Practical guidelines for assessing power and false discovery rate for a fixed sample size in microarray experiments

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1960-1972

  Tong, Tiejun ^a   Zhao, Hongyu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Gene expression data; Power; Sample size; T statistic

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION THEORY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 42949153333     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3237     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pawitan Y, Michiels S, Koscielny S, Gusnanto A, Ploner A. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3017-3024.
2. Yang MCK, Yang JJ, McIndoe RA, She JX. Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations. Physiological Genomics 2003; 16:24-28.
3. Gadbury GL, Page GP, Edwards J, Kayo T, Prolla TA, Weindruch R, Permana PA, Mountz JD, Allison DB. Power and sample size estimation in high dimensional biology. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2004; 13:325-338.
4. Jung SH. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3097-3104.
5. Dobbin K, Simon R. Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification. Biostatistics 2005; 6:27-38.
6. Li SS, Bigler J, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Feng Z. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:2267-2280.
7. Hu J, Zou F, Wright FA. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3264-3272.
8. Pounds S, Cheng C. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:4263-4271.
9. Tsai CA, Wang SJ, Chen DT, Chen JJ. Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:1502-1508.
10. Ferreira JA, Zwinderman A. Approximate sample size calculations with microarray data: an illustration. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2006; 5:Article 25.
11. Liu P, Hwang JTG. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:739-746.
12. Tibshirani R. A simple method for assessing sample sizes in microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:106.
13. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1995; 57:289-300.
14. Storey JD. The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics 2003; 31:2013-2035.
15. Fernando RL, Nettledon D, Southey BR, Dekkers JC, Rothschild MF, Soller M. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics 2004; 166:611-619.
16. Bickel DR. Error-rate and decision-theoretic methods of multiple testing: which genes have high objective probabilities of differential expression? Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004; 3:Article 8.
17. Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D. Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rate: a unified approach. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2004; 66:187-205.
18. Zhang CH, Tang W. Bayes and empirical Bayes approaches to controlling the false discovery rate. TR 2005-004, Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, 2005.
19. Langaas M, Lindqvist BH, Ferkingstad E. Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2005; 67:555-572.
20. Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rate. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2002; 64:479-498.
21. Alon U, Barkai N, Notterman DA, Gish K, Ybarra S, Mack D, Levine AJ. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999; 96:6745-6750.
22. Huang X, Pan W. Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arrays. Functional and Integrative Genomics 2002; 2:126-133.
23. Ge Y, Dudoit S, Speed TP. Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis. Test 2003; 12:1-77.
24. Hung HM, O'nell RT, Bauer P, Köhne K. The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true. Biometrics 1997; 53:11-22.
25. Sackrowitz H, Samuel-Cahn E. P values as random variables - expected P values. The American Statistician 1999; 53:326-331.