Consumer resource matching in urbanizing landscapes: Are synanthropic species over-matching?

Ecology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 515-521

  Rodewald, Amanda D ^a   Shustack, Daniel P ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardinalis cardinalis; Condition; Consumer resource matching; Ideal free distribution; Northern Cardinal; Predation; Reproductive productivity; Survival; Urban habitats

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BODY CONDITION; CONSUMER-RESOURCE INTERACTION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; FITNESS; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; PASSERINE; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; RIPARIAN FOREST; SURVIVAL; URBANIZATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEMALE; MALE; NESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SONGBIRD; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL; URBANIZATION;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; MALE; NESTING BEHAVIOR; PASSERIFORMES; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL; URBANIZATION;

AVES; CARDINALIS; CARDINALIS CARDINALIS;

EID: 42249088914     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-0358.1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abrahams, M. V. 1989. Foraging guppies and the ideal free distribution: the influence of information on patch choice. Ethology 82:116-126.
2. Atchison, K. A., and A. D. Rodewald. 2006. The value of urban forests to wintering birds. Natural Areas Journal 26:280-288.
3. Beissinger, S. R., and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75-83.
4. Blair, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506-519.
5. Borgmann, K. L., and A. D. Rodewald. 2004. Nest predation in urbanizing landscapes: the role of exotic shrubs. Ecological Applications 14:1757-1765.
6. Borgmann, K. L., and A. D. Rodewald. 2005. Forest restoration in urbanizing landscapes: interactions between land uses and an exotic shrub. Restoration Ecology 13:334-340.
7. Bowers, M. A., and B. Breland. 1996. Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban-rural gradient: use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecological Applications 6:1135-1142.
8. Croy, M. I., and R. N. Hughes. 1991. Effects of food supply, hunger, danger, and competition on choice of foraging location by the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Animal Behaviour 42:131-139.
9. Diaz, M., J. C. Illera, and J. C. Atienza. 1998. Food resource matching by foraging tits Parus spp. during spring-summer in a Mediterranean mixed forest; evidence for an ideal free distribution. Ibis 140:654-660.
10. Faeth, S. H., P. S. Warren, E. Shochat, and W. A. Marussich. 2005. Trophic dynamics in urban communities. BioScience 55:399-407.
11. Fretwell, D., and H. L. Lucas, Jr. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16-36.
12. Gering, J. C., and R. B. Blair. 1999. Predation on artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: Predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? Ecography 22:532-541.
13. Gosler, A. G., J. J. D. Greenwood, and C. Perrins. 1995. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377:621-623.
14. Gotceitas, V., and P. Colgan. 1991. Assessment of patch profitability and ideal free distribution - the significance of sampling. Behaviour 119:65-76.
15. Halkin, S. L., and S. U. Linville. 1999. Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). Pages 1-32 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, no. 440. The Birds of North America, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
16. Harper, D. G. C. 1982. Competitive foraging in Mallards: "ideal free" ducks. Animal Behaviour 30:575-584.
17. Hennings, L. A., and W. D. Edge. 2003. Riparian bird community structure in Portland, Oregon: habitat, urbanization, and spatial scale patterns. Condor 105:288-302.
18. Hixon, M. A. 1980. Food-production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. American Naturalist 115:510-530.
19. Houston, A. I., J. M. McNamara, and J. M. C. Hutchinson. 1993. General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 341:375-397.
20. Jokimaki, J., and E. Huhta. 2000. Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. Condor 102: 838-847.
21. Jokimaki, J., M. L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimaki, A. Sorace, E. Fernandez-Juricic, I. Rodriguez-Prieto, and M. D. Jimenez. 2005. Evaluation of the "safe nesting zone" hypothesis across an urban gradient: a multi-scale study. Ecography 28:59-70.
22. Kennedy, M., and R. D. Gray. 1993. Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos 68:158-166.
