Invertebrates and boreal forest management

Conservation Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 601-610

  Niemela, Jari ^a  

^a Division of Population Biology ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; INVERTEBRATE; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; SPECIES RICHNESS;

FENNOSCANDIAN;

EID: 0031458417     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.06008.x     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Ahnlund, H., and A. Lindhe. 1992. Hotade vedinsekter i barrskogslandskapet-nagra synpimkter utifran studier av sörmländska brandHilt, hällmarker och hyggen. [Endangered wood-living insects in coniferous forests-some thoughts from studies of forest-fire sites, outcrops and clearcuttings in the province of Sörmland, Sweden]. Entomologisk Tidskrift 113:13-23. (In Swedish, with English summary.)
2. Angelstam, P., and P. Rosenberg. 1993. Aldrig, sällan, ibland, ofta. Skog & forskning 1/93:34-41. On Swedish.)
3. Angelstam. P., G. Mikusinski, and S. Travina, editors. 1995. Research in eastern Europe to solve nature conservation problems in the Nordic countries. Report 28. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
4. Anonymous. 1993- Plünderer im Norden. Der Spiegel 46:244-247.
5. Anonymous. 1995. Alue-ckologinen suunnittclu. Alue-ekologiatyöryhmän väliraportti. Metsähallitus, Vantaa, Finland. (In Finnish.)
6. Arnold, G. W. 1995. Incorporating landscape pattern into conservation programs. Pages 309-337 in L. Hansson, L. Fahrig, and G. Merriam, editors. Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman & Hall, London.
7. Atlcgrim, O., and K. Sjöberg. 1995. Effects of clear-cutting and selective felling in Swedish boreal coniferous forest: response of invertebrate taxa eaten by birds. Entomologica Fennica 6:79-90.
8. Atlegrim, O., K. Sjöberg, and J. P. Ball. 1997. Forestry effects on a boeal ground beetle community in spring: selective logging and clear-cutting compared. Entomologica Fennica. In Press.
9. Bader, P., S. Jansson, and B. G. Jonsson. 1995. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biological Conservation 72:355-362.
10. Bauer, L. C. 1989. Moorland beetle communities on limestone 'habitat islands.' I. Isolation, invasion and local species diversity in carabids and staphylinids. Journal of Animal Ecology 58:1077-1098.
11. Berg, A., B. Ehnström, L. Gustafsson, T. Hallingbäck, M. Jonsell, and J. Weslien. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology 8:718-731.
12. Berg, A., B. Ehnström, L. Gustafsson, T. Hallingbäck, M. Jonsell, and J. Weslien. 1995. Threat levels and threats to red-listed species in Swedish forests. Conservation Biology 9:1629-1633-
13. Bradshaw, R., P. Gemmel, and L. Björkman. 1994. Development of nature-based silvicultural models in Southern Sweden: the scientific background. Forest & Landscape-Research 1:95-110.
14. Dahlin, B., and O. Sallnäs. 1994. Landskapsbaserad planering i praktiken. Skog & Forskning 4/94:18-23. On Swedish.)
15. Ehnström, B., U. Gardenfors, and A. Lindelöw. 1993. Rödlistade evertebrater i Sverige 1993. Swedish threatened species unit, Uppsala, Sweden. (In Swedish).
16. Esseen, P-A., B. Ehnström, L. Ericson, and K. Sjöberg. 1992. Boreal forests-the focal habitats of Fennoscandia. Pages 252-325 in L. Hansson, editor. Ecological principles of nature conservation. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
17. Franklin, J. F. 1989. Toward a new forestry. American Forests 95:37-44.
18. Franklin, J. F. 1993- Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes. Ecological Applications 3:202-205.
19. Franklin, J. F. 1995a. Why link species conservation, environmental protection, and resource management? Pages 326-335 in C. G. Jones and J. II. Lawton, editors. Linking species and ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, New York.
20. Franklin, J. F. 1995b. Scientists in wonderland. BioScience 45:S-74-S-78.
21. Fries, C. 1994. Produktion och màngfald förcnade i boreal skog. Skog & Forskning 4/94:32-41. On Swedish.)
22. Gustafsson, L., and I. Eriksson. 1995. Factors of importance for the epiphytic vegetation of aspen Popiilus tremula with special emphasis on bark chemistry and soil chemistry. Journal of Applied Ecology 32:412-424.
23. Ilaila, Y. 1994. Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management. Annales Zoologie! Fennici3Kl):203-217.
