Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 545-551

  Pecher, Diane ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MULTILINGUALISM; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035460665     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196190     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1982). Phonological receding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. AZUMA, T., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Why SAFE is better than FAST: The relatedness of a word's meanings affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 484-504.
3. BOROWSKY, R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 63-85.
4. BURGESS, C., & LIVESAY, K. (1998). The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 30, 272-277.
5. CELEX ENGLISH DATABASE (Release E25) [On-line]. (1993). Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information.
6. CLARK, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
7. COLTHEART, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505. Available: http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/MRCDataBase/uwa_mrc.htm
8. DE GROOT, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 824-845.
9. FARRAR, W. T., VAN ORDEN, G. C., & HAMOUZ, V. (1998). When SOFA primes TOUCH: Interdependence of spelling, phonology and meaning in "semantically-mediated" priming. Manuscript in preparation.
10. GLUSHKO, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 674-691.
11. JASTRZEMBSKI, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278-305.
12. JOORDENS, S., & BESNER, D. (1994). When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1051-1062.
13. KELLAS, G., FERRARO, F. R., & SIMPSON, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 601-609.
14. MASSON, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition, 21, 3-23.
15. MCNAMARA, T. P. (1992). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1173-1190.
16. MEYER, D. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
17. PECHER, D., ZEELENBERG, R., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 401-418.
18. PEEREMAN, R., CONTENT, A., & BONIN, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 151-174.
19. PEXMAN, P. M., & LUPKER, S. J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323-334.
20. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
21. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., SANDERS, M., & LANGER, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
22. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
23. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
24. STRAIN, E., PATTERSON, K., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
25. TARRABAN, R., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 608-631.
26. VAN HELL, J. G. (1998). Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
27. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). The interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
28. WEBSTER'S ENCYCLOPEDIC UNABRIDGED DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (1989). New York: Gramercy Books.
29. WHITTEN, W. B., SUTER, W. N., & FRANK, M. L. (1979). Bidirectional Synonym Ratings of 464 Noun Pairs. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 109-127.
30. WILDING, J., & MOHINDRA, N. (1983). Preferred synonyms for each noun of 279 synonym pairs. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 91-106.
31. ZIEGLER, J. C., & FERRAND, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
32. ZIEGLER, J. C., MONTANT, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 533-554.
33. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.