Person descriptions and person identifications: Verbal overshadowing or recognition criterion shift?

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 497-528

  Sauerland, Melanie ^a   Holub, Franziska E ^b   Sporer, Siegfried L ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL OVERSHADOWING; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 41849105389     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440701728417     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Behrman, B. W., & Richards, R. E. (2005). Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: A reality monitoring analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 279-301.
2. Brigham, J. C., & Pressley, M. (1988). Cognitive monitoring and strategy choice in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 3, 249-257.
3. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in a multiple face presentation paradigm: Effects of description instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 873-885.
4. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2003). Verbal overshadowing of multiple face and car recognition: Effects of within- versus across-category verbal descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 183-201.
5. Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizing facial memory: Criterion effects in verbal overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 739-755.
6. Clifford, B. R. (2003). The verbal overshadowing effect: In search of a chimera. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Verwaeke, P. J. van Koppen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much ado about crime: Chapters on psychology and law (pp. 151-162). Brussels: Politeia.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.
9. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., O'Rourke, T. E., & Martens, T. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behaviour, 1, 113-134.
10. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
11. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). The verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
12. Finger, K. (2002). Mazes and music: Using perceptual processing to release verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 887-896.
13. Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The effect of the cognitive interview on face recognition accuracy: Release from verbal overshadowing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 340-348.
14. Franzen, S., & Sporer, S. L. (1994a). Personenverwechslungen durch irreführende Rekonstruktionsbilder: Zum Einfluss nachträglicher Informationen und der Wiederherstellung des Wahrnehmungskontextes [Person mixups as a function of misleading composites: On the influence of postevent information and context reinstatement]. In S. L. Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflussbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen (pp. 207-236). Marburg, Germany: N. G. Elwert.
15. Franzen, S., & Sporer, S. L. (1994b). Personenverwechslungen und Möglichkeiten ihrer Vermeidung: Können Augenzeugen durch Visualisierung gegen den Einfluss von irreführenden Rekonstruktionsbildern immunisiert werden? [Person mixups and possible countermeasures: Can eyewitnesses be inoculated against misleading composites through visualisation?]. In S. L. Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflussbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen (pp. 237-283). Marburg, Germany: N. G. Elwert.
16. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement and the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412.
17. Goldstein, A. G., Johnson, K. S., & Chance, J. (1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 15-18.
18. Grass, E. & Sporer, S. L. (1991, March). Zur Vorhersage von Identifizierungsleistungen durch weitere Aussagen von Zeugen [Correct or false? Post-dicting eyewitness identification accuracy from verbal statements]. Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of Experimental Psychologists, Giessen.
19. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-315.
20. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
21. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481-537.
22. Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. D. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58-69.
23. Lindsay, R. C. L., Martin, R., & Webber, L. (1994). Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy. Law & Human Behavior, 18, 527-541.
24. MacLin, O. H., Tapscott, R. L., & Malpass, R. S. (2002). The development of a computer system to collect descriptions of culprits. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 937-945.
25. Meissner, C. A. (2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.
26. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
27. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29, 176-186.
28. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Person descriptions as eyewitness evidence. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Susa, K. J. (2008). A theoretical review and meta-analysis of the description-identification relationship in memory for faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 414-455.
30. Memon, A., & Bartlett, J. (2002). The effects of verbalisation on face recognition in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 635-650.
31. Memon, A., & Rose, R. (2002). Identification abilities of children: Does a verbal description hurt face recognition? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 8, 229-242.
32. Neil v. Biggers, No. 409 US 188 (1972).
33. Pigott, M., & Brigham, J. C. (1985). Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 547-555.
34. Pigott, M. A., Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1990). A field study of the relationship between quality of eyewitnesses' descriptions and identification accuracy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 84-88.
35. Ryan, R. S., & Schooler, J. W. (1998). Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 105-125.
36. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalisation produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
37. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
38. Schooler, J. W., Fiore, S. M., & Brandimonte, M. A. (1997). At a loss from words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 293-334). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Schooler, J. W., Ryan, R. S., & Reder, L. (1996). The costs and benefits of verbally rehearsing memory for faces. In D. Herrmann, M. Johnson, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Basic and applied memory: New findings (pp. 51-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
41. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
42. Sporer, S. L. (1992a, March). An archival analysis of person descriptions. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Diego, CA.
43. Sporer, S. L. (1992b). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157-180.
44. Sporer, S. L. (1996). Psychological aspects of person descriptions. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 53-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Sporer, S. L. (2007). Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 13, 591-609.
46. Tunnicliff, J. L., & Clark, S. E. (1999). Unpublished raw data. Cited in C. A. Meissner & J. C. Brigham (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
47. Valentine, T., Pickering, A., & Darling, S. (2003). Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 969-993.
48. Van Koppen, P. J., & Lochun, S. K. (1997). Portraying perpetrators: The validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 661-685.
49. Wells, G. (1985). Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 619-626.
50. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychology experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
51. Wogalter, M. S. (1996). Describing faces from memory: Accuracy and effects on subsequent recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 40, 536-540.
52. Yu, C. J., & Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Effects of constructing identi-kit composites on photospread identification performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 280-292.