24. Haila, Y., 1. K. Hanski, J. Niemelä, P. Punttila, S. Raivio, and H. Tukia. 1994. Forestry and boreal fauna: matching management with natural forest dynamics. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 31:187-202.
25. Haila, Y., L. Kaila, S. Koponen, P. Martikainen, P. Nicmela, P. Punttila, and J. Siitonen. 1995. Effects of different forest management histories on the invertebrate fauna. Pages 29-30 in P. Angelstam, G. Mikusinski and S. Travina, editors. Research in eastern Europe to solve nature conservation problems in the Nordic countries. Report 28. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
26. Haila, Y., D. A. Saunders, and R. J. Hobbs. 1993. What do we presently understand about ecosystem fragmentation? Pages 45-55 in D. A. Saunders, R. J. Hobbs, and P. R. Ehrlich, editors. Nature conservation 3: reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia.
27. Halme, E., and J. Niemelä. 1993. Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forest. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 30:17-30.
28. Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Harris, L. D., and G. Silva-Lopez. 1992. Forest fragmentation and the conservation of biological diversity. Pages 197-237 in P. L. Fiedler and S. K. Jain, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. Chapman and Hall, New York.
30. Hautaluoma, J., and R. Woodmansee. 1994. New roles in ecological research and policy making. Ecology International Bulletin 21:1-10.
31. Heliövaara, K., and R. Väisänen. 1984. Effects of modern forestry on northwestern European forest invertebrates: a synthesis. Acta Forestalia Fennica 189:1-32.
32. Helle, P., and J. Muona. 1985. Invertebrate numbers in edges between clear-fellings and mature forests in northern Finland. Silva Fennica 19(3):281-294.
33. Hunter, M. 1993- Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biological Conservation 65:115-120.
34. Hydén, N., and P. Sjökvist. 1993. Barrskogsfjällflyet, Xestia sinccra (Lepidoptera, Noctuidea), och det moderna storskaliga skogsbruket. (Xestia sinccra [Lepidoptera, Noctuidea] and the modern large scale forestry). Entomologisk Tidskrift 114:1 -11. (I . vedish, with English summary.)
35. Irwin, L. L., and T. B. Wigley. 1993. Toward an experimental basis for protecting forest wildlife. Ecological Applications 3:213-217.
36. Kaila, L., P. Martikainen, P. Punttila, and E. Yakovlev. 1994. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on dead birch trunks decayed by different polypore species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:97-107.
37. Kaila, L, P. Martikainen, and P. Punttila. 1997. Dead trees left in clearcuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:1-18.
38. Kim, K. C. 1993. Biodiversity, conservation and inventory: why insects matter. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:191-214.
39. Korhonen, K.-M., editor. 1994. Forestry environment guide. Finnish Forest and Park Service, Vantaa.
40. Kouki, J., editor. 1994. Biodiversity in the Fennoscandian boreal forests: natural variation and its management. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:1-217.
41. Koivula, M. 1996. Lehtikarikkeen lisäämisen vaikutus MT-metsan maakiitäjäisten runsauteen. M. S. thesis. University of Helsinki, Helsinki. On Finnish.)
42. Kremen, C., R. K. Colwell, T. L. Erwin, D. D. Murphy, R. F. Noss, and M. A. Sanjayan. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7:796-808.
43. Kuusinen, M. 1994rt. Epiphytic lichen diversity on Salix caprca in old-growth southern and middle boreal forests of Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 31:77-92.
44. Kuusinen, M. 1994k. Epiphytic lichen flora and diversity on Poptilits treimila in old-growth and managed forests of southern and middle boreal Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 31:245-260.
45. Kuusipalo, J-, and J. Kangas. 1994. Managing biodiversity in a forestry environment. Conservation Biology 8:450-460.
46. Laaka, S. 1992. The threatened epixylic bryophytes in old primeval forests in Finland. Biological Conservation 59:151-154.
47. Lindelöw, A. 1990. Habitatral och säsongsaktivitet hos Agoninii mannerhelmli (Coleoptera, Carabidae) i en uppländsk sumpskog. (Habitat preferences and seasonal activity of Agoiiutn mannerbcimii [Coleoptera, Carabidae] in a Swedish spruce bog). Entomologisk Tidskrift 111:163-166. On Swedish, with English summary.)
48. Loreau, M. 1994. Ground beetles in a changing environment: determinants of species diversity and community assembly. Pages 77-98 in T. J. B. Boyle and C. E. B. Boyle, editors. Biodiversity, temperate ecosystems, and global change. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
49. Lubchenco, J. 1995. The role of science in formulating a biodiversity strategy. BioScience 45:S-7-S-9.
50. Martikainen, P., J. Siitonen, L. Kaila., and P. Punttila. 1996. Intensity of forest management and bark beetles in non epidemic conditions: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Journal of Applied Entomology 120:257-264.
