Riparian bird community structure in Portland, Oregon: Habitat, urbanization, and spatial scale patterns

Condor

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 288-302

  Hennings, Lori A ^a,b   Edge, W Daniel ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Metro Oregon   (United States)

Author keywords

Edge effects; Neotropical migrant; Non native species; Riparian; Spatial scale; Urban

Indexed keywords

AVES; MOLOTHRUS; RIPARIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0037695154     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2003)105[0288:RBCSIP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. BASCHAK, L. A., AND R. D. BROWN. 1995. An ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning 33:211-225.
2. BLAIR, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506-519.
3. CASE, T. J. 1996. Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biological Conservation 78:69-96.
4. CLERGEAU, P., J. JOKIMÄKI, AND J.-P. L. SAVARD. 2001. Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1122-1134.
5. CLERGEAU, P., J.-P. L. SAVARD, G. MENNECHEZ, AND G. FALARDEAU. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413-425.
6. COKER, D. R., AND D. E. CAPEN. 1995. Landscape-level habitat use by Brown-headed Cowbirds in Vermont. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:631-637.
7. CROONQUIST, M. J., AND R. P. BROOKS. 1991. Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas. Environmental Management 15:701-714.
8. CROONQUIST, M. J., AND R. P. BROOKS. 1993. Effects of habitat disturbance on bird communities in riparian corridors. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48:65-70.
9. EHRLICH, P. R., D. S. DOBKIN, AND D. WHEYE. 1988. The birder's handbook. Simon and Schuster, New York.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. 1998. ArcView Geographic Information Systems version 3.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA.
11. FAUTH, P. T., E. J. GUSTAFSON, AND K. N. RABENOLD. 2000. Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S. Landscape Ecology 15:621-631.
12. FERGUSON, H. L., K. ROBINETTE, AND K. STENBERG. 2001. Wildlife of urban habitats, p. 317-341. In D. Johnson and T. O'Neil [EDS.], Wildlife habitats and relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
13. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC, E. 2000. Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology 14:513-521.
14. FISCHL, J., AND D. F. CACCAMISE. 1986. Relationships of diet and roosting behavior in the European Starling. American Midland Naturalist 117:395-404.
15. FOREST ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT TEAM. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic and social assessment. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, report number 1993-793-071. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
16. FREEMARK, K. E., AND H. G. MERRIAM. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 36:115-141.
17. FRIESEN, L. E., P. F. J. EAGLES, AND R. J. MACKAY. 1995. Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling Neotropical migrant songbirds. Conservation Biology 9:1408-1414.
18. GATES, J. E., AND N. R. GIFFEN. 1991. Neotropical migrant birds and edge effects at a forest-stream ecotone. Wilson Bulletin 103:204-217.
19. GERMAINE, S. S., S. S. ROSENSTOCK, R. E. SCHWEINSBURG, AND R. W. SCOTT. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson. Ecological Applications 8:680-691.
20. GOLDSTEIN, E. L., M. GROSS, AND R. M. DEGRAAF. 1986. Breeding birds and vegetation: a quantitative assessment. Urban Ecology 9:377-385.
21. GOTFRYD, A., AND R. I. C. HANSELL. 1986. Prediction of bird-community metrics in urban woodlots, p. 321-326. In J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph [EDS.], Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
22. GUTHRIE, D. A. 1974. Suburban bird populations in southern California. American Midland Naturalist 92:461-466.
23. HAHN, D. C., AND J. S. HATFIELD. 1995. Parasitism at the landscape scale: cowbirds prefer forests. Conservation Biology 9:1415-1424.
24. HANSEN, A. J., S. L. GARMAN, B. MARKS, AND D. L. URBAN. 1993. An approach for managing vertebrate species across multiple-use landscapes. Ecological Applications 3:481-496.
25. HENNINGS, L. A. 2001. Riparian bird communities in Portland, Oregon: habitat, urbanization, and spatial scale patterns. M.Sc. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
26. HILDEN, O. 1965. Habitat selection in birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici 2:53-75.
27. HÕRAK, P. 1993. Low fledging success of urban Great Tits. Ornis Fennica 70:168-172.
28. HOSTETLER, M., AND C. S. HOLLING. 2000. Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 4:25-42.
29. JOKIMÄKI, J. 2000. Occurrence of urban bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad scale variables. Urban Ecosystems 3:21-34.
30. JOKIMÄKI, J., AND E. HUHTA. 2000. Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. Condor 102:838-847.
31. JOKIMÄKI, J., AND J. SUHONEN. 1998. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 39:253-263.
32. LARISON, B., S. A. LAYMON, P. L. WILLIAMS, AND T. B. SMITH. 1998. Song Sparrows vs. cowbird brood parasites: impacts of forest structure and nest-site selection. Condor 100:93-101.
