Procedural justice in negotiation: Procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 473-500

  Hollander Blumoff, Rebecca ^a   Tyler, Tom R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43149116337     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: 17474469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00110.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arbuckle, James L., and Werner Wothke. 1999. AMOS 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
2. Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary. 1995. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1 17 (3): 497–529.
3. Bazerman, Max H., and Margaret A Neale. 1983. Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution. In Negotiation in Organizations, ed. Max H. Bazerman and Roy J. Lewicki. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Bazerman, Max H., and Margaret A Neale. 1995. The Role of Fairness Considerations and Relationships in a Judgment Perspective of Negotiation. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. Kenneth J. Arrow, Robert H. Mnookin, Lee Ross, Amos Tversky, and Robert B. Wilson. New York: W.W. Norton.
5. Blount, Sally. 1995. When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effects of Causal Attributions on Preferences. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (2): 131–44.
6. Bolton, Gary E., and Axel Ockenfels. 2000. ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. American Economic Review 100: 166–93.
7. Brockner, Joel, Ya‐Ru Chen, Elizabeth A. Mannix, Kwok Leung, and Daniel P. Skarlicki. 2000. Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do It. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 138–59.
8. Charness, Gary, and Matthew Rabin. 2002. Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 817–69.
9. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and Peter J. Carnevale. 2003. Motivational Bases for Information Processing and Strategic Choice in Conflict and Negotiation. In vol. 35, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press.
10. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Sander L. Koole, and Frans L. Oldersma. 1999. On the Seizing and Freezing of Negotiator Inferences: Need for Cognitive Closure Moderates the Use of Heuristics in Negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (3): 348–62.
11. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Laurie R. Weingart, and Seungwoo Kwon. 2000. Influence of Social Motives on Integrative Negotiation: A Meta‐Analytical Review and Test of Two Theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (5): 889–905.
12. Fehr, Ernst, and Klaus M. Schmidt. 1999. A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–68.
13. Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. 1981. Getting to Yes. New York: Penguin Books.
14. Galanter, Marc. 2002. Changing Legal Consciousness in America: The View from the Joke Corpus. Cardozo Law Review 23: 2223–40.
15. Galanter, Marc, and Mia Cahill. 1994. “Most Cases Settle”: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements. Stanford Law Review 46: 1339–91.
16. Galinsky, Adam D., and Thomas Mussweiler. 2001. First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective‐Taking and Negotiator Focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (4): 657–69.
17. Gilson, Ronald J., and Robert H. Mnookin. 1994. Disputing Through Agents: Cooperation and Conflict Between Lawyers in Litigation. Columbia Law Review 94: 509–66.
18. Guth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger, and Bernd Schwarze. 1982. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–88.
19. Hibbing, John R., and John R. Alford. 2004. Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Cooperators. American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 62–76.
20. Issacharoff, Samuel. 2002. The Content of Our Casebooks: Why Do Cases Get Litigated? Florida State University Law Review 29: 1265–87.
21. Jolls, Christine M., Cass R. Sunstein, and Richard Thaler. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review 50: 1471–1550.
22. Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler. 1990. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1325–48.
23. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1984. Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–50.
24. Korobkin, Russell, and Chris Guthrie. 1994. Psychological Barriers to Litigation Settlement: An Experimental Approach. Michigan Law Review 93: 107–92.
25. Kritzer, Herbert M. 1986. Adjudication to Settlement: Shading in the Gray. Judicature 70: 161–65.
26. Kumar, Rajesh. 2004. The Role of Fairness Considerations and Relationships in a Judgment Perspective of Negotiation. In The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture, ed. Michele J. Gelfand and Jeanne M. Brett. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27. Lax, David A., and James K. Sebenius. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Macmillan.
28. Lind, E. Allan. 2002. Fairness Judgments as Cognitions. In The Justice Motive in Everyday Life, ed. Michael Ross and Dale T. Miller. New York: Cambridge.
29. Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
30. MacCoun, Robert J., and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Basis of Citizens’ Perceptions of the Criminal Jury: Procedural Fairness, Accuracy and Efficiency. Law and Human Behavior 12 (3): 333–52.
31. Mnookin, Robert H., and Lewis Kornhauser. 1979. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. Yale Law Journal 88: 950–97.
32. Mnookin, Robert H., Scott R. Peppet, and Andrew S. Tulumello. 2000. Beyond Winning: Negtotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes. Cambridge: Belknap.
33. Mnookin, Robert H., and Lee Ross. 1995. Introduction. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. Kenneth J. Arrow, Robert H. Mnookin, Lee Ross, Amos Tversky, and Robert B. Wilson. New York: W. W. Norton.
34. Molm, Linda D., Nobuyuki Takahashi, and Gretchen Peterson. 2003. In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange. American Sociological Review 68: 128–52.
35. Posner, Richard A. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen.
36. Priest, George L., and Benjamin Klein. 1984. The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Journal of Legal Studies 13: 1–55.
37. Pruitt, Dean G., Robert S. Peirce, Neil B. McGillicuddy, Gary L. Welton, and Lynn M. Castrianno. 1993. Long‐Term Success in Mediation. Law and Human Behavior 17 (3): 313–30.
38. Pruitt, Dean G., and Peter J. Carnevale. 1993. Negotiation in Social Conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39. Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
40. Ross, Lee. 1995. Reactive Devaluation in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. Kenneth J. Arrow, Robert H. Mnookin, Lee Ross, Amos Tversky, and Robert B. Wilson. New York: W. W. Norton.
41. Shestowsky, Donna. 2004. Procedural Preferences in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 10 (3): 211–49.
42. Simon, Herbert A. 1955. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.
43. Sondak, Harris, and Tom R. Tyler. 2007. How Does Procedural Justice Shape the Desirability of Markets? Journal of Economic Psychology 28 (1): 79–92.
44. Thaler, Richard H. 1994. The Winner's Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker. 1978. A Theory of Procedure. California Law Review 66: 541–66.
46. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Tyler, Tom R. 2000. Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International Journal of Psychology 35 (2): 117–25.
48. Tyler, Tom R., and Steven L. Blader. 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
49. Tyler, Tom R., and Steven L. Blader. 2005. Can Businesses Effectively Regulate Employee Conduct? The Antecedents of Rule Following in Work Settings. Academy of Management Journal 48 (6): 1143–58.
50. Tyler, Tom R., and Robert Folger. 1980. Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction with Citizen‐Police Encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1 (4): 281–92.
51. Tyler, Tom R., and Yuen J. Huo. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and the Courts. New York: Russell Sage.
52. Tyler, Tom R., and E. Allan Lind. 1992. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. In vol. 25, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press.
53. Van den Bos, Kees, and E. Allan Lind. 2002. Uncertainty Management By Means of Fairness Judgments. In vol. 25, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press.
54. Van Lange, Paul A. M. 1999. The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes: An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (2): 337–49.
55. Walton, Richard E., and Robert B. McKersie. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
56. Welsh, Nancy A. 2004. Perceptions of Fairness in Negotiation. Marquette Law Review 87: 753–67.