Eliciting person descriptions from eyewitnesses: A survey of police perceptions of eyewitness performance and reported use of interview techniques

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 529-560

  Brown, Charity ^a   Lloyd Jones, Toby J ^b   Robinson, Mark ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Kent Police College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COGNITION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEMORY; MENTAL STRESS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WITNESS;

EID: 41849138624     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440701728474     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1997). Imagery effects in spoken and written recall. In D. Payne & F. Conrad (Eds.), Intersections in basic and applied memory research (pp. 279-289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F, Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 115-129.
3. Brigham, J. C., & WolfsKeil, M. P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349.
4. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in a multiple face presentation paradigm: Effects of description instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 873-885.
5. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2003). Verbal overshadowing of multiple face and car recognition: Effects of within- versus across-category verbal descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 183-201.
6. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2005). Verbal facilitation of face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1442-1456.
7. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2006). Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces. Memory and Cognition, 34, 277-286.
8. Central Planning and Training Unit. (1992). Investigative interviewing: A guide to interviewing. London: Home Office, Central Planning and Training Unit.
9. Chin, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). Why do words hurt? Content, process, and criterion shift accounts of verbal overshadowing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 396-413.
10. Christianson, S. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
11. Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizing facial memory: Criterion effects in verbal overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 739-755.
12. Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 231-248.
13. Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time- critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 75-93.
14. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706.
15. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair facial recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
16. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). The verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
17. Finger, K. (2002). Mazes and music: Using perceptual processing to release verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 887-896.
18. Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The effect of verbal description on face identification accuracy: "Release from verbal overshadowing". Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 340-348.
19. Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 732-764
20. Fisher, R. P., Brennan H. K., & McCauley, M. R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In M. Eisen, G. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 265-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
22. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 722-727.
23. Fisher, R. P., Quigley, K. L., Brock, P., Chin, D., & Cutler, B. L. (1990). The effectiveness of the cognitive interview in description and identification tasks. Cited in D. Ross, J. Read., & M. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness memory: Current trends and developments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., & Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-80.
25. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26. Gwyer, P., & Clifford, B. R. (1997). The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 121-145.
27. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. The American Psychologist, 56, 405-416.
28. Kebbell, M. R. (2000). The law concerning the conduct of lineups in England and Wales: How well does it satisfy the recommendations of the American Psychology-Law Society? Law and Human Behavior, 24, 309-315.
29. Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323-330.
30. Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 101-115.
31. Kebbell, M. R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). Face value? Evaluating the accuracy of eyewitness information (Police Research Paper No. 102). London: Home Office (UK) Policing and Reducing Crime Unit.
32. Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 3-27.
33. Lindsay, R. C. L., Martin, R., & Webber, L. (1994). Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy. Law and Human Behaviour, 18, 527-541.
34. Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Brown, C. (2008). Verbal overshadowing of multiple face recognition: Effects on remembering and knowing over time. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 456-477.
35. Lovett, S. B., Small, M. Y., & Engstrom, S. A. (1992, November). The verbal overshadowing effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis, MO.
36. MacLin, M. K. (2002). The effects of exemplar and prototype descriptors on verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 929-936.
37. MacLin, O. H., Tapscott, R. L., & Malpass, R. S. (2002). The development of a computer system to collect descriptions of culprits. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 937-945.
38. Meissner, C. A. (2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.
39. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
40. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 176-186.
41. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Person descriptions as eyewitness evidence. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (1996). The misremembrance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 231-245.
43. Memon, A., & Bartlett, J. (2002). The effects of verbalization on face recognition in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 635-650.
44. Memon, A., & Higham, P. (1999). A review of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 177-196.
45. Memon, A., Holley, A., Milne, R., Köhnken, G., & Bull, R. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 641-659.
46. Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 179-197.
47. Milne, R., Clare, I. C. H., & Bull, R. (1999). Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 81-99.
48. Myklebust, T., & Alison, L. (2000). The current state of police interviews with children in Norway: How discrepant are they from models based on current issues in memory and communication? Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 331-351.
49. Newlands, P. J., George, R. C., Towell, N. A., Kemp, R. I., & Clifford, B. R. (1999). An investigation of description quality from real-life interviews. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 145-166.
50. Perfect, T. J., Hunt, L. J., & Harris, C. M. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 973-980.
51. Potter, R., & Brewer, N. (1999). Perceptions of witness behaviour-accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and mock-jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6, 97-103.
52. Pozzulo, J. D., & Warren, K. L. (2003). Descriptions and identifications of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 315-323.
53. Read, J. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1994). Verbalization decrements in long-term person identification. Paper presented at the third Practical Aspects of Memory conference, College Park, MD.
54. Roberts, K. (1996). How research on source monitoring can inform cognitive interview techniques. Psycoloquy, 7(44).
55. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
56. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
57. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
58. Schooler, J. W., Fiore, S. M., & Brandimonte, M. A. (1997). At loss from words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 291-340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Shaw, J. S., Garcia, L. A., & McClure, K. A. (1999). A lay perspective on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 52-71.
60. Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 144-160). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260-271.
62. Van Koppen, P. J., & Lochun, S. K. (1997). Portraying perpetrators: The validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behaviour, 21, 661-685.
63. Wagstaff, G. F., MacVeigh, J., Boston, R., Scott, L., Brunas-Wagstaff, J., & Cole, J. (2003). Can laboratory findings on eyewitness testimony be generalized to the real world? An archival analysis of the influence of violence, weapon presence and age on eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Psychology, 137, 17-28.
64. Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.
65. Wolgalter, M. S. (1991). Effects of post-exposure description and imaging on subsequent face recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35, 575-579.
66. Wolgalter, M. S. (1996). Describing faces from memory: Accuracy and effects on subsequent recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 536-540.
67. Wright, A. M., & Alison, L. (2004). Questioning sequences in Canadian police interviews: Constructing and confirming the course of events. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 137-154.
68. Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2005). Police perceptions of older eyewitnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 211-233.
69. Yu, C. J., & Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Effects of constructing identi-kit composites on photospread identification performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 280-292.