Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 1999. Locality in post-syntactic operations. In MIT working papers in linguistics 34: Papers in morphology and syntax, cycle two, 265-317. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
32. Ernout, Alfred. 1952/1989. Morphologie historique du latin. 4th ed. Paris: Klincksieck.
33. Ernout, Alfred, and François Thomas. 1951. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
34. Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Belles Lettres.
35. Gellius, Aulus. 1927. The Attic nights of Aulus Gellius, with an English translation by John C. Rolfe. London: W. Heinemann.
36. Gildersleeve, Basil, and Gonzalez Lodge. 1895. Latin grammar. London: Macmillan.
37. Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 1991. Toward a syntax of temporal representations. Probus 3:187-213.
38. Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Glare, P. G. W. 1982. Oxford Latin dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Gonda, Jan. 1960a. Reflections on the Indo-European medium I. Lingua 9:30-67.
41. Gonda, Jan. 1960b. Reflections on the Indo-European medium II. Lingua 9:175-193.
42. Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 53-109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
43. Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. In NELS 20, 150-184. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
44. Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In MIT working papers in linguistics 30: Papers at the interface, 425-449. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
45. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111-176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
46. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In MIT working papers in linguistics 21: Papers on phonology and morphology, 275-288. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
47. Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
48. Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 1998. Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: Nominalizations, vocabulary items and the encyclopaedia. In MIT working papers in linguistics 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, 119-138. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
49. Hofmann, Johann Baptist, Manu Leumann, and Anton Szantyr. 1963. Lateinische Grammatik, auf der Grundlage des Werkes von Friedrich Stolz und Joseph Hermann Schmalz: 2. Band Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
50. Hovdhaugen, Even. 1987. Genera verborum quot sunt? Observations on the Roman grammatical tradition. In The history of linguistics in the classical period, ed. Daniel J. Taylor, 133-147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51. Iatridou, Sabine. 1990. About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry 21:551-577.
52. Ippolito, Michela. 1999. On the past participle morphology in Italian. In MIT working papers in linguistics 34: Papers in morphology and syntax, cycle one, 111-138. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
53. Joffre, Marie-Dominique. 1986. La signification temporelle et aspectuelle d l'adjectif en -*to: Réflexions sur l'intégration d'une forme adjective au paradigme verbal. Revue des Études Latines 64:211-222.
54. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1994. Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events. In Voice: Form and function, ed. Barbara Fox and Paul J. Hopper, 179-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. Linguistic Society of Korea, 3-91. Seoul: Hanshin.
57. Klaiman, Miriam H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Kratzer, Angelika. 1993. The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
59. Leumann, Manu, Johann Baptist Hofmann, and Anton Szantyr. 1963. Lateinische Grammatik, auf der Grundlage des Werkes von Friedrich Stolz und Joseph Hermann Schmalz: 1. Band Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
60. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623-661.
61. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
62. Lidz, Jeffrey. 1998. Valency in Kannada: Evidence for interpretive morphology. In UPenn working papers in linguistics 5.2, 37-63. Penn Linguistics Club, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
63. Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. The organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
64. Lindsay, William M. 1915. A short historical Latin grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
66. Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, Morphological Merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Theoretical morphology, ed. Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan, 253-270. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
67. Marantz, Alec. 1989. Projection vs. percolation in the syntax of synthetic compounds. In Selected papers from the Annual Spring Colloquium, 95-112. UNC Linguistics Circle, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
68. Marantz, Alec. 1994. A late note on Late Insertion. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
69. Marantz, Alec. 1995. "Cat" as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of Late Insertion in Distributed Morphology. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
70. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 201-225. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
71. Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. McCartney, Eugene S. 1926. Makeshifts for the passive of deponent verbs in Latin. Philological Quarterly 5:289-298.
73. McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Morphological "anaphora" as syntactic movement. Ms., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
74. Meillet, Antoine. 1966. Esquisse d'une histoire de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
75. Nölting, Theodor. 1859. Über das lateinische Deponens. Wismar.
76. Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
77. Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
78. Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Morphology and its relation to syntax and phonology, ed. Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari, and Patrick Farrell, 264-285. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. [Distributed by Cambridge University Press.]
79. Oltra, Maria Isabel. 1999. On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Master's thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
80. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiences and cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
81. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20:365-424.
82. Sauerland, Uli. To appear. Scope reconstruction without reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 17th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
83. Serbat, Guy. 1980. Le parfait de l'indicatif actif. In Le sens du parfait de l'indicatif actif en latin, ed. Guy Serbat, 1-33. Colloque de Morigny, Université de Paris IV Sorbonne.
84. Sicking, C. M. J., and Peter Stork. 1996. The synthetic perfect in classical Greek. In Two studies in the semantics of the verb in classical Greek, ed. C. M. J. Sicking and Peter Stork, 119-298. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
85. Sihler, Andrew L. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. Sobin, Nicholas. 1985. Case assignment in Ukrainian morphological passive constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 16:649-662.
87. Sommer, Ferdinand. 1914. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
88. Varro, Marcus Terentius. 1938. On the Latin language, with an English translation by Roland G. Kent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
89. Wackernagel, Jakob. 1904. Studien zum griechischen Perfektum. In Kleine Schriften Band II. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Rupprecht.
90. Wackernagel, Jakob. 1920. Vorlesungen über Syntax, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch, und Deutsch. Basel: Philologischen Seminar der Universität Basel.
91. Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In Formal syntax, ed. Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 327-360. New York: Academic Press.