Transfer of a single embryo in in-vitro fertilisation;Terugplaatsing van slechts één embryo bij in-vitrofertilisatie

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 147, Issue 27, 2003, Pages 1301-1304

  Macklon, N S ^a   Fauser, B C J M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OVARY; REVIEW; UTERUS;

ADULT; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE;

EID: 0038010139     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Nygren KG, Andersen AN. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European IVF-Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod 2001;16:384-91.
2. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1856-64.
3. Collins JA. An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:265-77.
4. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Royen E van, Meerssche M van de, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2581-7.
5. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomas C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1900-3.
6. Fauser BC, Bouchard P, Coelingh Bennink HJ, Collins JA, Devroey P, Evers JL, et al. Alternative approaches in IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:1-9.
7. Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 1998;339:573-7.
8. Land JA, Evers JLH. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod 2003;18:455-7.
9. Luke B, Keith LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med 1992;37:661-6.
10. Yokoyama Y, Shimizu T, Hayakawa K. Incidence of handicaps in multiple births and associated factors. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1995;44:81-91.
11. Callahan TL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Greene MF, Crowley jr WF. The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence. N Engl J Med 1994;331:244-9.
12. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Social determinants of human reproduction. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1518-26.
13. Schipper I, Hop WC, Fauser BC. The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold/window concept examined by different interventions with exogenous FSH during the follicular phase of the normal menstrual cycle: duration, rather than magnitude, of FSH increase affects follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83: 1292-8.
14. Hohmann FP, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:166-73.
15. Pelinck MJ, Hoek A, Simons AH, Heineman MJ. Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:129-39.
16. Royen E van, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Meerssche M van de, Ryckaert G, et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2345-9.
17. Huisman GJ, Fauser BC, Eijkemans MJ, Pieters MH. Implantation rates after in vitro fertilization and transfer of a maximum of two embryos that have undergone three to five days of culture. Fertil Steril 2000;73:117-22.
18. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:333-43.
19. Strandell A, Bergh C, Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2520-5.
20. Tur R, Barri PN, Coroleu B, Buxaderas R, Martinez F, Balasch J. Risk factors for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: evidence from a large series of 1878 consecutive pregnancies in a single centre. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:2124-9.
21. Hunault CC, Eijkemans MJ, Pieters MHEC, Velde ER te, Habbema JD, Fauser BC, et al. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;77:725-32.
22. Wølner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum Reprod 1998;13:88-94.
23. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 1999;14: 2392-5.
24. De Sutter P, Gerris J, Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2891-6.
25. Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Härkki P, Vuoristo P, Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1140-4.
26. Jong D de, Eijkemans MJ, Beckers NG, Pruijsten RV, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort? J Assist Reprod Genet 2002;19:561-8.
27. Kremer JAM, Beekhuizen W, Bots RSGM, Braat DDM, Dop PA van, Jansen CAM, et al. Resultaten van in-vitrofertilisatie in Nederland, 1996-2000. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002;146:2358-63.
28. Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002;78:449-54.
29. Huijbregts P, Smand C, Verduijn J. IVF/ICSI: aanbevelingen voor wijziging van de regeling op basis van de resultaten van effect- en evaluatieonderzoek. Publicatienr 02/91. Amstelveen: College voor zorgverzekeringen; 2002.