Dead wood and saproxylic beetles in set-aside and non set-aside forests in a boreal region

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 255, Issue 8-9, 2008, Pages 3340-3350

  Djupström, Line B ^a,b   Weslien, Jan ^a   Schroeder, L Martin ^b  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Picea abies; Red listed species; Reserves; Retention patches; Species richness; Woodland key habitats

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FORESTRY;

RETENTION PATCHES; SPECIES RICHNESS; WOODLAND KEY HABITATS;

WOOD;

BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; HABITAT CONSERVATION; NATURE RESERVE; RED LIST; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FORESTRY; WOOD;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

COLEOPTERA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 43049109077     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Angelstam P., Mikusinski G., Eriksson J.A., Jaxgård P., Kellner O., Koffman A., Ranneby B., Roberge J.M., Rosengren M., Rystedt S., Rönnbäck B.I., and Seibert J. Gap Analysis and Planning of Habitat Networks for the Maintenance of Boreal Forest Biodiversity - A Technical Report from the wRESEx Case Study in Sweden (2003), Centre for Landscape Ecology, Department of Natural Sciences, Örebro University and Department of Conservation Biology, Forest Faculty, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences
2. Anon., 2003. Protected Nature 2003. Statistics Sweden. MI 41 SM 0401 (in Swedish).
3. Anon., 2004. Inventering av nyckelbiotoper - Resultat till och med 2003. Meddelande 4. Skogsstyrelsen, (National Board of Forestry), Jönköping (in Swedish).
4. Cederberg B. Skogsbrukets effekter på rödlistade arter - Artdatabanken rapporterar 4 (2001), The Swedish Species Information Center, SLU, Uppsala (in Swedish)
5. Colwell R.K., Mao C.X., and Chang J. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecol. Soc. Am. 10 (2004) 2717-2727
6. Colwell, R.K., 2005. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7.5. User's Guide and Application available from http://purl.oclc.org/estimates (accessed January 2005).
7. Dahlberg, A., Stokland, J.N., 2004. Vedlevande arters krav på substrat - en sammanställning och analys av 3600 arter. Rapport 7. - Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping (in Swedish).
8. Edgren V., and Nylinder P. Funktioner och tabeller för bestämning av avsmalning och formkvot under bark för tall och gran i norra och södra Sverige. Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut 38 7 (1949) 53 (in Swedish with English summary)
9. Ekbom B., Schroeder L.M., and Larsson S. Stand specific occurrence of coarse woody debris in a managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. Forest Ecol. Manage. 221 1/3 (2006) 2-12
10. Eriksson, H., 1973. Volymfunktioner för stående träd av ask, asp, klibbal och contorta-tall. Institutionen för skogsproduktion, Skogshögskolan. Stockholm. Rapporter och uppsatser. 26, 26 pp. (in Swedish).
11. Fridman J. Conservation of forest in Sweden: a strategic ecological analysis. Biol. Conserv. 96 (2000) 95-103
12. In: Gärdenfors U. (Ed). Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005 - the 2005 Red List of Swedish species (2005), Swedish Threatened Species Unit, SLU, Uppsala (in Swedish with English summary)
13. Gjerde I., Sœtersdal M., and Blom H.H. Complementary Hotspots Inventory - a method for identification of important areas for biodiversity at the forest stand level. Biol. Conserv. 137 (2007) 549-557
14. Gjerde I., Sœtersdal M., Rolstad J., Blom H.H., and Storaunet K.O. Fine-scale diversity and rarity hotspots in Northern forests. Conserv. Biol. 18 (2004) 1032-1042
15. Gotelli N.J., and Colwell R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4 (2001) 379-391
16. Göthlin E., Schroeder L.M., and Lindelöw A. Attacks by Ips typographus and Pityogenes chalcographus on windthrown spruces (Picea abies) during the two years following a storm felling. Scand. J. For. Res. 15 (2000) 542-549
17. Gustafsson L., Appelgren L., Jonsson F., Nordin U., Persson A., and Weslien J.-O. High occurrence of red-listed bryophytes and lichens in mature managed forests in boreal Sweden. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5 (2004) 123-129
18. Gustafsson L., de Jong J., and Norén M. Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens. Biodivers. Conserv. 8 (1999) 1101-1114
19. Gustafsson L., Hylander K., and Jacobson C. Uncommon bryophytes in Swedish forests- key habitats and production forests compared. Forest Ecol. Manage. 194 (2004) 11-22
20. Hägglund B., and Lundmark J.-E. Hanledning i Bonitering med Skogshögskolans Boniteringssystem Del 1,2,3 (1981), Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping (in Swedish)
21. Hazell P., and Gustafsson L. Retention of trees at final harvest-evaluation of a conservation technique using epiphytic bryophyte and lichen transplants. Biol. Conserv. 90 (1999) 133-142
22. Jonsell M., Weslien J., and Ehnström B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 7 (1998) 749-764
