Assessing coarse woody debris in Swedish woodland key habitats: Implications for conservation and management

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 242, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 363-373

  Jönsson, Mari T ^a   Jonsson, Bengt Gunnar ^a  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity Monitoring Programme; Dead wood; Forest remnants; National Forest Inventory; Set asides; Snags

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; SOFTWOODS;

BIODIVERSITY MONITORING PROGRAMME; DEAD WOODS; FOREST REMNANTS; NATIONAL FOREST INVENTORY;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMONITORING; BOREAL FOREST; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; FOREST INVENTORY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT CONSERVATION; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; SNAG; WOODLAND;

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTRY; PICEA;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

PICEA;

EID: 34047151187     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.054     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aasaaren, Ø., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., 1994. Nøkkelbiotoper i skogen. NORSKOG, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian).
2. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., and Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in north-western Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5 (1968) 169-211
3. Anonymous, 1997. Naturskydd och naturhänsyn i skogen. Meddelande 1 1997. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish).
4. Anonymous, 1998. Avverkning av skogsmiljöer med rödlistade arter-en undersökning från åren 1994-1996. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
5. Anonymous, 2001. Gov. Bill 2000/01:130. The Swedish environmental objectives-interim targets and action strategies. The Ministry of the Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 46-49.
6. Anonymous, 2002. The Swedish Woodland Key Habitats Survey. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden.
7. Anonymous, 2005. Swedish FSC-standard for Forest Certification. The Swedish FSC Council, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish).
8. Aune K., Jonsson B.G., and Moen J. Isolation and edge effects among woodland key habitats in Sweden: is forest policy promoting fragmentation?. Biol. Conserv. 124 (2005) 89-95
9. Bader P., Jansson S., and Jonsson B.G. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forest. Biol. Conserv. 72 (1995) 355-362
10. Berg A., Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M., and Weslien J. Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8 (1994) 718-731
11. Berglund H., and Jonsson B.G. Verifying an extinction debt among lichens and fungi in northern Swedish boreal forests. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005) 338-348
12. Christensen M., Hahn K., Mountford E.P., Ódor P., Standovár T., Rozenbergar D., Diaci J., Wijdeven S., Meyer P., Winter S., and Vrska T. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For. Ecol. Manage. 210 (2005) 267-282
13. Dahlberg, A., Stokland, J.N., 2004. Vedlevande arters krav på substrat-sammanställning och analys av 3600 arter. Rapport 2004:7. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish with summary in English).
14. De Jong, J., Almstedt, M., 2005. Död ved i levande skogar. Rapport 5413. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish with summary in English).
15. Ekbom B., Schroeder L.M., and Larsson S. Stand specific occurrence of course woody debris in managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 221 (2006) 2-12
16. Ericsson T.S., Berglund H., and Östlund L. History and forest biodiversity of woodland key habitats in south boreal Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 122 (2005) 289-303
17. Esseen P.-A., Ehnström B., Ericson L., and Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46 (1997) 16-47
18. Fridman J., and Walheim M. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 131 (2000) 23-36
19. Gärdenfors U. The 2005 Red List of Swedish Species (2005), Swedish Species Information Centre, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden
20. Gibb H., Ball J.P., Johansson T., Atlegrim O., Hjältén J., and Danell K. Effects of management on coarse woody debris volume and composition in boreal forests in northern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 20 (2005) 213-222
21. Green P., and Peterken G.F. Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK-in relation to the intensity of management. For. Ecol. Manage. 98 (1997) 229-238
22. Gu W., Heikkilä R., and Hanski I. Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes. Land. Ecol. 17 (2002) 699-710
23. Gustafsson, J., 2001. Miljöövervakning av biologisk mångfald i nyckelbiotoper. Meddelande 5 2001. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish with English summary).
24. Gustafsson L., De Jong J., and Noren M. Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens. Biodiver. Conserv. 8 (1999) 1101-1114
25. Hagan J.M., and Grove S.L. Coarse woody debris. J. Forest. 97 (1999) 6-11
26. Hanski I. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modeling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Ann. Zool. Fennici 37 (2000) 271-280
27. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin J.D., Anderson N.H., Cline S.P., Aumen N.G., Sedell J.R., Lienkaemper G.W., Cromack K., and Cummis K.W. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15 (1986) 133-302
28. Johansson, T., 2006. The conservation of saproxylic species in boreal forests: importance of forest management and dead wood characteristics. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
29. Jonsell M., Weslien J., and Ehnström B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiv. Conserv. 7 (1998) 749-764
