Screening of embryos for numerical chromosome abnormalities during in-vitro fertilisation is not useful for application in daily practice;Screening van embryo's op numerieke chromosomale afwijkingen tijdens in-vitrofertilisatie niet bruikbaar voor toepassing in de dagelijkse praktijk

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 152, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 734-736

  Fauser, B C J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; BELGIUM; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MOSAICISM; SHORT SURVEY;

ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 41749114719     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (20)

1. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Echten-Arends J van, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9-17.
2. The practice committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1497-508.
3. Munne S, Cohen J. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1769-70.
4. Devroey P, Fauser BC. Preimplantation aneuploidy screening: a research tool for now. Lancet. 2007;370:1985-6.
5. Die-Smulders CE de, Land JA, Dreesen JC, Coonen E, Evers JL, Geraedts JP. Resultaten van 10 jaar preïmplantatiegenetische diagnostiek in Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004;148:2491-6.
6. Donoso P, Staessen C, Fauser BC, Devroey P. Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:15-25.
7. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:333-43.
8. Gianaroli L, Magli MG, Ferrareti AP, Tabanelli C, Trengia V, Farfalli V, et al. The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:633-40.
9. Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Pérez-Cano I, Mercader A, Mateu E, Buendía P, et al. FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:497-506.
10. Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J, Bernal A, Morris R, Taranissi M, et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-pregnosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:219-25.
11. Munné S, Fischer J, Warner A, Chen S, Zouves C, Cohen J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study. Referring Centers PGD Group. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:326-32.
12. Fauser BC, Devroey P, Macklon NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet. 2005;365:1807-16.
13. Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Terugplaatsing van slechts één embryo bij in-vitrofertilisatie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003;147:3101-4.
14. Heijnen EMEW, Eijkemans MJC, Klerk C de, Polinder S, Beckers NGM, Klinken ER, et al. Minder risico's, patiëntenongemak en kosten, maar niet minder zwangerschappen in de milde behandelstrategie voor ivf. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. [ter perse].
15. Staessen C, Platteau P, Assche E van, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2849-58.
16. Wilton L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:33-41.
17. Cohen J, Wells D, Munné S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:496-503.
18. Goossens V, de Rycke M, de Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:481-92.
19. Los FJ, Opstal D van, Berg C van den. The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:79-94.
20. Baart EB, Martini E, Berg I van den, Macklon NS, Galjaard RJ, Fauser BC, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:223-33.