Effect of vascular stenosis on perfusion-weighted imaging; differences between calculation algorithms

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1103-1108

  Matsushima, Shigenori ^a   Kubota, Takao ^a   Yamada, Kei ^a   Akazawa, Kentaro ^a   Masunami, Terutoshi ^a   Ito, Hirotoshi ^a   Ushijima, Yo ^a   Owada, Kei ^a   Sasajima, Hiroyasu ^a   Mineura, Katsuyoshi ^a   Nishimura, Tsunehiko ^a  

^a KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Brain; Deconvolution; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion; Single photon emission tomography

Indexed keywords

ISOPROPYL 4 IODAMPHETAMINE I 123; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CALCULATION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MALE; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID STENOSIS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 42949094595     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21362     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Osborn AG. Diagnostic neuroradiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. p 344-349.
2. Shimosegawa E, Inugami A, Okudera T, et al. Embolic cerebral infarction: MR findings in the first 3 hours after onset. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1077-1082.
3. Baird AE, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:583-609.
4. Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, et al. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 199:391-401.
5. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
6. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637-641.
7. Vonken EP, Beekman FJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:343-350.
8. Ostergaard L, Chesler DA, Weisskoff RM, Sorensen AG, Rosen BR. Modeling cerebral blood flow and flow heterogeneity from magnetic resonance residue data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:690-699.
9. Wu O, Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, et al. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
10. Ibaraki M, Shimosegawa E, Toyoshima H, Takahashi K, Miura S, Kanno I. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:378-390.
11. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
12. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use. Stroke 2002;33:1146-1151.
13. Lear JL, Ackermann RF, Kameyama M, et al. Evaluation of [1231]isopropyliodoamphetamine as a tracer for local cerebral blood flow using direct autoradiographic comparison. J Cereb Blod Flow Metab 1982;2:179-185.
14. Holman BL, Devous MD Sr. Functional brain SPECT: the emergence of a powerful clinical method. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1888-1904.
15. Karonen JO, Vanninen RL, Liu Y, et al. Combined diffusion and perfusion MRI with correlation to single-photon emission CT in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1583-1590.
16. Wirestam R, Andersson L, Ostergaard L, et al. Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:691-700.
17. Chen JJ, Frayne R, Smith MR. Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:1251-1263.
18. Ostergaard L, Johannsen P, Host-Poulsen P, et al. Cerebral blood flow measurements by magnetic resonance imaging bolus tracking: comparison with [(15)P]H2O positron emission tomography in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:935-940.
19. Mukherjee P, Kang HC, Widden TO, et al. Measurement of cerebral blood flow in chronic carotid occlusive disease: comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging with positron emission tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:862-871.
20. Chang W, Henkin RE, Buddemeyer E. The source of overestimation in the quantification by SPECT of uptakes in a myocardial phantom: concise communication. J Nucl Med 1984;25:788-791.
21. Albers GW. Expanding the window for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke. The potential role of acute MRI for patient selection. Stroke 1999;30:2230-2237.
22. Sunshine JL, Tarr RW, Lanzieri CF, et al. Hyperacute stroke: ultrafast MR imaging to triage patients prior to therapy. Radiology 1999;212:325-332.
23. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable II (STAIR-II). Recommendations for clinical trial evaluation of acute stroke therapies. Stroke 2001;32:1598-1606.
24. Warach S. Thrombolysis in stroke beyond three hours: targeting patients with diffusion and perfusion MRI. Ann Neurol 2002;51: 11-13.
25. Rivers CS, Wardlaw JM, Armitage PA, et al. Do acute diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI lesions identify final infarct volume in ischemic stroke? Stroke 2006;37:98-104.
26. Yamada K, Wu O, Gonzalez RG, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging of acute cerebral infarction: effect of the calculation methods and underlying vasculopathy. Stroke 2002; 33:87-94.
27. Wu O, Østergaard L, Koroshetz WJ, et al. Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:856-864.
28. Weisskoff RM, Chesler D, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Pitfalls in MR measurement of tissue blood flow with intravascular tracers: which mean transit time? Magn Reson Med 1993;29:553-559.