Recruitment of saproxylic beetles in high stumps created for maintaining biodiversity in a boreal forest landscape

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 2168-2178

  Schroeder, Leif Martin ^a   Ranius, Thomas ^a   Ekbom, Barbara ^a   Larsson, Stig ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEBRIS; SAMPLING; WOOD PRODUCTS;

COARSE WOODY DEBRIS (CWD); LANDSCAPES; SAPROXYLIC SPECIES;

FORESTRY;

BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; CLEARCUTTING; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; CONIFEROUS TREE; RECRUITMENT; SAPROXYLIC ORGANISM;

FIBER DEBRIS; INSECTS; PICEA; PINUS; STAMPS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

COLEOPTERA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 33845673718     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X06-119     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abrahamsson, M., and Lindbladh, M. 2006. A comparison of saproxylic beetle occurrence between man-made high- and low-stumps of spruce (Picea abies). For. Ecol. Manage. 226: 230-237.
2. Anonymous. 2000. Svensk FSC-standard för certifiering av skogsbruk. Svenska FSC-rådet, Uppsala, Sweden.
3. Anonymous. 2005. Skogsstatistisk årsbok [Statistical yearbook of forestry. [In Swedish with English summary.] Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden.
4. Boleyn, P., Wold, E., and Byford, K. 2002. Created snag monitoring on the Willamette national forest. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-181. pp. 765-775.
5. Brandeis, T.J., Newton, M., Filip, G.M., and Cole, E.C. 2002. Cavity-nester habitat development in artificially made Douglas-fir snags. J. Wildl. Manage. 66: 625-633.
6. Chambers, C.L., Carrigan, R., Sabin, T.E., Tappeiner, J., and McComb, W.C. 1997. Use of artificially created Douglas-fir snags by cavity-nesting birds. West. J. Appl. For. 12: 93-97.
7. Dahlberg, A., and Stokland, J.N. 2004. Vedlevande arters krav på substrat - sammanställning och analys av 3600 arter. [In Swedish with English summary.] Skogsstyrelsen, Rapp. 7-2004.
8. Ekbom, B., Schroeder, L.M., and Larsson, S. 2006. Stand specific occurrence of coarse woody debris in a managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 221: 2-12.
9. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., and Sjöberg, K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46: 16-47.
10. Fossli, T.-E., and Andersen, J. 1998. Host preference of Cisidae (Coleoptera) on tree-inhabiting fungi in northern Norway. Entomol. Fenn. 9: 65-78.
11. Fridman, J., and Walheim, M. 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 131: 23-36.
12. Grove, S.J. 2002. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 1-23.
13. Gullison, R.E. 2003. Does certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx, 37: 153-165.
14. Gärdenfors, U. 2005. The 2005 red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
15. Hallett, J.G., Lopez, T., O'Connell, M.A., and Borysewicz, M.A. 2001. Decay dynamics and avian use of artificially created snags. Northwest Sci. 75: 378-386.
16. Harmon, M.E. 2002. Moving towards a new paradigm for woody detritus management. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-181. pp. 929-944.
17. Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D., Anderson, N.H., Cline, S.P., Aumen, N.G., Sedell. J.R., Lienkaemper, G.W., Cromack, K., Jr., and Cummins, K.W. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 133-302.
18. Hilszczanski, J., Gibb, H., Hjältén, J., Atlegrim, O., Johansson, T., Pettersson, R.B., Ball, J.P., and Danell, K. 2005. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) of saproxylic beetles are affected by forest successional stage and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forest. Biol. Conserv. 126: 456-464.
19. Holland, J.D., Bert, D.G., and Fahrig, L. 2004. Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat. BioScience, 54: 227-233.
20. Jonsell, M., and Weslien, J. 2003. Felled or standing retained wood - it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For. Ecol. Manage. 175: 425-435.
21. Jonsell, M., Nittérus, K., and Stighäll, K. 2004. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 118: 163-173.
22. Jonsell, M., Schroeder, L.M., and Weslien, J. 2005. Saproxylic beetles in high stumps of spruce - fungal flora important for determining the species composition. Scand. J. For. Res. 20: 54-62.
23. Kouki, J., Löfman, S., Martikainen, P., Rouvinen, S., and Uotila, A. 2001. Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3. pp. 27-37.
24. Larsson, S., Ekbom, B., Schroeder, L.M., and McGeoch, M. 2006. Saproxylic beetles in a Swedish boreal forest landscape managed according to New Forestry. In Proceedings of a Symposium for the 22nd International Congress of Entomogy: Insect Biodiversity and Dead Wood, 15-21 August 2004, Brisbane, Australia. Edited by S.J. Grove and J.L. Hanula. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-93. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, N.C.
25. Lindenmayer, D.B., and Franklin, J.F. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
26. Lindhe, A., and Lindelöw, Å. 2004. Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. For. Ecol. Manage. 203: 1-20.
27. Lindhe, A., Åsenblad, N., and Toresson, H.-G. 2004. Cut logs and high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak - nine years of saproxylic fungi succession. Biol. Conserv. 119: 443-454.
28. Lindhe, A., Lindelöw, Å., and Åsenblad, N. 2005 Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood - density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers. Conserv. 14: 3033-3053.
29. Marshall, P.L., Davis, G., and LeMay, V.M. 2000. Using line intersect sampling for coarse woody debris. Forest Research Tech. Rep., Vancouver Forest Region, TR-003 Ecology. Forest Service, British Columbia.
30. Östlund, L., Zackrisson, O., and Axelsson, A.-L. 1997. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1198-1206.
31. Pedlar, J.H., Pearce, J.L., Venier, L.A., and McKenney, D.W. 2002. Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 158: 189-194.
32. Ranius, T. 2000. Minimum viable metapopulation size of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Anim. Conserv. 3: 37-43.
33. Ranius, T., Kindvall, O., Kruys, N., and Jonsson, B.G. 2003. Modelling dead wood in Norway spruce stands subject to different management regimes. For. Ecol. Manage. 182: 13-29.
34. Ryman, S.-G., Holmåsen, I. 1986. Svampar - en fälthandbok. Interpublishing, Stockholm, Sweden.
35. Shea, P.J., Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., Ferrell, G., and Borys, R. 2002. Girdled versus bar beetle-created ponderosa pine snags: utilization by cavity-dependent species and differences in decay rate and insect diversity. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-1. pp. 145-153.
36. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forest as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
37. Siitonen, J., and Saaristo, L. 2000. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol. Conserv. 94: 211-220.
38. Similä, M., Kouki, J., and Martikainen, P. 2003. Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters. For. Ecol. Manage. 174: 365-381.
39. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., and Lindenmayer, D.B. 2002. Ecological continuity and assumed indicator fungi in boreal forest: the importance of the landscape matrix. For. Ecol. Manage. 174: 353-363.
40. Wikars, L., Sahlin, E., and Ranius, T. 2005. A comparison of three methods to estimate species richness of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in logs and high stumps of Norway spruce. Can. Entomol. 137: 304-324.
41. Økland, B., Bakke, A., Hågvar, S., and Kvamme, T. 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 75-100.