Assessment of seismic fragility of structures with consideration of the quality of construction

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 909-936

  Dimova, Silvia L ^a,b   Negro, Paolo ^b  

^a BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Bulgaria)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

EUROPEAN MACROSEISMIC SCALE; MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; SEISMIC FRAGILITY;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EUROPE;

EID: 33845729478     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2360671     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Biondini, F., and Toniolo, G., 2003. Seismic behaviour of concrete frames: Experimental and analytical verification of Eurocode 8 design rules, Proceedings of FIB 2003 Symposium, Athens.
2. Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J., 1993. Dynamics of Structures, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
3. Conseil de l'Europe, 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Cahier du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Sismologie, G. Gruenthal (editor), Luxemburg.
4. Dimova, S. L., and Hirata, K., 2000. Simplified seismic fragility analysis of structures with two types of friction devices, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29, 1153-1175.
5. Dimova, S. L., and Elenas, A., 2002. Seismic intensity parameters for fragility analysis of structures with energy dissipating devices, Struct. Safety 24, 1-28.
6. Dimova, S. L., and Negro, P., 2004. Influence of the Quality of Construction on the Seismic Vulnerability of Structures, EUR 21009 EN, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, IPSC.
7. Dimova, S. L., and Negro, P., 2005a. Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocode, Part 1: Experimental tests and their numerical simulation, Eng. Struct. 27, 709-723.
8. Dimova, S. L., and Negro, P., 2005b. Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocode, Part 2: Capacity and vulnerability, Eng. Struct. 27, 724-735.
9. Dimova, S. L., and Negro, P. 2005c. Influence of construction deficiencies on the seismic response of structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 613-635.
10. Dymiotis, C., 2002. Reliability based code calibration for earthquake resistant design, Proceedings of JCSS Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
11. Elenas, A., 1998. Interrelation between seismic acceleration parameters of European earthquakes and the structural behavior, Eur. Earthquake Eng. 12, 56-63.
12. Ellingwood, B. R., 1998. Issues related to structural aging in probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 62, 171-183.
13. Ellingwood, B. R., 2002. Earthquake risk assessment of building structures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74, 251-262.
14. Ellingwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A., 1980. Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58, NBS Special Publication 577, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
15. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 1993. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, ENV 1992-1-1, Draft January, Brussels.
16. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2001. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, ENV 1998-1-1, pr Draft No. 3, May, Brussels.
17. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2003a. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings, PrEN 1998-1, Final PT Draft, Stage 34 (Draft No. 3), January, Brussels.
18. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2003b. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, PrEN 1998-1, Final Draft, December, Brussels.
19. Ferrara, L., 2002. Design Calculations, Ecoleader research project: Seismic Behaviour of Re-inforced Concrete Industrial Buildings, Politecnico di Milano.
20. Ferrara, L., Colombo, A., Negro, P., and Toniolo, G., 2004. Precast vs. cast-in-situ reinforced concrete industrial buildings under earthquake loading: An assessment via pseudodynamic tests, Proceedings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 743, Vancouver, Canada.
21. Ferrara, L., and Negro, P., 2004. Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Structures: Test on the Cast-in-Situ Prototype, EUR 21097 EN, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, IPSC.
22. Ferrara, L., and Toniolo, G., 2004. Validation of seismic design criteria for concrete frames based on Monte Carlo simulation and full-scale pseudodynamic tests, Proceedings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 2581, Vancouver, Canada.
23. Hirata, K., Ootori, Y., and Somaki, T., 1993. Seismic fragility analysis for base-isolated structure, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 452, 11-19.