51. Manila, T. 1989. Maanilviäisten csiintyminen vanlian metsän saarekkeissa Pohjois-Ilämeessä. M. S. thesis. Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. On Finnish.)
52. Miller, J. C. 1993. Insect natural history-, multi-species interactions and biodiversity' in ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:233-241.
53. Mönkkönen, M. 1994. Diversity patterns in Palearctic and Nearctic forest bird assemblages. Journal of Biogeography 21:183-195.
54. Muona, J., and I. Rutanen. 1994. The short-term impact of fire on the beetle fauna in boreal coniferous forest. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 31:109-121.
55. Niemelä, J. 1990. Spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga: a question of scale. Pages 143-155 in N. Stork, editor. Ground beetles: their role in ecological end environmental studies. Intercept Publications, Andover, England.
56. Niemelä, J. 1993. Mystery of the missing species: species-abundance distribution of boreal ground-beetles. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 30:169-172.
57. Niemelä, J., Y. Haila, E. Halme, T. Pajunen, P. Punttila, and II. Tukia. 1987. Habitat preferences and conservation status of Agöiiitin inaniierbeiiiiii Dej. in Ilame, southern Finland. Notulae Entomologicae 67:175-179.
58. Niemelä, J., Y. Haila, E. Halme, T. Lahti, T. Pajunen, and P. Punttila. 1988. The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forest. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 25:107-119.
59. Niemelä, J., Y. Haila, E. Halme, T. Pajunen, and P. Punttila. 1992. Smallscale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. Journal of Biogeography 19:173-181.
60. Niemelä, J., J. R. Spence, and D. H. Spence. 1992&. Habitat associations and seasonal activity of ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in central Alberta. Canadian Entomologist 124:521-540.
61. Niemelä, J., Y. Haila, and P. Punttila. 1996. The importance of smallscale heterogeneity in boreal forests: diversity variation in forestfloor invertebrates across the successional gradient. Ecography 19: 352-368.
62. Niemelä, J., D. Langor, and J. R. Spence. 1993. Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conservation Biology 7:551-561.
63. Niemelä, J., J. R. Spence, D. Langor, Y. Haila, and H. Tukia. 1994. Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: implications for conservation. Pages 29-50 in K. Gaston, M. Samways and T. New, editors. Perspectives in insect conservation. Intercept Publications, Andover, England.
64. Niemclä J., H. Tukia, and E. Halme. 1994k. Patterns of carabicl diversity in Finnish mature taiga. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 31:123-129.
65. Noss R. F. 1992. Issues of scale in conservation biology. Pages 239-250 in P. L. Fiedler and S. K.Jain, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. Chapman and Hall, New York.
66. Noss, R. F., and A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving natures legacy. Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
67. Noss, R. F., and D. D. Murphy. 1995. Endangered species left homeless in Sweet Home. Conservation Biology 9:229-231.
68. kland, D. 1994- Mycetophilidae (Diptera), an insect group vulnerable to forestry practices? A comparison of clearcut, managed and seminatural spruce forests in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:68-85.
69. kland, B., A. Bakkc, S. Hägvar, T. Kvamme. 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 5j 75-100.
70. Paalamo, P. 1995. Pintakasvillisuuden lajimäärät. Pages 48-53 in S. Raivio, editor. Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankecn väliraportti (Nature conservation in managed forests-a preliminary report.) Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43. Vantaa, Finland. (In Finnish.)
71. Paalamo, P. 1995&. Sienilajisto. Pages 54-63 in S. Raivio, editor. Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankeen väliraportti (Nature conservation in managed forests-a preliminary report). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43. Vantaa, Finland. On Finnish.)
72. Pajunen, T. 1995. Hämähäkkilajisto metsäsukkessiossa. Pages 97-102 in S. Raivio, editor. Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-ylueistutkimushankeen väliraportti (Nature conservation in managed forests-a preliminary report). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43. Vantaa, Finland. (In Finnish.)
73. Pajunen, T., Y. Haila, E. Halme, J. Niemclä, and P. Punttila. 1995. Ground-dwelling spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) in fragments of old forest and surrounding managed forests in southern Finland. Ecography 18:62-72.
74. Penttilä, R. 1991. Kääpälajiston esiintyminen käsittelytavoiltaan erilaisissa metsissä Keski-Suomessa. M. S. thesis. Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
75. Penttilä, R. 1995. Käävät. Pages 64-73 in S. Raivio, editor. Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankeen väliraportti (Nature conservation in managed forests-a preliminary report). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43. Vantaa, Finland. On Finnish.)
