Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: A reality monitoring analysis

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 279-301

  Behrman, Bruce W ^a   Richards, Regina E ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyewitness; Lineup identification; Reality monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; LEGAL ASPECT; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RECOGNITION; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VISION;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 24044466822     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-005-3617-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Behrman, B. W. (2004). Numerical scaling of confidence phrases. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Behrman, B. W., & Davey, S. L. (2001). Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 475-491.
4. Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10-12 second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 951-962.
5. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
6. Egeth, H. E. (1993, May). What do we not know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 577-580.
7. Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Hay, D. C., Young, A. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1986). What happens when a face rings a bell? The automatic processing of famous faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 136-144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
9. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
10. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 371-376.
11. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
12. Loftus, E. F. (1993, May). Psychologists in the eyewitness world. American Psychologist, 48, 550-552.
13. Luus, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). Eyewitness identification confidence. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Norusis, M. J. (1997). SPSS Professional Statistics 7.5. Chicago: SPSS.
15. Penrod, S. (2003, Spring). Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, 54, 36-47.
16. Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). The nature of real, implanted and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 517-536.
17. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
18. Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, C. A., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171-181.
19. Sporer, S. L. (1994). Decision times and eyewitness accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 300-327). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. SPSS User's Guide (3rd ed.). (1988). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
21. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. (2001). Accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-473.
22. Stern, L. B., & Dunning, D. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications: A reality monitoring approach. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 273-299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 144-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Wells, G. L. (1993, May). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
25. Wells, G. L., Seelau, E. P., Rydell, S. M., & Luus, C. A. E. (1994). Recommendations for properly conducted lineup identification tasks. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 302-344). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1988). What is the best way to encode faces? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 163-168). New York: Wiley.
27. Wright, D. B., & McDaid, A. T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.
28. Yuille, J. C. (1993, May). We must study forensic eyewitnesses to know about them. American Psychologist, 48, 572-573.
29. Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory for a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.