Effect of imagined movement speed on subsequent motor performance

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 117-132

  Louis, Magali ^a   Guillot, Aymeric ^a   Maton, Sylvain ^a   Doyon, Julien ^b   Collet, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mental chronometry; Motor imagery; Motor learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TIME; TRAINING; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MARTIAL ARTS; MOVEMENT; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 41549084258     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.40.2.117-132     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bargh, J. A., Chen, C., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation of action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
2. Barr, K., & Hall, C. (1992). The use of imagery by rowers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 243-261.
3. Boschker, M. S. J., Bakker, F. C., & Rietberg, M. B. (2000). Retroactive interference effects of mentally imagined movement speed. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 593-603.
4. Calmels, C., & Fournier, J. F. (2001). Duration of physical and mental execution of gymnastic routines. Sport Psychologist, 15, 142-150.
5. Calmels, C., Holmes, P., Lopez, E., & Naman, V. (2006). Chronometric comparison of actual and imaged complex movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 339-348.
6. Collet, C., Dittmar, A., & Vernet-Maury, E. (1999). L'activité neurovégétative enregistrée en conditions réelles et en simulation par imagerie mentale chez des haltérophiles de haut-niveau [Neurovegetative activity recorded during actual execution and motor imagery in elite weightlifters]. In P. Lanteri, A. Midol, & I. Rogowski (Eds.), Les sciences de la performance à l'aube du XXIème siècle (pp. 263-269). Lyon, France: Centre Jacques Cartier.
7. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
8. Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain Cognition, 11, 87-97.
9. Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., et. al. (1994, October 13). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371(6498), 600-602.
10. de Lange, F. P., Helmich, R. C., & Toni, I. (2006). Posture influences motor imagery: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 33, 609-617.
11. Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 161-167.
12. Doyon, J., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Functional anatomy of motor skill learning. In L. R. Squire & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 225-238). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 79, 481-491.
14. Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 25-57.
15. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: A review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 10-20.
16. Guillot, A., Collet, C., & Dittmar, A. (2004). Relationship between visual and kinaesthetic imagery, field dependence-independence, and complex motor skills. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 190-198.
17. Guillot, A., Haguenauer, M., Dittmar, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Effect of a fatiguing protocol on motor imagery accuracy. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 95, 186-190.
18. Hall, C., Bernoties, L., & Schmidt, D. (1995). Interference effects of mental imagery on a motor task. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 181-190.
19. Hall, C., & Martin, K. A. (1997). Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21(1-2), 143-154.
20. Jackson, P. L., Lafleur, M. F., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2001). Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 1133-1141.
21. Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett lecture: To act or not to act - Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
22. Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735-739.
23. Johnson, S. J. (2000). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgments of prehension. Cognition, 74, 33-77.
24. Kobayashi, H. (1994). The effects of rhythmic pattern imagery on free throws. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
25. Koch, I., Keller, P., & Prinz, W. (2004). The ideomotor approach to action control: Implications for skilled performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 362-375.
26. Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 90-94.
27. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
28. Lafleur, M. F., Jackson, P. L., Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Evans, A. C., & Doyon, J. (2002). Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements. NeuroImage, 16, 142-157.
29. Lorant, J., & Nicolas, A. (2004). Validation of the French translation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised version (MIQ-R). Science & Motricité, 53, 58-68.
30. Maruff, P., & Velakoulis, D. (2000). The voluntary control of motor imagery. Imagined movements in individuals with feigned impairment and conversion disorder. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1251-1260.
31. McIntyre, T., & Moran, A. (1996). Imagery use among canoeists: A worldwide survey of non-elite and elite slalomists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, S132.
32. Munroe, K. J., Giacobbi, P. R., Jr., Hall, C., & Weinberg, R. (2000). The four Ws of imagery use: Where, when, why, and what. Sport Psychologist, 14, 119-137.
33. Nideffer, R. M. (1985). Athlete's guide to mental training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
34. Oishi, K., Kasai, T., & Maeshima, T. (2000). Autonomic response specificity during motor imagery. Journal of Physiology and Anthropology of Applied Human Sciences, 19, 255-261.
35. Orliaguet, J. P., & Coello, Y. (1998). Differences between actual and imagery putting movements in golf: A chronometrics analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 157-169.
36. Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., Skoura, X., & Schieppati, M. (2002). Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behavioural Brain Research, 134(1-2), 209-215.
37. Porro, C. A., Cettolo, V., Francescato, M. P., & Baraldi, P. (2000). Ipsilateral involvement of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. European Journal of Neurosciences, 12, 3059-3063.
38. Powell, G. E. (1973). Negative and positive mental practice in motor skill acquisition. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 37, 312.
39. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
40. Reed, C. L. (2002). Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1169-1178.
41. Roure, R., Collet, C., Deschaumes-Molinaro, C., Dittmar, A., Rada, H., Delhomme, G., et al. (1998). Autonomic nervous system responses correlate with mental rehearsal in volleyball training. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 78, 99-108.
42. Roure, R., Collet, C., Deschaumes-Molinaro, C., Dittmar, A., Rada, H., Delhomme, G., et al. (1999). Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiology & Behavior, 66, 63-72.
43. Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546-550.
44. Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
45. Seidler, R. D. (2004). Multiple motor learning experiences enhance motor adaptability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 65-73.
46. Taylor, J. (1993). The mental edge for alpine ski racing (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Minuteman Press.
47. Unestahl, L. E. (1983). Inner mental training. Orebro, Sweden: Veje.
48. Vieilledent, S. (1996). Etude de la simulation d'un mouvement complexe en situation naturelle: Le cas de l'escalade sportive [Mental simulation of a complex motor skill in a climbing situation]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris.
49. Watson, M. E., & Rubin, D. C. (1996). Spatial imagery preserves temporal order. Memory, 4, 515-534.
50. White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 169-180.
51. Woolfolk, R. L., Murphy, S. M., Gottesfeld, D., & Aitken, D. (1985). Effects of mental rehearsal of task motor activity and mental depiction of task outcome on motor skill performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 191-197.
52. Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660.