23. Korona, R. 1990. Travel costs and ideal free distribution of ovipositing female flour beetles, Tribolium confusum. Animal Behaviour 40:186-187.
24. Kosinski, Z. 2001. Effects of urbanization on nest site selection and nesting success of the Greenfinch Carduelis chloris in Krotoszyn, Poland. Ornis Fennica 78:175-183.
25. Kristan, W. B., W. I. Boarman, and J. J. Crayon. 2004. Diet composition of common ravens across the urban-wildland interface of the West Mojave Desert. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:244-253.
26. Leston, L. F. V. 2005. Are urban riparian forests ecological traps for understory birds? Habitat selection by Northern Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) in urbanizing landscapes. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
27. Leston, L. F. V., and A. D. Rodewald. 2006. Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using Northern Cardinals. Biological Conservation 131:566-574.
28. Marzluff, J. M., R. Bowman, and R. E. Donnelly. 2001. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.
29. Milinski, M. 1984. Competitive resource sharing: an experimental test of a learning rule for ESSs. Animal Behaviour 32:233-242.
30. Milinski, M. 1988. Games fish play: making decisions as a social forager. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3:325-330.
31. Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning, and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in Southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416-428.
32. Morris, D. W. 1994. Habitat matching: alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evolutionary Ecology 8:387-406.
33. Parker, G. E. 1978. Searching for mates. Pages 214-244 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, editors. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Post, P., and F. Gotmark. 2006. Seasonal changes in Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus predation: prey vulnerability in relation to visibility in hunting habitats and prey behaviour. Ardea 94:77-86.
35. Pulliam, R. H., and T. Caraco. 1984. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? Pages 122-147 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, editors. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
36. Recer, G. M., W. U. Blanckenhorn, J. A. Newman, E. M. Tuttle, M. L. Withiam, and T. Caraco. 1987. Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule. Evolutionary Ecology 1:363-378.
37. Rodewald, A. D. In press. Evaluating potential factors that guide avian community response to urbanization. Studies in Avian Biology.
38. Rodewald, A. D., and M. H. Bakermans. 2006. What is the appropriate paradigm for riparian forest conservation? Biological Conservation 128:193-200.
39. Roth, T. C., and S. L. Lima. 2003. Hunting behavior and diet of Cooper's Hawks: an urban view of the small-bird-in-winter paradigm. Condor 105:474-483.
40. Shochat, E. 2004. Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622-626.
41. Shochat, E., Z. Abramsky, B. Pinshow, and M. Whitehouse. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection in migratory passerines during stopover: What causes the deviation from IFD? Evolutionary Ecology 16:469-488.
42. Shochat, E., S. B. Lerman, M. Katti, and D. B. Lewis. 2004. Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches. American Naturalist 164:232-243.
43. Shochat, E., P. S. Warren, S. H. Faeth, N. E. McIntyre, and D. Hope. 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:186-191.
44. Smith, T. M., and H. H. Shugart. 1987. Territory size variation in the Ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. Ecology 68:695-704.
45. Sorace, A. 2002. High density of bird and pest species in urban habitats and the role of predator abundance. Ornis Fennica 79:60-71.
46. Telleria, J. L., and J. Perez-Tris. 2003. Seasonal distribution of a migratory bird: effects of local and regional resource tracking. Journal of Biogeography 30:1583-1591.
47. Thorington, K. K., and R. Bowman. 2003. Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats. Ecography 26:188-196.
48. Tomialojc, L. 1982. Synurbanization of birds and prey-predators relations. Pages 131-137 in M. Luniak and B. Pisarski, editors. Animals in urban environments. Ossolineum, Wroclaw, Poland.
49. White, G. C., and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120-138.
50. Whitehead, H., and P. L. Hope. 1991. Sperm whalers off the Galapagos Islands and in the western North Pacific, 1830-1850. Ideal free whalers. Ethology and Sociobiology 12:147-161.
51. Witter, M. S., and I. C. Cuthill. 1993. The ecological costs of avian fat storage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 340:73-92.