Endovascular therapy of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: Preinterventional imaging and follow-up;Endovaskuläre therapie des bauchaortenaneurysmas: Prä- und postinterventionelle bildgebende diagnostik

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 223-230

  Seifarth, Harald ^a   Kramer S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM ESSLINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; Aorta; CT angiography; MR imaging; Stents

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA ANEURYSM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STENT; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK FACTORS; SOFTWARE; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR;

EID: 42949177123     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963796     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Dubost C, Allary M, Oeconomos N. Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: reestablishment of the continuity by a preserved human arterial graft, with result after five months. AMA Arch Surg 1952; 64: 405-408
2. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991; 5: 491-499
3. Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G et al. Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 841-848
4. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2179-2186
5. Leurs LJ, Kievit J, Dagnelie PC et al. Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 640-648
6. Hobo R, Kievit J, Leurs LJ et al. Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EUROSTAR study. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 1-11
7. Chaikof EL, Fillinger MF, Matsumura JS et al. Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 1061-1066
8. Allenberg JR, Schumacher H. Endovaskuläre Rekonstruktion des infrarenalen abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas (AAA). Chirurg 1995; 66: 870-877
9. Thompson MM, Smith J, Naylor AR et al. Microembolization during endovascular and conventional aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25: 179-186
10. Gorich J, Kramer S, Tomczak R et al. Thromboembolic complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 180-184
11. Kramer SC, Seifarth H, Pamler R et al. Renal infarction following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: incidence and clinical consequences. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 98-102
12. Pitton MB. Collateral vessels in endovascular aneurysm treatment. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 514-517
13. Pitton MB, Welter B, Schmenger P et al. Einfluss von Typ-II-Endoleaks auf die Größenänderung und Hämodynamik experimenteller Aortenaneurysmen nach endovaskularer Therapie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1682-1689
14. Engelke C, Elford J, Morgan RA et al. Internal iliac artery embolization with bilateral occlusion before endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair-clinical outcome of simultaneous and sequential intervention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 667-676
15. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992; 182: 243-246
16. Broeders IA, Blankensteijn JD, Olree M et al. Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: a prospective comparative study of spiral CT angiography, arteriography, and conventional CT imaging. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4: 252-261
17. Parker MV, O'Donnell SD, Chang AS et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 199-205
18. Gross-Fengels W, Huttmann P, Heindel W et al. Einfluss der Röntgenanatomie auf die Technik der Stentimplantation in Beckenarterien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1994; 161: 161-163
19. Coenegrachts K, Rigauts H, De Letter J. Prediction of aortoiliac stent graft length: comparison of a semiautomated computed tomography angiography method and calibrated aortography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27: 284-288
20. Kritpracha B, Wolfe J, Beebe HG. CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 103-110
21. Rubin GD, Paik DS, Johnston PC et al. Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 1998; 206: 823-829
22. Tillich M, Hill BB, Paik DS et al. Prediction of aortoiliac stent-graft length: comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 2001; 220: 475-483
23. Boll DT, Lewin JS, Duerk JL et al. Assessment of automatic vessel tracking techniques in preoperative planning of transluminal aortic stent graft implantation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 278-285
24. Diehm N, Herrmann P, Dinkel HP. Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 527-534
25. Beebe HG, Kritpracha B, Serres S et al. Endograft planning without preoperative arteriography: a clinical feasibility study. J Endovasc Ther 2000; 7: 8-15
26. Wyers MC, Fillinger MF, Schermerhorn ML et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm without preoperative arteriography. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 730-738
27. Beebe HG, Kritpracha B. Computed tomography scanning for endograft planning: evolving toward three-dimensional, single source imaging. Semin Vasc Surg 2004; 17: 126-134
28. Neschis DG, Fairman RM. Magnetic resonance imaging for planning aortic endograft procedures. Semin Vasc Surg 2004; 17: 135-143
29. Lutz AM, Willmann JK, Pfammatter T et al. Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 619-627
30. Beebe HG, Kritpracha B. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm: current status. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17: 111-118
31. Harris PL, Buth J, Mialhe C et al. The need for clinical trials of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft repair: The EUROSTAR Project. EUROpean collaborators on Stent-graft Techniques for abdominal aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4: 72-77; discussion 78-79
32. Leurs LJ, Laheij RJ, Buth J. What determines and are the consequences of surveillance intensity after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 868-875
33. White GH, May J, Waugh RC et al. Type I and Type II endoleaks: a more useful classification for reporting results of endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg 1998; 5: 189-191
34. Pitton MB, Schmiedt W, Neufang A et al. Klassifikation und Therapie von Endolecks nach endovaskulärer Behandlung von abdominellen Aortenaneurysmen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 24-34
35. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P et al. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European Collaborators on Stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32: 739-749
36. Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 2007; 243: 641-655
37. Maldonado TS, Gagne PJ. Controversies in the management of type II "branch" endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2003; 37: 1-12
38. van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL et al. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 461-473
39. Gelfand DV, White GH, Wilson SE. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneuiysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2006; 20: 69-74
40. England A, Butterfield JS, Jones N et al. Device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: experience with a talent stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15: 1399-1405
41. White GH, May J, Waugh RC et al. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg 1998; 5: 305-309
42. Matsumura JS, Chaikof EL. Continued expansion of aortic necks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. EVT Investigators. EndoVascular Technologies. Inc J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 422-430; discussion 430-421
43. Wegener M, Gorich J, Kramer S et al. Thrombus formation in aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 372-379
44. Kramer SC, Seifarth H, Pamler R et al. Geometric changes in aortic endografts over a 2-year observation period. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 34-38
45. Gilling-Smith G, Brennan J, Harris P et al. Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification, and strategies for surveillance and intervention. J Endovasc Surg 1999; 6: 305-307
46. Ermis C, Kramer S, Tomczak R et al. Does successful embolization of endoleaks lead to aneurysm sac shrinkage? J Endovasc Ther 2000; 7: 441-445
47. Gorich J, Rilinger N, Kramer S et al. Angiography of leaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 811-814
48. Gorich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R et al. Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography. Radiology 1999; 213: 767-772
49. Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Carpenter JP et al. Use of CT angiography to classify endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 663-667
50. Elkouri S, Panneton JM, Andrews JC et al. Computed tomography and ultrasound in follow-up of patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18: 271-279
51. Golzarian J, Murgo S, Dussaussois L et al. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endoluminal treatment: comparison of color Doppler sonography with biphasic helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 623-628
52. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT et al. Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 329-331
53. Rozenblit A, Marin ML, Veith FJ et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1473-1479
54. Rozenblit AM, Patlas M, Rosenbaum AT et al. Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology 2003; 227: 426-433
55. Merkle EM, Klein S, Kramer SC et al. MR angiographic findings in patients with aortic endoprostheses. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 641-648
56. Cejna M, Loewe C, Schoder M et al. MR angiography vs. CT angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stent grafts in endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2443-2450
57. Kramer SC, Gorich J, Pamler R et al. Wertigkeit der MRT in der Erkennung von Leckagen nach endovaskulärer Aneurysmaausschaltung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1285-1288
58. Wicky S, Fan CM, Geller SC et al. MR angiography of endoleak with inconclusive concomitant CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 736-738
59. Pitton MB, Schweitzer H, Herber S et al. MRI versus helical CT for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1275-1281
60. Haulon S, Lions C, McFadden EP et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 22: 62-69
61. Baum RA, Stavropoulos SW, Fairman RM et al. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1111-1117
62. Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 1029-1035