24. Holicky, M., and Markova, J., 2002. Calibration of reliability elements for a column, Proceedings of JCSS Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich.
25. Iman, R. L., and Conover, W. L., 1980. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models with application to risk assessment, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A9 (17), 1749-1842.
26. Joint Committee on Structural Safety, 2001. JCSS Probabilistic Model Code. http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/
27. Kanda, J., 1985. Probability-based seismic margin index for inelastic members of reactor buildings, Transitions of 8th SMiRT M1K2/5, pp. 353-359.
28. Kappos, A. J., 1990. Sensitivity of calculated inelastic seismic response to input motion characteristics, Proceedings, 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, pp. 25-34.
29. Kappos, A. J., and Kyriakakis, P., 2000. A re-evaluation of scaling techniques for natural records, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 20, 111-123.
30. Kennedy, R. P., and Ravindra, M. K., 1984. Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 79, 47-68.
31. Kwon, O. S., and Elnashai, A., 2004. A study of factors influencing analytical vulnerability curves of RC structures, Proceedings of International Workshop on Performance Based Design, Bled, Slovenia.
32. Loh, W. L., 1996. On Latin Hypercube sampling, The Annals of Statistics 24 (5), 2058-2080.
33. Lu, Y., Hong, H., Carydis, P. G., and Mouzakis, H., 2001. Seismic performance of RC frames designed for three different ductility levels, Eng. Struct. 23, 537-547.
34. Mirza, S. A., and MacGregor, J. G., 1979. Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars, ASCE J. Struct. Div. 105, Article ST5.
35. Molina, F. J., Verzeletti, G., Magonette, G., Buchet, Ph., and Géradin, M., 1999. Bi-directional pseudodynamic test of a full-size three-storey building, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 1541-1566.
36. Moreno, R., Barbat, A., and Pujades, L., 2004. Seismic fragility curves for framed buildings with flat beams, Struct. Eng. 1 (4), Article 11.
37. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) and Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2002. HAZUS99 Service Release 2 Technical Manual, Washington, D.C.
38. Naus, D. J., Ellingwood, B. R., and Graves, H. L., 2004. Methods for assessing NPP containment pressure boundary integrity, Nucl. Eng. Des. 228, 55-72.
39. Negro, P., Mola, E., Molina, J. F., and Magonette, G. E., 2004. Full scale bi-directional PsD testing of a torsionally unbalanced three-storey non-seismic RC frame, Proceedings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 968, Vancouver, Canada.
40. Panagiotakos, T. B., and Fardis, M. N., 2002. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate, ACI Struct. J. 98 (2), 135-148.
41. Park, R., 1989. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing, New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. Bull 22 (3), 155-166.
42. Pinto, P. E., Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., and Lupoi, G., 2004. Seismic fragility analysis of structural systems, Proceedings of International Workshop on Performance Based Design, Bled, Slovenia.
43. Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., Seligson, H. A., Scawthorn, C. R., Tobin, L. T., Young, R., and Boyd, T., 2003. Improving Loss Estimation for Woodframe Buildings, CUREEE Publication W18, Consortium of Universities for Earthquake Engineering, Richmond, CA.
44. Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, 2003. Norme tecniche per il progetto, la valutazione e l'adeguamento sismico degli edifici, Rome (in Italian).
45. Ravindra, M. K., 1997. Seismic individual plant examination of external events of US nuclear power plants: Insights and implications, Nucl. Eng. Des. 175, 227-236.
46. Rossetto, T., and Elnashai, A., 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data, Eng. Struct. 25, 1241-1263.
47. SAC Joint Venture, 2000a. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-350, Washington, D.C.
48. SAC Joint Venture, 2000b. Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-351, Washington, D.C.
49. Singhal, A., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1998. Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames, J. Struct. Eng. 124 (8), 922-929.
50. Tantala, M. W., and Deodatis, G., 2002. Development of seismic fragility curves for tall buildings, Proceedings of 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Columbia University, New York.
51. Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G., 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 581-626.
52. Valles, R. E., Reinhorn, A. M., Kunnath, S. K., Li, C., and Madan, A., 1996. IDARC 2D. A Computer Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Buildings, Technical Report NCEER-96-0010, University of New York at Buffalo, New York.