30. Jonsson B.G. Availability of coarse woody debris in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J. Veg. Sci. 11 (2000) 51-56
31. In: Jonsson B.G., and Kruys N. (Eds). Ecology of wood debris in boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. (2001) 49
32. Jonsson B.G., Kruys N., and Ranius T. Ecology of species living on dead wood-lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn. 39 (2005) 289-309
33. Junninen K., and Kouki J. Are woodland key habitats in Finland hotspots for polypores (Basidiomycota)?. Scand J. For. Res. 21 (2006) 32-40
34. Karjalainen L., and Kuuluvainen T. Amount and diversity of coarse woody debris within a boreal forest landscape dominated by Pinus sylvestris in Vienansalo wilderness, eastern Fennoscandia. Silva Fenn. 36 (2002) 147-167
35. Kirby K.J., Reid C.M., Thomas R.C., and Goldsmith F.B. Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 35 (1998) 148-155
36. Larsson S., and Danell K. Science and the management of boreal forest biodiversity. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3 (2001) 5-9
37. Lindblad I. Wood-inhabiting fungi on fallen logs of Norway spruce: relations to forest management and substrate quality. Nord. J. Bot. 18 (1998) 243-255
38. Linder P., and Östlund L. Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes 1885-1996. Biol. Conserv. 85 (1998) 9-19
39. Näslund, M., 1947. Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av stående träd: tall, gran och björk i södra Sverige samt i hela landet. Meddelande från statens skogsforskningsinstitut. Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
40. Niemelä J. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11 (1997) 601-610
41. Nilsson S.G. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecol. Bull. 46 (1997) 61-71
42. Nilsson S.G., Niklasson M., Hedin J., Aronsson G., Gutowski J.M., Linder P., Ljungberg H., Mikusinski G., and Ranius T. Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 161 (2002) 189-204
43. Nitare J., and Norén M. Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i nytt projekt vid Skogsvårdsstyrelsen. Svensk Bot. Tids. 86 (1992) 219-226 (in Swedish with summary in English)
44. Nordèn B., Ryberg M., Götmark F., and Olausson B. Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol. Conserv. 117 (2004) 1-10
45. Norén, M., Hultgren, B., Nitare, J. Bergengren, I., 1995. Instruktioner för datainsamling vid inventering av nyckelbiotoper. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish).
46. Ohlson M., Söderström L., Hörnberg G., Zackrisson O., and Hermansson J. Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv. 81 (1997) 221-231
47. Östlund, L., 1993. Exploitation and structural changes in the north Swedish boreal forest 1800-1992. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
48. Penttilä R., Siitonen J., and Kuusinen M. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 117 (2004) 271-283
49. Perhans, K., 2003. Avverkning i nyckelbiotoper-en fältstudie i norra Stockholms län. Masters Thesis. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish, with summary in English).
50. Ranius T., and Kindvall O. Modelling the amount of coarse woody debris produced by the new biodiversity-oriented silvicultural practices in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 119 (2004) 51-59
51. Ranneby, B., Cruse, T., Hägglund, B., Jonasson, H., Swärd, J., 1987. Designing a new national forest survey for Sweden. Studia Forestalia Suecica No. 177, p. 29.
52. Rouvinen S., and Kuuluvainen T. Amount and spatial distribution of standing and downed dead trees in two areas of different fire history in a boreal Scots pine forest. Ecol. Bull. 49 (2001) 115-127
53. Rouvinen S., Kuuluvainen T., and Karjalainen L. Coarse woody debris in old Pinus sylvestris dominated forests along a geographic and human impact gradient in boreal Fennoscandia. Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 2184-2200
54. Samuelsson J., Gustafsson L., and Ingelög T. Dying and Dead Trees-A Review of their Importance for Biodiversity (1994), Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Uppsala
55. Siitonen J. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49 (2001) 11-41
56. Siitonen J., Martikainen P., Punttila P., and Rauh J. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 128 (2000) 211-225
57. Sippola A.L., Siitonen J., and Kallio R. Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scand. J. For. Res. 13 (1998) 204-214
58. Sohlberg S. Evaluation of Woodland Key Habitat Inventories in the Baltic Countries (2004), The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
59. Ståhl G., Ringvall A., and Fridman J. Assessment of coarse woody debris: a methodological overview. Ecol. Bull. 49 (2001) 57-70
60. Tenhola T., and Yrjönen K. Biological diversity in the Finnish private forests: survey of valuable habitats (2000), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Helsinki, Finland
61. Uotila A., Maltamo M., Uuttera J., and Isomäki A. Stand structure in semi-natural and managed forests in eastern Finland and Russian Karelia. Ecol. Bull. 49 (2001) 149-158
62. von Euler F. Övervakning av biologisk mångfald i skogen: En jämförelse av två metoder (2003), The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish)
63. Warren M.S., and Key R.S. Woodlands: past, present and potential for insects. In: Collins N.M., and Thomas J.A. (Eds). The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats (1991), Academic Press, London 155-211
64. Wikström P., and Eriksson L.O. Solving the stand management problem under biodiversity-related considerations. For. Ecol. Manage. 126 (2000) 361-376
65. Yrjönen, K., 2004. Kartläggning av de särskilt viktiga livsmiljöer som nämns i skogslagen. Slutrapport, 9a/2004. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Helsinki, Finland (in Swedish).