Can laboratory findings on eyewitness testimony be generalized to the real world? an archival analysis of the influence of violence, weapon presence, and age on eyewitness accuracy

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 17-28

  Wagstaff, Graham F ^a   MaCveigh, Jo ^a   Boston, Richard ^a   Scott, Lisa ^a   Brunas Wagstaff, Jo ^a   Cole, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Age; Eyewitness testimony; Eyewitnesses; Memory accuracy; Weapon focus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECALL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VIOLENCE; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; CRIME; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VIOLENCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038201496     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: 19401019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980309600596     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in facial recog-nition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.
2. Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
3. Christianson, S., & Hubinette, B. (1992). Hands up! A study of witnesses’ emotional reac-tions and memories associated with bank robberies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 365-379.
4. Clifford, B., & Scott, J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352-359.
5. Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of age of eyewitness on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415-430.
6. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology and the law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Deffenbacher, K. A. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 13-40). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
8. Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41-51.
9. Farrington, D. P., & Lambert, S. (1997). Predicting offender profiles from victim and wit-ness descriptions. Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 133-158). Chicester, UK: Wiley.
10. Kassin, S. M., Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, V. L. (1989). The “general acceptance” of psy-chological research on eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.
11. Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perception of eyewitness factors in forensic investigations: A survey. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323-330.
12. Kebbell, M. R., & Wagstaff, G. E (1999). Face value? Evaluating the accuracy of eyewitness information. Police Research Series Paper 102. London: Home Office Research Development Statistics.
13. List, J. A. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developmental Psychology, 22, 50-57.
14. Loftus, E. E., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus.” Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.
15. Maass, A., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification: Simulating the “weapon effect.” Law and Human Behavior, 13, 397-408.
16. Mitchell, K. J., Livosky, M., & Mather, M. (1998). The weapon focus effects revisited: The role of novelty. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 287-303.
17. Ome, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With par-ticular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
18. Pezdek, K., & Prull, M. (1993). Fallacies in memories for conversations: Reflections on Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill and the like. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 299-310.
19. Pickel, K. L. (1998). Unusualness and threat as possible causes of “weapon focus.” Memory, 6, 277-295.
20. Ready, D. J., Bothwell, R. K., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The effects of hypnosis, context reinstatement, and anxiety on eyewitness memory. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45, 55-68.
21. Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choos-ing in eyewitness identification and face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 27, 538-552.
22. Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
23. Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and witnesses to rob-bery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 144-162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1987). Eyewitness testimony research: Current knowledge and emergent controversies. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 19, 363-388.
25. Yarmey, A. D., & Tressillian-Jones, H. P. (1982). Is the psychology of eyewitness identi-fication a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Eval-uating witness evidence (pp. 13-40). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.
27. Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory for a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.
28. Yuille, J. C., & Tollestrup, P. A. (1992). A model of the diverse effects of emotion on eye-witness memory. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 201-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.