Delimiting species boundaries in Rosa sect. Cinnamomeae (Rosaceae) in eastern North America

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 819-836

  Joly, Simon ^a,b   Bruneau, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP); Multivariate analyses; Polyploidy; Rosa; Species delimitation; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ROSA ARKANSANA; ROSA BLANDA; ROSA CAROLINA; ROSA FOLIOLOSA; ROSA NITIDA; ROSA PALUSTRIS; ROSA VIRGINIANA; ROSA WOODSII; ROSACEAE;

EID: 38349112674     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407783390863     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ANDERSON, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. New York: John Wiley.
2. _ and L. HUBRICHT. 1938. Hybridization in Tradescantia III. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. American Journal of Botany 25: 396-402.
3. BARTON, N. H. and G. M. HEWITT. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 16: 113-148.
4. BENHAM, J. J. 2001. Genographer, version 1.6.0. Bozeman, Montana: Montana State University.
5. BRUNEAU, A., S. JOLY, J. R. STARR, and J.-N. DROUIN. 2005. Molecular markers indicate that the narrow Québec endemics Rosa rousseauiorum and Rosa williamsii are synonymous with the widespread Rosa blanda. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 386-398.
6. _, J. R. STARR, and S. JOLY. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Rosa: new evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences and appraisal of current knowledge. Systematic Botany 32: 366-378.
7. CRÉPIN, F. 1889. Sketch of a new classification of roses. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 11: 217-228.
8. _. 1896. Rosae Americanae I. Observations upon the genus Rosa in North America. Botanical Gazette 22: 1-34.
9. DIAMOND, J. M. 1992. Horrible plant species. Nature 360: 627-628.
10. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
11. ENDLER, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
12. ERLANSON, E. W. 1929. Cytological conditions and evidences for hybridity in North America wild roses. Botanical Gazette 87: 443-506.
13. _. 1930. The phenological procession in North American wild roses in relation to the polyploid series. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 11: 137-150.
14. _. 1934. Experimental data for a revision of the North American wild roses. The Botanical Gazette 96: 197-259.
15. ERLANSON MACFARLANE, E. W. 1966. The old problem of species in Rosa with special reference to North America. American Rose Annual 51: 150-160.
16. FERNALD, M. L. 1922. Notes on the Flora of western Nova Scotia 1921. Rhodora 24: 157-180.
17. GHISELIN, M. T. 1975. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23: 536-544.
18. HEISER, JR., C. B., J. SORIA, and D. L. BURTON. 1965. A numerical taxonomic study of Solanum species and hybrids. The American Naturalist 99: 471-488.
19. HULL, D. L. 1976. Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology 25: 174-191.
20. IHAKA, R. and R. GENTLEMAN. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 299-314.
21. JACCARD, P. 1900. Contribution au problème de l'immigration post-glaciaire de la flore alpine. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 36: 87-130.
22. JENSEN, R. J. and W. H. ESHBAUGH. 1976. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus I. Populations of restricted areal distribution and low taxonomic diversity. Systematic Botany 1: 1-10.
23. _, S. C. HOKANSON, J. G. ISEBRANDS, and J. F. HANCOCK. 1993. Morphometric variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: evidence of hybridization between Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1358-1366.
24. JOLY, S. 2006. Évolution des roses (Rosa: Rosaceae) indigènes de la section Cinnamomeae à l'est des Montagnes Rocheuses. Ph.D. dissertation. Montréal, Canada: Université de Montréal.
25. _ and A. BRUNEAU. 2006. Incorporating allelic variation for reconstructing the evolutionary history of organisms from multiple genes: an example from Rosa in North America. Systematic Biology 55: 623-636.
26. _, J. R. STARR, W. H. LEWIS, and A. BRUNEAU. 2006. Polyploid and hybrid evolution in roses east of the Rocky Mountains. American Journal of Botany 93: 412-425.
27. KNOPS, J. F. and R. J. JENSEN. 1980. Morphological and phenolic variation in a three species community of red oaks. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 418-428.