76. Pressey, R. L., C. J. Humphries, C. R. Margules, R. I. Vane-Wright, and P. H. Williams. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8:124-128.
77. Punttila, P. 1996. Succession, forest fragmentation, and the distribution of wood ants. Oikos 75:291-298.
78. Punttila, P., Y. Haila, J. Niemelä, and T. Pajunen. 1994. Ant communities in fragments of old-growth taiga and managed surroundings. Annales Zoologie! Fennici 31:131-144.
79. Punttila, P., Y. Haila, T. Pajunen, and H. Tukia. 1991. Colonisation of clearcut forests by ants in southern Finland: a quantitative survey. Oikos 61:250-262.
80. Rassi, P., H. Kaipiainen, I. Mannerkoski, and G. Stahls. 1991. Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien seurantatoimikunnan mietinto (Report on the monitoring of threatened animals and plants in Finland; English abstract). Committee report 1991:30, Ministry of Environment, Helsinki. On Finnish, with English summary.)
81. Rutanen, I. 1994. Xylettntis tremulicola (Coleoptera, Anobiidae) found in Finland. Entomologica Fennica 5:201-202.
82. Samuelsson, J., L. Gustafsson, and T. Ingelüg. 1994. Dying and dead trees-a review of their importance for biodiversity. Swedish threatened species unit, Uppsala.
83. Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5:18-32.
84. Schneider, D. C. 1995. Quantitative ecology'. Spatial and temporal scaling. Academic Press, San Diego.
85. Siitonen, J. 1993. Faunistic records of Carabidae and Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) caught by pitfall trapping in western Finnish Lapland. Entomologica Fennica 4:225-231.
86. Siitonen, J. 199-1. Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Annales Zoologi Fennici 31:89-95.
87. Siitonen, J., and P. Martikainen. 1994. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Popnltis trcmtila: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9:185-191.
88. Siitonen, J., P. Martikainen, L. Kaila, A. Nikula, and P. Punttila. 1995. Kovakuoriaislajiston monimuotoisuus eri tavoin käsiteUyillä metsäalueilla Suomessa ja Karjalan tasavallassa. Pages 43-63 in S. Hannelius and P. Niemela, editors. Monimuotoisuus metsien hoidossa. Alctsantutkimuslaitoksen tiedonatoja 564. Metsantutkimuslaitos, Vantaa, Finland. On Finnish.)
89. Spence, J. R., D. W. Langor, J. K. Niemela, H. Carcamo, and C. R. Currie. 1996. Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33:173-184.
90. Swanson, F. J., and J. F. Franklin. 1992. New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest forests. Ecological Applications 2:262-274.
91. Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. ONeill. 1995. Ecological dynamics at broad scale. BioScience 45:S-29-S-35.
92. Usher, M. 1992. Management and diversity of arthropods in Calliina heathland. Biodiversity and Conservation 1:63-79.
93. Usher, M., J. P. Field, and S. E. Bedford. 1993. Biogeography and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods in farm woodlands. Biodiversity Letters 1:54-62.
94. Valovirta, I. 1968. Land molluscs in relation to acidity on hyperite hills in central Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 5:245-253.
95. Väisänen, R. 1995. Perhosct. Pages 103-108 in S. Raivio, editor. Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankeen valiraportti (Nature conservation in managed forests-a preliminary report). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A: 43. Vantaa, Finland. (In Finnish.)
96. Vaisänen, R., O. Biström, and K. Heliövaara. 1993- Subcortical Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces: is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests? Biodiversity and Conservation 2:95113-
97. Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060-2068.
98. Warren, M. S., and R. S. Key. 1991. Woodlands: past, present and potential for insects. Pages 155-211 in N. M. Collins and J. A. Thomas, editors. The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London.
99. Webb, N. R., and P. J. Hopkins. 1984. Invertebrate diversity on fragmented Callluna-heathland. Journal of Applied Ecology 21:921-933.
100. Wilcove, D. S. 1994. Turning conservation goals into tangible results: the case of the spotted owl and old-growth forests. Pages 313-329 in P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb, editors. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Science, London.
101. Wikars, L-O. 1992. Skogsbränder och insektcr. (Forest fires and insects.) Entomologisk tidskrift 113:1-11. On Swedish, with English summary.)
102. Wikars, L-O. 1995. Clear-cutting before burning prevents establishment of the fire-adapted Agoniitn quatlripunctatum (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici 32:375-384.