Cross-language mediated priming: Effects of context and lexical relationship

Bilingualism

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 95-110

  Schwartz, Ana I ^a   da Luz Fontes, Ana B Arěas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40649097826     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728907003239     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A. & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24, 477-492.
2. Binder, K. S. & Morris, R. K. (1995). Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1186-1196.
3. Chen, H.-C. & Ng, M.-L. (1989). Semantic facilitation and translation priming effects in Chinese-English bilinguals. Memory and Cognition 17, 454-462.
4. De Bruijn, E. R. A., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J. & Schriefers, H. J. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from eventrelated potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 155-168.
5. De Groot, A. M. B. & Nas, G. L. J. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 90-123.
6. Dijkstra, T., De Bruijn, E., Schriefers, H. & Brinke, S. T. (2000). More on interlingual homograph recognition: Language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 69-78.
7. Dijkstra, T. & Van Hell, J. G. (2003). Testing the language mode hypothesis using trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6, 2-16.
8. Dijkstra, T. & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197.
9. Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld & H. & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
10. Dopkins, S., Morris, R. K. & Rayner, K. (1992). Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 461-476.
11. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K. & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-446.
12. Elston-Güttler, K. (2000). An enquiry into cross-language differences in lexical-conceptual relationships and their effect on L2 lexical processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
13. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C. & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 57-70.
14. Folk, J. R. & Morris, R. K. (1995). Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1412-1429.
15. Gernsbacher M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanism in language comprehension: The structure building framework. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Advances in Research and Theory 27), pp. 217-263. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The Structure-Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K. Britton (ed.), Models of understanding text, pp. 289-311. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Attenuating interference during comprehension: The role of suppression. In D. L. Medin (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory vol. 37), pp. 85-104. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1991a). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
20. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1991b). The role of suppression in sentence comprehension. In Simpson (ed.), pp. 97-128.
21. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1995). Skilled suppression. In F. N. Dempster (ed.), Interference and inhibition in cognition, pp. 295-327. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Gemsbacher M. A., Varner, K. R. & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430-445.
23. Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I. & Frost, R. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1122-1139.
24. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
25. Greenberg, S. N. & saint-Aubin, J. (2004). Letter detection for homographs with different meanings in different language texts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 241-253.
26. Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings and models. In A. M. B. De Groot & J. F. Kroll (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, pp. 225-254. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K. & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-229.
28. Jared, D. & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 2-31.
29. Kotz, S. A. & Elston-Güttler, K. (2004). The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 215-235.
30. Morris, R. K., Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 268-281.
31. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, pp. 264-336. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Onifer, W. & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and constextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225-236.
33. Pallier, C., Colomé, A. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12, 445-449.
34. Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics m word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 545-551.
35. Raaijimakers, J. G. W. (2003). A further look at the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57, 141-151.
36. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C. & Gremmen, F. (1999) How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
37. Rayner, K. & Morris, R. K. (1991). Comprehension processes in reading ambiguous sentences: Reflections from eye movements. In Simpson (ed.), pp. 175-198.
38. Schwanenflugel, P. J. & Rey, M. (1986). Interlingual semantic facilitation: Evidence for a common representational system in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 605-618.
39. Schwartz, A. I. & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 197-212.
40. Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F. & Diaz, M. (2007). reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 106-129.
41. Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C. & O'Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science, 14, 328-333.
42. Silverberg, S. & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 381-398.
43. SimpsonG. B. (ed.) (1991). Understanding word and sentence (Advances in psychology 77). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
44. Simpson, G. B. & Kreuger, M. A. (1991). Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627-643.
45. Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.
46. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
47. Tabossi, P. & Zardon, F. (1993). Processing ambiguous words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 359-372.
48. Tzelgov, J. & Eben-Ezra, S. (1992). Components of the betweenlanguage semantic priming effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 253-272.
49. Van Hell, J. G. (1998). Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
50. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T. & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition, Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.
51. von Studnitz, R. E. & Green, D. W. (2002) Interlingual homograph interference in German-English biliguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 1-23.