Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 619-627

  Lutz, Amelie M ^a   Willmann, Jürgen K ^a   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Lachat, Mario ^a   Wildermuth, Simon ^a   Marincek, Borut ^a   Weishaupt, Dominik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STENT;

EID: 0037345954     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.143     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Brewster DC, Fan CM, Cambria RP, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:289-302.
2. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Barker CF, Golden MA, Mitchell ME, Velazquez OC, et al. Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:1050-4.
3. Chaikof EL, Fillinger MF, Matsumura JS, Rutherford RB, White GH, Blankensteijn JD, et al. Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1061-6.
4. Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Johnson MS, Patel NH, Persohn SA, Lalka SG. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment with multislice CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:607-14.
5. Thurnher SA, Dorffner R, Thurnher MM, Winkelbauer FW, Kretschmer G, Polterauer P, et al. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:341-52.
6. Blum U, Voshage G, Lammer J, Beyersdorf F, Tollner D, Kretschmer G, et al. Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1997;336:13-20.
7. Hovsepian DM, Hein AN, Pilgram TK, Cohen DT, Kim HS, Sanchez LA, et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in 144 patients: correlation of aneurysm size, proximal aortic neck length, and procedure-related complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:1373-82.
8. Prokop M. CT angiography of the abdominal arteries. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:462-8.
9. Aarts NJ, Schurink GW, Schultze Kool LJ, Bode PJ, van Baalen JM, Hermans J, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:475-80.
10. Baskin K. Quantitative tube geometry analysis of tortuous and eccentric abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology 1996;201:317.
11. Rubin GD, Paik DS, Johnston PC, Napel S. Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 1998;206:823-9.
12. Tillich M, Hill BB, Paik DS, Petz K, Napel S, Zarins CK, et al. Prediction of aortoiliac stent-graft length: comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 2001;220:475-83.
13. Ludman CN, Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Gregson RH, Walker S, Hopkinson BR. Feasibility of using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography as the sole imaging modality prior to endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:524-30.
14. Shimizu T, Misaki T, Yamamoto K, Sueyoshi K, Narabayashi I. Helical CT of the liver with computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology: scan delay of arterial phase scanning and effect of flow rates. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:219-23.
15. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-62.
16. Thurnher SA, Capelastegui A, Del Olmo FH, Dondelinger RF, Gervas C, Jassoy AG, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study. Radiology 2001;219:137-46.
17. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200:569-71.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
20. Arko FR, Lee WA, Hill BB, Olcott Ct, Dalman RL, Harris EJ Jr, et al. Aneurysm-related death: primary endpoint analysis for comparison of open and endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:297-304.
21. Cohn SM, Moller BA, Zieg PM, Milner KA, Angood PB. Angiography for preoperative evaluation in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding: are the benefits worth the risks? Arch Surg 1998;133:50-5.
22. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;138:273-81.
23. Fillinger MF. Imaging of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. Semin Vasc Surg 2000;13:247-63.
24. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, Chenevert TL, Williams DM, Marx MV, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-92.
25. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Sakaguchi T, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience. Radiology 2000;216:909-15.
26. Jacobs MJ, Eijsman L, Meylaerts SA, Balm R, Legemate DA, de Haan P, et al. Reduced renal failure following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair by selective perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:201-5.