On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization

Studies in Language

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 336-382

  Fischer, Olga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549166635     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.32.2.04fis     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Aitchison, Jean. 1987. The language lifegame: Prediction, explanation and linguistic change. Explanation and linguistic change, Willem Koopman, Frederike van der Leek, Olga Fischer & Roger Eaton (eds.), 11-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Aitchison, Jean. 1994. 'Say, say it again Sam': The treatment of repetition in linguistics. Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 7: 15-34.
3. Anderson, John M. & Charles Jones. 1974. Historical linguistics. 2 Vols. Amsterdam: North Holland.
4. Anttila, Raimo. 2003. Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. The handbook of historical linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 425-440. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Arbib, Michael A. 2003. The evolving mirror system: A neural basis for language readiness. Christiansen & Kirby (eds.), 182-200.
6. Baayen, R. Harald. 2003. Probabilistic approaches to morphology. Probabilistic linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), 229-287. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
7. Bock, H. 1931. Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem TO-Infinitiv. Anglia 55: 114-249.
8. Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Brinton, Laurel J. 2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: On the 'late' use of temporal adverbs. English historical syntax and morphology: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Teresa Fanego, María Jos ́López-Couso & Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds.), 68-97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Brinton, Laurel J. & Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: CUP.
11. Bybee, Joan L. & Dan I. Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58: 265-289.
12. Bybee, Joan L, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Campbell, Lyle (ed.) 2001a. Grammaticalization. A critical assessment. Language Sciences 23(2-3), special issue.
14. Campbell, Lyle. 2001b. What is wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113-161.
15. Campbell, Lyle & Richard Janda. 2001. Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23: 93-112.
16. Chapman, Don & Royal Skousen, R. (2005). Analogical modeling and morphological change: The case of the adjectival negative prefix in English. English Language and Linguistics 9: 333-57.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht. Foris.
18. Christiansen, Morten H. & Simon Kirby (eds.). 2003. Language evolution. Oxford: OUP.
19. Clark, Eve V. 2003. First language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
20. Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. The cognitive organization of information. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Crystal, David. 1997. A dictionary of phonetics and linguistics, 4th edn. London: Longmans.
22. Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The symbolic species. The co-evolution of laguage and the brain. New York NY: Norton.
23. Deacon, Terrence W. 2003. Universal grammar and semiotic constraints. Christiansen & Kirby (eds.), 111-139.
24. Denison, David. 1990. Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 139-166.
25. Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax. London: Longman.
26. Deutscher, Guy. 2001. The rise and fall of a rogue relative construction. Studies in Language 25: 405-422.
27. DICTIONARY OF OLD ENGLISH CORPUS (http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/o/oec)
28. Diewald, Gabriele, 1997. Grammatikalisierung, Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
29. Edhard, Anne. 2004. Semantic modality map for Sranan Tongo. MA thesis, English Department, Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam.
30. Fischer, Andreas. 1994. 'Summer is icumen in': The seasons of the year in Middle English and Early Modern English. Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 79-95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Fischer, Andreas. 1997. 'With this ring I thee wed': The verbs to wed and to marry in the history of English. Hickey & Puppel (eds.), 467-481.
32. Fischer, Olga. 1989. The origin and spread of the accusative and infinitive construction in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 143-217.
33. Fischer, Olga. 1997. The grammaticalisation of infinitival to in English compared with German and Dutch. Hickey & Puppel (eds.), 265-280.
34. Fischer, Olga. 2004a. Evidence for iconicity in language. Logos and Language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory 5(i): 1-19.
35. Fischer, Olga. 2004b. What counts as evidence in historical linguistics? Studies in Language 28: 710-740. (Reprinted in What counts as evidence in linguistics, Martina Penke & Anette Rosenbach (eds 2007), 249-282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change. Functional and formal perspectives Oxford: OUP.
37. Fischer, Olga & Frederike van der Leek. 1983. The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19: 337-368.
38. Fischer, Olga, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.). 2004a. Up and down the cline - The nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Fischer, Olga, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon. 2004b. Introduction, In search of grammaticalization. Fischer et al. (eds.), 1-16.
40. Fischer, Olga, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.). 2000. Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Gentner, Deirdre, Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds.). 2001. The analogical mind. Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
42. Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York NY Academic Press.
43. Goldberg, Elkhonon. 2001. The executive brain. Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. Oxford: OUP.
44. Haiman, John & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). 1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP.
46. Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive - A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 287-310.
47. Haspelmath, Martin. 1992. Review of Traugott and Heine. 1991. Lingua 88: 340-345.
48. Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. Fischer et al. (eds.), 17-44.
49. Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: OUP.
50. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. From cognition to grammar. Evidence from African languages. Traugott & Heine (eds.), Vol.I, 149-187.
51. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
52. Hickey, Raymond & Stanislaw Puppel (eds.). 1997. Language history and linguistic modelling. A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. 2 Vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
53. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), 21-42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
54. Hofstadter, Douglas. 1995. Fluid concepts and creative analogies. Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. New York NY: Basic Books.
55. Holyoak, Keith J. & Paul Thagard. 1995. Mental leaps. Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
56. Hopper, Paul J.. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. Traugott & Heine (eds.), Vol.I, 17-35.
57. Hopper, Paul. J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
58. ICE-GB: The international corpus of English, the British component. Survey of English usage, University College London, 1998.
59. Itkonen, Esa. 1994. Iconicity, analogy and universal grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 37-53.
