Bryophytes and lichens in different types of forest set-asides in boreal Sweden

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 242, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 374-390

  Perhans, Karin ^a   Gustafsson, Lena ^a   Jonsson, Fredrik ^b   Nordin, Ulrika ^b   Weibull, Henrik ^c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Naturcentrum AB ^*  (Sweden)

^c Naturcentrum AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conservation strategy; Indicator species; Nature reserve; Red listed species; Retention group; Woodland key habitat

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; SUBSTRATES; SWEDEN;

CONSERVATION STRATEGY; INDICATOR SPECIES; NATURE RESERVES; RED LISTED SPECIES; RETENTION GROUPS; WOODLAND KEY HABITATS;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; BRYOPHYTE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; LICHEN; NATURE RESERVE; RED LIST; SET-ASIDE; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES INVENTORY; WOODLAND;

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTS; SUBSTRATES; SWEDEN;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; PICEA;

EID: 34047197226     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.055     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., and Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in north-western Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5 (1968) 169-211
2. Angelstam P., Mikusinski G., Eriksson J.A., Jaxgård P., Kellner O., Koffman A., Ranneby B., Roberge J.M., Rosengren M., Rystedt S., Rönnbäck B.-I., and Seibert J. Gap analysis and planning of habitat networks for the maintenance of boreal forest biodiversity-a technical report from the RESE case study in the counties of Dalarna and Gävleborg. (2003), Department of Natural Sciences, Örebro University and Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
3. Aubry K.B., Amaranthus M.P., Halpern C.B., White J.D., Woodard B.L., Peterson C.E., Laqoudakis C.A., and Horton A.J. Evaluating the effects of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention: experimental design of the DEMO study. Northwest Sci. 73 (1999) 12-26 (Special)
4. Bengtsson J., Angelstam P., Elmqvist T., Emanuelsson U., Folke C., Ihse M., Moberg F., and Nyström M. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32 (2003) 389-396
5. Berglund H., and Jonsson B.G. Verifying an extinction debt among lichens and fungi in northern Swedish boreal forests. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005) 338-348
6. Chen J., Franklin J.F., and Spies T.A. Growing season microclimatic gradients from clearcut edges into into old-growth douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 74-86
7. Colwell, R.K., 2005. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 7.5. Available at http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates.
8. Diamond J.M. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Conserv. 7 (1975) 129-146
9. Esseen P.-A., Ehnström B., Ericson L., and Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46 (1997) 16-47
10. FAO, 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper 147. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
11. Franklin J.F., Lindenmayer D., MacMahon J., McKee A., Magnuson J., Perry D.A., Waide R., and Foster D. Threads of continuity. Ecosystem disturbance, recovery, and the theory of biological legacies. Conserv. Pract. 1 (2000) 8-16
12. In: Gärdenfors U. (Ed). The 2005 Red List of Swedish species (2005), Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala
13. Gotelli N.J., and Colwell R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4 (2001) 379-391
14. Götmark F., and Thorell M. Size of nature reserves: densities of large trees and dead wood indicate high value of small conservation forests in southern Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 1271-1285
15. Gustafsson L., Hylander K., and Jacobson C. Uncommon bryophytes in Swedish forests-key habitats and production forests compared. For. Ecol. Manage. 194 (2004) 11-22
16. Hallingbäck T., and Weibull H. En värdepyramid för naturvårdsbedömning av ädellövskog. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 90 (1996) 129-140 (In Swedish with English summary)
17. Hanski I. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. Hazell P., and Gustafsson L. Retention of trees at final harvest-evaluation of a conservation technique using epiphytic bryophyte and lichen transplants. Biol. Conserv. 90 (1999) 133-142
19. Hilmo O., and Holien H. Epiphytic lichen response to the edge environment in a boreal Picea abies forest in central Norway. The Bryologist 105 (2002) 48-56
