Computed tomography scanning for endograft planning: Evolving toward three-dimensional, single source imaging

Seminars in Vascular Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 126-134

  Beebe, Hugh G ^a   Kritpracha, Boonprasit ^a  

^a JOBST VASCULAR CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM;

ANATOMY; AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 3042698977     PISSN: 08957967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2004.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beebe H.G., Jackson T., Pigott J.P. Aortic aneurysm morphology for planning endovascular grants Limitations of conventional imaging methods. J Endovasc Surg. 2:1995;139-148
2. Lutz A.M., Willmann J.K., Pfammatter T., et al. Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool. J Vasc Surg. 37:2003;619-627
3. Lawler L.P., Fishman E.K. Multidetector row computed tomography of the aorta and peripheral arteries. Cardiol Clin. 21:2003;607-629
4. Beebe H.G., Kritpracha B., Serres S., et al. Endograft planning without preoperative arteriography A clinical feasibility study. J Endovasc Ther. 7:2000;8-15
5. Wyers M.C., Fillinger M.F., Schermerhorn M.L., et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm without preoperative arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 38:2003;730-738
6. Kritpracha B., Beebe H.G., Comerota A.J. Aortic diameter is an insensitive measurement of early aneurysm expansion after endograft. J Endovasc Ther. 11:2004;76-82
7. Beebe H.G. Imaging modalities for aortic endografting. J Endovasc Surg. 4:1997;111-123
8. Kritpracha B., Wolfe J., Beebe H.G. CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck An important problem in endograft planning. J Endovas Ther. 9:2002;103-110
9. Sternbergh W.C. III, Money S.R., Greenberg R.K., et al. Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation Results from the Zenith Multicenter Trial. J Vasc Surg. 39:2004;20-26
10. Coenegrachts K., Rigauts H., DeLetter J. Prediction of aortoiliac stent graft length comparison of a semiautomated computed tomography angiography method and calibrated aortography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 27:2003;284-288
11. Greenberg R.K., Clair D., Srivastava S., et al. Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg. 38:2003;990-996
12. Isokangas J.M., Hietala R., Perala J., et al. Accuracy of computer-aided measurements in endovascular stent-graft planning An experimental study with two phantoms. Invest Radiol. 38:2003;164-170
13. Dillavou E.D., Muluk S.C., Rhee R.Y., et al. Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg. 38:2003;657-663
14. Beebe H.G., Kritpracha B. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm Current status. Ann Vasc Surg. 17:2003;111-118