60. Itkonen, Esa. 2005. Analogy as structure and process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Itkonen, Esa & Jussi Haukioja. 1997. A rehabilitation of analogy in syntax (and elsewhere). Metalinguistik im Wandel. Die 'kognitive Wende' in Wissenschaftstheorie und Linguistik, András Kertész (ed.), 131-177. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
62. Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond 'pathways' and 'unidirectionality: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265-340.
63. Joseph, Brian D. 2001. Is there such a thing as 'grammaticalization'? Language Sciences 23: 163-186.
64. Joseph, Brian D. 2003. Some thoughts on optimality, optimization, and analogy: Back to basics (and beyond). Lecture given at the Meertens Instituut, Amsterdam, May 26, 2003.
65. Joseph, Brian D. 2004. Rescuing traditional historical linguistics from grammaticalization theory. Fischer et al. (eds.), 45-71.
66. Keller, Rudi. 1998. A theory of linguistic signs. Oxford. OUP.
67. Kemenade, Ans van. 1992. Structural factors in the history of English modals. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, Matti Rissanen (ed.), 287-309. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
68. Kiparsky, Paul. 1974. Remarks on analogical change. Anderson & Jones (eds.), Vol. II, 257-275.
69. Kiparsky, Paul. Forthcoming. Grammaticalization as optimization. Available online on http://www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/ alegrammaticalization.pdf
70. Knight, Chris, Michael Studdert-Kennedy & James R. Hurford (eds.). 2000. The evolutionary emergence of language. Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge: CUP
71. Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation. An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
72. Lambrecht, Knud. 1988, Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. Haiman & Thompson (eds.), 135-179.
73. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
74. Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71: 1-62.
75. Lass, Roger. 2000. Remarks on (uni)directionality. Fischer et al. (eds.), 207-227.
76. Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projektes. University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Reprinted in 1995, Munich: Lincom.
77. Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303-318.
78. Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage, Haiman & Thompson (eds.), 181-225.
79. Lehmann, Christian. 1989. Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 11-19.
80. Lewis, C.S. 1960. Studies in words. Cambridge: CUP.
81. Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: CUP
82. Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden MA: Blackwell.
83. Los, Bettelou. 2005. The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford: OUP.
84. Menn, Lise & Brian MacWhinney. 1984. The repeated morph constraint: Toward an explanation. Language 60:519-541.
85. Mitchell, Bruce. 1964. Syntax and word order in The Peterborough Chronicle 1122-1134. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 65: 113-144.
86. Newmeyer, Frederic J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
87. Peters, Ann M. 1985. Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. Slobin (ed.), 1029-1067.
88. Pickering, Martin J. & Holly P. Branigan. 1999. Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 136-141.
89. Plank, Frans. 1985. Prädikativ und Koprädikativ. Zeitschrift für germanische Linguistik 13: 154-185.
90. Plank, Frans. 1995. Entgrammatisierung - Spiegelbild der Grammatisierung?. Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel, Norbert Boretzky, Wolfgang Dressler, J. Orešnik, K. Teržan & Wolfgang U. Wurzel (eds.), 199-219. Bochum: Brochmeyer.
91. Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2002. The neuroscience of language. On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: CUP.
92. Ramat, Paolo. 1992. Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics 30:549-560.
93. Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
94. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
95. Shelley, Cameron. 2003. Multiple analogies in science and philosophy, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
96. Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
97. Skousen, Royal. 1992. Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
98. Slobin, Dan I. 1985a. Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. Dan I. Slobin (ed.), 1158-1256.
99. Slobin, Dan I. (ed.) 1985b. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2. Theoretical issues. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100. Slobin, Dan I. 1997 [2001]. The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 5. Expanding the Contexts, Dan I. Slobin (ed.), 265-323. Mahwah NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted in shortened form in Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.) 2001. Language acquisition and conceptual development. CUP, 406-449.)
101. Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects ofsemantic structure. Cambridge: CUP.
102. Tabor, Whitney & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. The limits of grammaticalization, Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), 229-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
103. Tannen, Deborah. 1985. Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. Literacy, language, and learning. The nature and consequences of reading and writing, David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance & Angela Hildyard (eds.), 124-147. Cambridge: CUP.
104. Tomasello, Michael. 2003a. On the different origins of symbols and grammar. Christiansen & Kirby (eds.), 94-110.
105. Tomasello, Michael. 2003b. Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
106. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. Perspectives on historical linguistics, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
107. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31-55.
108. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), 31-54. Cambridge: CUP.
109. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
110. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Bernd Heine (eds.) 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues; II: Focus on types of grammatical markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
111. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. Traugott & Heine (eds.), I, 189-218.
112. Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. Anderson & Jones (eds.), 1, 339-376.
113. Vihman, Marilyn M. & Rory A. DePaolis. 2000. Role of mimesis in infant language development: Evidence for phylogeny? Knight et al. (eds.), 130-145.
114. Vincent, Nigel. 1995. Exaptation and grammaticalization. Historical linguistics 1993, Henning Andersen (ed.), 433-445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
115. Wanner, Dieter. 2006. The power of analogy. An essay on historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
116. Warner, Anthony R. 1990. Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6-9 April 1987, Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds.), 537-558. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
117. Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: CUP.
118. Winford, Donald. 2000. Irrealis in Sranan: Mood and modality in a radical Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 15: 63-125.
119. Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization. ' Methinks' there is some confusion. In Fischer et al. (eds.), 355-370.
120. Wray, Alison. 1999. Formulaic language in learners and native speakers. Language Teaching 32: 213-231.
121. Wray, Alison. 2000. Holistic utterances in protolanguage: The link from primates to humans. Knight et al. (eds.), 285-302.
122. Wray, Alison & Michael R. Perkins. 2000. The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication 20: 1-28.
123. YCOE: The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YcoeHome1.htm)