Personality preferences in laboratory economics experiments

Journal of Socio-Economics

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 998-1009

  Swope, Kurtis J ^a   Cadigan, John ^c   Schmitt, Pamela M ^a   Shupp, Robert ^b  

^a UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

^b BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GETTYSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Experiments; Personality; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049171824     PISSN: 10535357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.065     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ben-Ner A., Kong F., and Putterman L. Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving. Journal of Economic Psychology 25 (2004) 581-589
2. Berg J., Dickhaut J., and McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 122-142
3. Bolton G., and Katok E. An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters 48 (1995) 287-292
4. Boone C., De Branbander B., and van Witteloostuijn A. The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (1999) 343-377
5. Brandstätter H., and Güth W. Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research 10 (2002) 191-215
6. Brown-Kruse J., and Hummels J. Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22 (1993) 255-267
7. Burks S., Carpenter J., and Verhoogen E. Playing both roles in the trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51 (2003) 195-216
8. Cherry T., Kroll S., and Shogren J. The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on contributions in best-shot public good games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57 (2005) 357-365
9. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual (1985), Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
10. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39 (2001) 171-188
11. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal 108 (1998) 726-735
12. Güth W., Schmittberger R., and Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (1982) 367-388
13. Hammer A.L., and Mitchell W. The distribution of MBTI types in the U.S. by gender and ethnic group. Journal of Psychological Type 37 (1996) 2-15
14. Jenkins C.D., Zyzanski S., and Rosenman R. Jenkins Activity Survey Manual (1979), Psychological Corp., NY
15. Jung C.G. Psychological Types (1923), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
16. Kahneman D., Knetsch J., and Thaler R. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business 76 (1986) 798-841
17. Ma L., et al. Altruism and voluntary provision of public goods. Economics Bulletin 3 (2002) 1-8
18. Myers I., McCaulley M., Quenk N., and Hammer A. MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (1998), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA
19. Nowell C., and Tinkler S. The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25 (1994) 25-36
20. Solnick S. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry 39 (2001) 189-200