Controlling the Proportion of False Positives in Multiple Dependent Tests

Genetics

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 611-619

  Fernando, R L ^a   Nettleton, D ^a,b   Southey, B R ^c   Dekkers, J C M ^a   Rothschild, M F ^a   Soller, M ^d  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; SIMULATION;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GENOMICS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 1642381468     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.611     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALLISON, D. B., G. L. GADBURY, M. HEO, J. FERNANDEZ, C.-K. LEE et al., 2002 A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Comp. Stat. Data Anal. 39: 1-20.
2. BENJAMINI, Y., and Y. HOCHBERG, 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57: 289-300.
3. BENJAMINI, Y., and Y. HOCHBERG, 2000 On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 25: 60-83.
4. ELSTON, R. C., 1997 1996 William Allan award address: algorithms and inferences: the challenges of multifactorial diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60: 225-262.
5. ELSTON, R. C., and K. LANGE, 1975 The prior probability of autosomal linkage. Ann. Hum. Genet. 38: 341-350.
6. GENOVESE, C., and L. WASSERMAN, 2002 Operator characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64: 499-517.
7. LANDER, E., and L. KRUGLYAK, 1995 Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat. Genet. 11: 241-247.
8. MORTON, N., 1955 Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 7: 277-318.
9. MOSIG, M., E. LIPKIN, G. KHUTORESKAYA, E. TCHOURZYNA, M. SOLLER et al., 2001 A whole genome scan for QTL affecting milk protein percentage in Israel-Holstein cattle by means of selective milk pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion. Genetics 157: 1683-1698.
10. NETTLETON, D., and J. HWANG, 2003 Estimating the number of false null hypotheses when conducting many tests. Preprint Series 2003-09, Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
11. OTT, J., 1991 Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
12. RISCH, N., 1991 A note on multiple testing procedures in linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 1058-1064.
13. ROHATGI, V. K., 1976 An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.
14. SCHWEDER, T., and E. SPJOTVOLL, 1982 Plots of P-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 69: 493-502.
15. SOLLER, M., T. BRODY and A. GENIZI, 1976 On the power of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 47: 35-39.
16. SOUTHEY, B. R., and R. L. FERNANDO, 1998 Controlling the proportion of false positives among significant results in QTL detection. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia, Vol. 26, pp. 221-224.
17. STOREY, J. D., 2002 A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64: 479-498.
18. STOREY, J. D., 2003 The positive false discovery rate: Bayesian interpretation and the Q-value. Ann. Stat. 31 (6): 2013-2035.
19. STOREY, J. D., and R. TIBSHIRANI, 2001 Estimating false discovery rates under dependence, with applications to DNA microarrays. Technical Report 2001-28, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
20. WELLER, J. I., 2000 Using the false discovery rate approach in the genetic dissection of complex traits: a response to Zaykin et al. Genetics 154: 1919.