33. LEV, E., AND L. SHARP. 1991. The Portland-Vancouver natural areas inventory: field surveys and preliminary wildlife data, p. 236-241. In L. W. Adams and D. L. Leedy [EDS.], Wildlife conservation in metropolitan environments. National Institute for Urban Wildlife Symposium Series 2. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, MD.
34. LOY, W. G., S. ALLAN, A. R. BUCKLEY, AND J. E. MEACHAM. 2001. Atlas of Oregon. 2nd ed. University of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR.
35. MAGURRAN, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. MANCKE, R. G., AND R. A. GAVIN. 2000. Breeding bird density in woodlots: effects of depth and buildings at the edge. Ecological Applications 10:598-611.
37. MARTIN, T. E., AND D. M. FINCH. 1995. Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds, a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York.
38. MARZLUFF, J. M.; F. R. GEHLBACH, AND D. A. MANUWAL. 1998. Urban environments: influences on avifauna and challenges for the avian conservationist, p. 283-299. In J. M. Marzluff and R. Sallabanks [EDS.], Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. MAY, C. M., AND R. R. HORNER. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-riparian ecosystems, p. 281-286. In P. J. Wigington and R. L. Beschta [EDS.], Proceedings of the international conference on riparian ecology and management in multi-land use watersheds. American Water Resources Association, Portland, OR.
40. MAY, C., R. R. HORNER, J. R. KARR, B. W. MAR, AND E. B. WELCH. 1997. Effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound Lowland ecoregion. Watershed Protection Techniques 2:483-494.
41. MCCUNE, B., AND M. J. MEFFORD. 1999. PC-ORD for Windows: multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.20. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.
42. MCDONNELL, M. J., AND S. T. A. PICKETT. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232-1237.
43. MCINTYRE, N. E., K. KNOWLES-YANEZ, AND D. HOPE. 2001. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of "urban" between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems 4:5-24.
44. METRO REGIONAL SERVICES. 2002. Metro's technical report for Goal 5. Metro Regional Services, Portland, OR.
45. METRO REGIONAL SERVICES [ONLINE]. 2003. Regional land information system metadata viewer. 〈http://mazama.metro-region.org/metadata〉 (21 January 2003).
46. MILLS, G. S., J. B. DUNNING JR., AND J. M. BATES. 1991. The relationship between breeding bird density and vegetation volume. Wilson Bulletin 103: 468-479.
47. NILON, C. H., C. N. LONG, AND W. C. ZIPPERER. 1995. Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Landscape and Urban Planning 32:81-92.
48. PALMER, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.
49. PARLANGE, M. 1998. The city as ecosystem. BioScience 48:581-585.
50. PAVLIK, J., AND S. PAVLIK. 2000. Some relationships between human impact, vegetation, and birds in urban environment. Ekologia-Bratislava 19:392-408.
51. PEARSON, S. M. 1993. The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecology 8:3-18.
52. PICKETT, S. T. A., M. L. CADENASSO, J. M. GROVE, C. H. NILON, R. V. POUYAT, W. C. ZIPPERER, AND R. COSTANZA. 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecology, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333-365.
53. PORACSKY, J. 1991. The Portland-Vancouver natural areas inventory: photo interpretation and mapping, p. 231-235. In L. W. Adams and D. L. Leedy [EDS.], Wildlife conservation in metropolitan environments. National Institute for Urban Wildlife Symposium Series 2. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, MD.
54. PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATION. 1995. Portland's urban forestry management plan. Ordinance No. 168979, adopted by City Council effective July 28, 1995. Portland Parks and Recreation, Portland, OR.
55. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY. 2000. Final population estimates for Oregon, its counties, and incorporated cities: July 1, 1999. Center for Population Research and Census, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
56. RALPH, C. J., G. R. GEUPEL, P. PYLE, T. E. MARTIN, AND D. F. DESANTE [EDS.]. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144.
57. ROBINSON, S. K., F. R. THOMPSON III, T. M. DONOVAN, D. R. WHITEHEAD, AND J. FAABORG. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987-1990.
58. ROSENBERG, K. V., S. B. TERRILL, AND G. H. ROSENBERG. 1987. Value of suburban habitats to desert riparian birds. Wilson Bulletin 99:642-654.
59. ROTTENBORN, S. C. 1999. Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biological Conservation 88:289-299.
60. SAAB, V. 1999. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecological Applications 9:135-151.
61. SOLONEN, T. 2001. Breeding of the Great Tit and Blue Tit in urban and rural habitats in southern Finland. Ornis Fennica 78:49-60.
62. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179.
63. THEOBALD, D. M., J. R. MILLER, AND N. T. HOBBS. 1997. Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landscape and Urban Planning 39:25-36.
64. TORGERSON, T. 2000. The Oregon blue book. Oregon Office of the Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, Salem, OR.
65. USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE. 2000. 1997 natural resources inventory: highlights. Revised December 2000. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
66. VAN HORNE, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893-901.
67. WIENS, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385-397.