Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians

Academic Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 364-370

  Ramsey, Paul G ^a,e   Carline, Jan D ^b   Blank, Linda L ^c   Wenrich, Marjorie D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UWSM

^c AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UWSM   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPETENCE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOB PERFORMANCE; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSIBILITY; SKILL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 0029875046     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199604000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993;269:1655-60.
2. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, et al. Predictive validity of certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:719-26.
3. Carline JD, Wenrich MD, Ramsey PG. Characteristics of ratings of physician competence by professional associates. Eval Health Prof. 1989; 12:409-23.
4. Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Ramsey PG. Relationship between quality of training programs and internists' subsequent practice performance. Teach Learn Med. 1995;7:13-7.
5. Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med. 1993;68:680-7.
6. Petersdorf RG. Defining the good doctor. JAMA. 1993;269:1681-2.
7. Norcini JJ. Recertification in the medical specialties. Acad Med. 1994;69(10 suppl):S90-S94.
8. Winer B. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill International, 1971:283-96.
9. Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA. 1992;267:958-60.
10. McLeod PJ, Tamblyn R, Benaroya S, Snell L. Faculty ratings of resident humanism predict patient satisfaction ratings in ambulatory medical clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:321-6.
11. Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses. Acad Med. 1994;69: 216-24.
12. Webster G. Final Report on the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Project. Philadelphia, PA: American Board of Internal Medicine, 1989.
13. Haber RJ, Avins AL. Do ratings on the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form detect differences in clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:140-5.
14. Risucci DA, Tortolani AJ, Ward RJ. Ratings of surgical residents by self-supervisors, and peers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;169:519-26.