23. Jönsson M.T., and Jonsson B.G. Assessing coarse woody debris in Swedish woodland key-habitats: implications for conservation and management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 242 (2007) 363-373
24. Jonsson B.G., Kruys N., and Ranius T. Ecology of species living on dead wood - lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn. 39 (2005) 289-309
25. Juutinen A., Mönkkönen M., and Sippola A.L. Cost-efficiency of decaying wood as a surrogate for overall species richness in boreal forests. Conserv. Biol. 20 (2006) 74-84
26. Kaila L., Martikainen P., and Punttila P. Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 6 (1997) 1-18
27. Kruskal J.B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29 (1964) 115-129
28. Kruys N., and Jonsson B.G. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of northern Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1295-1299
29. Larsson, K., Elander, J., 2004. Management of retention trees and dead wood after final felling in the county of Östergötland, Sweden. Thesis, Dept. of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, University of Linköping, Sweden.
30. Lawrence, J.F., Newton, A.F. Jr., 2005. Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names). In: Pakaluk J., Ślipińksi A.S., (Eds.), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera. Vol. 2. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, pp. 779-1007.
31. Linder P., and Östlund L. Changes in the boreal forests of Sweden 1870-1991. Svensk Bot. Tids. 86 (1992) 199-215 (in Swedish with English summary)
32. Lindhe A., Lindelöw A., and Åsenblad N. Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers. Conserv. 14 (2005) 3033-3053
33. Lundberg S. Catalogus Coleoptorum Sueciae (1995), Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm
34. Martikainen P. Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecol. Bull. 49 (2001) 205-218
35. Mather P.M. Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography (1976), J. Wiley & Sons, London 532 pp
36. McCune B., and Grace J.B. Analysis of Ecological Communities (2002), MjM Software Design, Oregon, USA
37. McCune B., and Mefford M.J. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analyses of Ecological Data. Version 4. 0 (1999), MjM Softvare, Glenden Beach, Oregon, USA
38. Näslund, M., 1947. Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av stående träd: tall, gran och björk I södra Sverige samt i hela landet. Stockholm, Sweden. Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut. 36 (3). pp. 81 (in Swedish with English summary).
39. Niemelä J. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11 (1997) 601-610
40. Nitare J., and Norén M. Key-habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the national Board of Forestry. Svensk Bot. Tids. 86 (1992) 219-226 (in Swedish with English summary)
41. Nordén B., Rydberg M., Götmark F., and Olausson B. Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol. Conserv. 117 (2004) 1-10
42. Norén M., Nitare J., Larsson L., Hultgren S., and Bergengren I. Handbok för inventering av nyckelbiotoper (2002), Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping (in Swedish)
43. Perhans K., Gustafsson L., Jonsson F., Nordin N., and Wiebull H. Bryophytes and lichens in different types of forest set-asides in boreal Sweden. Forest Ecol. Manage. 242 (2007) 374-390
44. Persson, A., Gustafsson, L., 2002. Conservation on final felling in family enterprise forestry. Resultat16/2002, Skogforsk (in Swedish with English abstract).
45. SAS, 2000. SAS OnlineDoc. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
46. Schroeder L.M., Ranius T., Ekbom B., and Larsson S. Recruitment of saproxylic beetles in high stumps created for maintaining biodiversity in a boreal forest landscape. Can. J. For. Res. 36 (2006) 2168-2178
47. Siitonen J., Martikainen P., Punttila P., and Rauh J. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecol. Manage. 128 (2000) 211-225
48. Siitonen J., and Saaristo L. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol. Conserv. 94 (2000) 211-220
49. Similä M., Kouki J., Mönkkönen M., Sippola A.L., and Huhta E. Co variation and indicators of species diversity: can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests?. Ecol. Ind. 6 (2006) 686-700
50. Sippola A.L., Siitonen J., and Punttila P. Beetle diversity in timberline forests: a comparison between old-growth and regeneration areas in Finnish Lapland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39 (2002) 69-86
51. Sœtersdal M., Gjerde I., and Blom H.H. Indicator species and the problem of spatial inconsistency in nestedness patterns. Biol. Conserv. 122 (2005) 305-316
52. Sokal R.R., and Rohlf F.J. Biometry (1969), W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco pp. 222-223
53. Sørensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. (K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. NS). 5 (1948) 1-34
54. Southwood T.R.E., and Henderson P.A. Ecological Methods. 3rd ed. (2000), Blackwell Science, Oxford
55. Sverdrup-Thygeson A. Key habitats in the Norwegian production forest: a case study. Scand. J. For. Res. 17 (2002) 166-178
56. Swedish Forest Agency, 2006. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, Jönköping.