Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 3264-3272

  Hu, Jianhua ^a   Zou, Fei ^b   Wright, Fred A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; EXPERIMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC MODEL; LUNG; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 25144521453     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti519     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Black,M.A. and Doerge,R.W. (2002) Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#18#1b], 1609-1616.
2. Chen,Y. [i#et al.#1i] (1997) Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images. [i#J. Biomed. Optics#1i], [b#2#1b], 364-367.
3. Chu,G., Narasimhan,B., Tibshirani,R. and Tusher,V. (2001) [i#SAM, "Significance Analysis of Microarrays"#1i]. Users Guide and Technical Document.
4. Cohen,J. (1988) [i#Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences#1i], 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Dempster,A.P. [i#et al.#1i] (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). [i#J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B#1i], [b#39#1b], 1-38.
6. Dudoit,S. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. [i#Stat. Sinica#1i], [b#12#1b], 111-139.
7. Efron,B. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. [i#J. Am. Stat. Assoc.#1i], [b#96#1b], 1151-1160.
8. Giles,P. and Kipling,D. (2003) Normality of oligonucleotide microarray data and implications for parametric statistical analyses. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#19#1b], 2254-2262.
9. Hu,J. and Wright,F.A. (2004) Assessing differential gene expression with small sample sizes in oligonucleotide arrays using a mean-variance model. Submitted.
10. Ideker,T. [i#et al.#1i] (2000) Testing for differentially expressed genes by maximum likelihood analysis of microarray data. [i#J. Comput. Biol.#1i] [b#7#1b], 805-817.
11. Jin,W. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in [i#Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet.#1i], [b#29#1b], 389-395.
12. Johnson,N.L., Kotz,S. and Balakrishnan,N. (1994) [i#Continous Univariate Distributions#1i], 2nd edn. Wiley, NY.
13. Lee,M.T. and Whitmore,G.A. (2002) Power and sample size for DNA microarray studies. [i#Stat. Med.#1i], [b#21#1b], 3543-3570.
14. Liao,J.G. [i#et al.#1i] (2004) A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#20#1b], 2694-2701.
15. Neter,J., Wasserman,W. and Kutner,M.H. (1985) [i#Applied Linear Statistical Models#1i], 2nd edn. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
16. Pan,W. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. [i#Funct. Integr. Genomics#1i], [b#3#1b], 117-124.
17. Pan,W. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) How many replicates of arrays are required to detect gene expression changes in microarray experiments? A mixture model approach. [i#Genome Biol.#1i], [b#3#1b], research0022.1-0022.10.
18. Parmigiani,G. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) A statistical framework for expression-based molecular classification in cancer. [i#J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B#1i], [b#64#1b], 717-736.
19. Reiner,A. [i#et al.#1i] (2003) Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#19#1b], 368-375.
20. Storey,J.D. (2003) The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the Q-value. [i#Ann. Stat.#1i], [b#31#1b], 2013-2035.
21. Storey,J.D. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) [i#The Analysis of Gene Expression Data: Methods and Software#1i]. Springer, NY.
22. Troyanskaya,O.G. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#18#1b], 1454-1461.
23. Tusher,VG., Tibshirani,R. and Chu,G. (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#98#1b], 5116-5121.
24. Welch,B.L. (1947) The generalization of 'students' problem when several different population variances are involved. [i#Biometrika#1i], [b#34#1b], 28-35.
25. Yoon,H. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Gene expression profiling of isogenic cells with different tp53 gene dosage reveals numerous genes that are affected by tp53 dosage and identifies cspg2 as a direct target of p53. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#99#1b], 15632-15637.