20. Hylander, K., 2004. Living on the edge: effectiveness of buffer strips in protecting biodiversity in boreal riparian forests. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Sweden.
21. ILOG. CPLEX System 9.1 (2005), ILOG, Gentilly
22. Johansson P., and Gustafsson L. Red-listed and indicator lichens in woodland key habitats and production forests in Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 1617-1628
23. Kaila L., Martikainen P., and Punttila P. Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 6 (1997) 1-18
24. Krok T.O.B., and Almqvist S. Svensk flora: Fanerogamer och ormbunksväxter. 28th ed. (2001), Liber Utbildning, Stockholm (in Swedish)
25. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
26. MacArthur R.H., and Wilson E.O. The theory of island biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology No. 1 (1967), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
27. McCune B., and Mefford M.J. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4 (1999), MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Orgeon, USA
28. Nelson C.R., and Halpern C.B. Short-term effects of timber harvest and forest edges on ground-layer mosses and liverworts. Can. J. Bot. 83 (2005) 610-620
29. In: Nitare J. (Ed). Signalarter. Indikatorer på skyddsvärd skog. Flora över kryptogamer (2000), Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping (in Swedish)
30. Nitare J., and Norén M. Woodland key habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the Swedish National Board of Forestry. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 86 (1992) 219-226 (in Swedish with English summary)
31. Norén M., Nitare J., Larsson A., Hultgren B., and Bergengren I. Handbok för Inventering av Nyckelbiotoper (2002), Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping (in Swedish)
32. Östlund L., Zackrisson O., and Axelsson A.-L. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 1198-1206
33. Possingham H., Ball I., and Andelman S. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S., and Burgman M. (Eds). Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York 291-305
34. Quinn G.P., and Keough M.J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Ranius T., and Kindvall O. Extinction risk of wood-living model species in forest landscapes as related to forest history and conservation strategy. Landscape Ecol. 21 (2006) 687-698
36. RIS. Riksinventering av skog Fältinstruktion 2005 (2005), Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics and Department of Forest Soils, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (in Swedish)
37. Rodrigues A.S.L., Orestes Cerdeira J., and Gaston K.J. Flexibility, efficiency and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23 (2000) 565-574
38. Rodrigues A.S.L., Gaston K.J., and Gregory R.D. Using presence-absence data to establish reserve selection procedures that are robust to temporal species turnover. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 267 (2000) 897-902
39. Santesson R., Moberg R., Nordin A., Tønsberg T., and Vitikainen O. Lichen-forming and Lichenicolous Fungi of Fennoscandia. Museum of Evolution (2004), Uppsala University
40. SAS. SAS OnlineDoc. Version 8 (2000), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
41. Shackleton C.M. Comparison of plant diversity in protected and communal lands in the Bushbuckridge lowveld savanna South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 94 (2000) 273-285
42. Swedish Forest Agency, 2006. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, Jönköping.
43. Söderström L., and Hedenäs L. Checklist of Swedish bryophytes. Myrinia 8 (1998) 58-90
44. Svedlund L., and Löfgren R. Protecting the Forests of Sweden: Legal Protection in the Form of National Parks, Nature Reserves, Habitat Protection Areas and Nature Conservation Agreements (2003), Swedish Forest Agency and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm
45. Sverdrup-Thygeson A. Key habitats in the Norwegian production forest: a case study. Scand. J. For. Res. 17 (2002) 166-178
46. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L., and Nowak M.A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371 (1994) 65-66
47. Underhill L.G. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol. Conserv. 70 (1994) 85-87
48. Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J., and Williams P.H. What to protect?-systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55 (1991) 235-254
49. Vanha-Majamaa I., and Jalonen J. Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3 (2001) 79-90
50. Virkkala R., Rajasarkka A., Vaisanen R.A., Vickholm M., and Virolainen E. The significance of protected areas for the land birds of southern Finland. Conserv. Biol. 8 (1994) 532-544