The law concerning the conduct of lineups in England and Wales: How well does it satisfy the recommendations of the American Psychology-Law Society?

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 309-315

  Kebbell, Mark R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIME; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; HUMAN; LAW; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT;

CRIMINAL LAW; ENGLAND; HUMANS; POLICE; PUBLIC POLICY; UNITED STATES; WALES;

EID: 0034074815     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005584020853     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Home Office (1997). Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (s.60(1)(a) and s.66). Codes of Practice Revised Edition. London: HMSO.
2. R. v. Finley, C. L. R. 50 (England and Wales, 1993).
3. R. v. Gall, Cr. App. R. P. 64 (England and Wales, 1990).
4. R. v. Quinn, C. L. R. 56 (England and Wales, 1995).
5. Slater, A. (1994). Identification: A scientific evaluation. London: Police Research Group.
6. Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.
7. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S. J., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for line-ups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.
8. Wright, D. B., & McDaid, A. T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.