28. KRAMER, C. Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12: 309-310.
29. LEVIN, D. A. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. LEWIS, W. H. 1957. A monograph of the genus Rosa in North America east of the Rocky Mountains. Ph.D. thesis University of Virginia.
31. _. 1958. A monograph of the genus Rosa in North America. II. R. foliolosa. The Southwestern Naturalist 3: 145-153.
32. _. 1959. A monograph of the genus Rosa in North America. I. R. acicularis. Brittonia 11: 1-24.
33. _. 1962. Monograph of the genus Rosa in North America. IV. R. x dulcissima. Brittonia 14: 65-71.
34. _. 1966. Chromosome numbers of phanerogams. 1. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 53: 100-101.
35. _ and R. E. BASYE. 1961. Analysis of nine crosses between diploid Rosa species. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 78: 573-579.
36. MAECHLER, M. 2005. Cluster: Cluster analysis, version 1.10.2.
37. MAYR, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. MCDADE, L. A. 1997. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. III. Comparison with distance methods. Systematic Botany 22: 669-683.
39. NEFF, N. A. and G. R. SMITH. 1978. Multivariate analysis of hybrid fishes. Systematic Zoology 28: 176-196.
40. ORNDUFF, R. and T. J. CROVELLO. 1968. Numerical taxonomy of Limanthaceae. American Journal of Botany 55: 173-182.
41. PERNÝ, M., A. TRIBSCH, T. F. STUESSY, and K. MARHOLD. 2005. Allopolyploid origin of Cardamine silana (Brassicaceae) from Calabria (southern Italy): karyological, morphological and molecular evidence. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 148: 101-116.
42. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.2.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
43. RAMON, S. 1968. A numerical taxonomic study of certain taxa of Haplopappus, section Blepharodon. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 47: 863-900.
44. RAMSEY, J. and D. W. SCHEMSKE. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
45. RATSEK, J. C., W. S. FLORY JR., and S. H. YARNELL. 1940. Crossing relations of some diploid and polyploid species of roses. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 38: 637-654.
46. _, S. H. YARNELL, and W. S. FLORY JR. 1939. Crossing relations of some diploid species of roses. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 37: 983-992.
47. RIESEBERG, L. H., T. E. WOOD, and E. J. BAACK. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
48. RIPLEY, B. 2005. Tree: classification and regression trees, version 1.0-20.
49. ROSENTHAL, D. M., A. E. SCHWARZBACH, L. A. DONOVAN, O. RAYMOND, and L. H. RIESEBERG. 2002. Phenotypic differentiation between three ancient hybrid taxa and their parental species. International Journal of Plant Science 163: 387-398.
50. RYDBERG, A. 1920. Roses of northeastern America. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 47: 45-66.
51. SCHILLING, E. E. and C. B. HEISER JR. 1976. Re-examination of a numerical taxonomic study of Solanum species and hybrids. Taxon 25: 451-462.
52. SNEATH, P. H. A. and R. R. SOKAL. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
53. SUDA, J. and M. A. LYSÁK. 2001. A taxonomic study of the Vaccinium sect. Oxycoccus (Hill) W.D.J. Koch (Ericaceae) in the Czech Republic and adjacent territories. Folia Geobotanica 36: 303-320.
54. TUKEY, J. 1953. A problem of multiple comparisons. Mimeographed manuscript. Reprinted as pp.1-300 in The collected works of John W Tukey Vol. VIII. Multiple comparisons : 1948-1983, ed. H. I. Braun. New York: Chapman and Hall.
55. VANDERHOEVEN, S., O. HARDY, X. VEKEMENS, C. LEFÈVRE, M. DE LOOSE, J. LAMBINON, and P. MEERTS. 2002. A morphometric study of populations of the Centaurea jacea complex (Asteraceae) in Belgium. Plant Biology 4: 403-412.
56. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, A. FRIJTERS, J. POT, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER, and M. ZABEAU. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
57. WARD, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optmize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236-244.
58. WHIFFIN, T. 1973. Analysis of a hybrid swarm between Heterocentron elegans and H. glandulosum. Taxon 22: 413-423.
59. WISSEMANN, V. and C. M. RITZ. 2005. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 275-290.