Molecular dynamics simulations of domain motions of substrate-free S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase in solution

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 131-143

  Hu, Chen ^a   Fang, Jianwen ^a   Borchardt, Ronald T ^a   Schowen, Richard L ^a   Kuczera, Krzysztof ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion; Domain motions; Hinge bending; Molecular dynamics simulations; Protein dynamics; Rotational; S adenosyl L homocysteine hydrolase

Indexed keywords

ADENOSYLHOMOCYSTEINASE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; SOLVENT; TETRAMER;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CRYSTAL; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; VIBRATION;

ADENOSYLHOMOCYSTEINASE; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIMERIZATION; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 40549140147     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21664     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Turner MA, Yang X, Ying D, Kuczera K, Borchardt RT, Howell PL. Structure and Function of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Cell Biochem Biophys 2000;33:101-125.
2. Wang M. The role of domain motion in the structure and catalytic activity of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. PhD Thesis, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 2005.
3. Smolin LA, Benevenga NJ. Methionine, homocysteine, and cysteine-metabolic interrelationships. In: Absorption and utilization of amino acids, Vol. 1. Friedman M, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. pp 157-187.
4. Schnyder G, Roffi M, Pin R, Flammer Y, Lange H, Eberli FR, Meier B, Turi ZG, Hess OM. Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1593-1600.
5. Dimmock NJ, Primrose SB. Introduction of modern virology. London: Blackwell Sciences; 1994.
6. Narayan P, Rottman FM. Methylation of mRNA. In: Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology, Vol. 65. Meister A, editor. New York: Wiley; 1992. pp 255-285.
7. Ueland PM, Resfsum H, Brattstrom L. Plasma homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. In: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hemostasis, and endothelial function. Francis RB, Jr, editor. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. pp 183-196.
8. Turner MA, Yuan C-S, Borchardt RT, Hershfield MS, Smith GD, Howell PL. Structure and function of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:369-376.
9. Hu Y, Komoto J, Huang Y, Gomi T, Ogawa H, Takata Y, Fujioka M, Takusagawa F. Crystal structure of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase from Rat Liver. Biochemistry 1999;38:8323-8333.
10. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
11. Huang Y, Komoto J, Takata Y, Powell DR, Gomi T, Ogawa H, Fujioka M, Takusagawa F. Inhibition of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase by acyclic sugar adenosine analogue D-eritadenine. Crystal structure of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase complexed with D-eritadenine. J Biol Chem 2002;277:7477-7482.
12. Komoto J, Huang Y, Gomi T, Ogawa H, Takata Y, Fujioka M and Takusagawa F. Effects of site-directed mutagenesis on structure and function of recombinant rat liver S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Crystal structure of D244E mutant enzyme. J Biol Chem 2000;275:32147-32156.
13. Wang M, Unruh JR, Johnson CK, Kuczera K, Schowen RL, Borchardt RT. Effects of ligand binding and oxidation on hinge-bending motions in S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Biochemistry 2006;45:7778-7786.
14. Yin D, Yang X, Hu Y, Kuczera K, Schowen RL, Borchardt RT, Squier TC. Substrate binding stabilizes S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in a closed conformation. Biochemistry 2000;39:9811-9818.
15. Wang M, Borchardt RT, Schowen RL, Kuczera K. Domain motions and the open-to-closed conformational transition of an enzyme: a normal mode analysis of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Biochemistry 2005;44:7228-7239.
16. Brooks CL, III, Karplus M, Pettitt BM. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. New York: Wiley; 1988.
17. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:646-652.
18. Ma JP, Sigler PB, Xu ZH, Karplus MA. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J Mol Biol 2000;302:303-313.
19. Shen T, Tai K, Henchman RH, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics of acetylcholinesterase. Acc Chem Res 2002;35:332-340.
20. Young MA, Gonfloni S, Superti-Furga G, Roux B, Kuriyan J. Dynamic coupling between the SH2 and SH3 domains of c-Src and hck underlies their inactivation by C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation. Cell 2001;105:115-126.
21. Yang C, Jas GS, Kuczera K. Structure, dynamics and interaction with kinase targets: computer simulations of calmodulin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1697:289-300.
22. Takata Y, Yamada T, Huang Y, Komoto J, Gomi T, Ogawa H, Fujioka M, Takusagawa F. Catalytic mechanism of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Site-directed mutagenesis of Asp-130, Lys-185, Asp-189, and Asn-190. J Biol Chem 2002;277:22670-22676.
23. Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JW, Ross WR, Cheatham TE, III, DeBolt S, Ferguson D, Seibel G, Kollman P. AMBER, a computer program for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to elucidate the structures and energies of molecules. Comp Phys Commun 1995;91:1-41.
24. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
25. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem 2000;21:1049-1074.
26. (a) Bryce R. AMBER parameter database. http://pharmacy.man.ac.uk/amber/, 2005;
27. (b) Walker RC, de Souza MM, Mercer IP, Gould IR, Klug DR. Large and fast relaxations inside a protein: calculation and measurement of reorganization energies in alcohol dehydrogenase. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:11658-11665;
28. (c) Pavelites JJ, Gao JL, Bash PA, Mackerell AD. A molecular mechanics force field for NAD(+), NADH, and the pyrophosphate groups of nucleotides. J Comput Chem 1997;18:221-239.
29. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935.
30. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
31. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327.
32. Sagui C, Darden TA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1999;28:155-179.
33. Brooks BR, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macro molecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
34. Garcia AE. Nonlinear dynamics of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1992;68:2696-2699.
35. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Van Aalten DMF, Berendsen HJC. An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1996;13:615-626.
36. Ehrenberg M, Rigler R. Polarized fluorescence and rotational Brownian motion. Chem Phys Lett 1972;14:539-544.
37. Chuang TJ, Eisenthal KB. Theory of fluorescence depolarization anisotropic rotational diffusion. J Chem Phys 1972;57:5094-5097.
38. Shoemaker DP, Garland CW, Nibler JW. Experiments in physical chemistry, 6th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 1996.
39. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
40. Jas GS, Larson EJ, Johnson CK, Kuczera K. Microscopic details of rotational diffusion of perylene in organic solvents: molecular dynamics simulations and experiment vs. Debye-Stokes-Einstein theory. J Phys Chem A 2000;104:9841-9852.
41. Hu C, Kuczera K.Images and animations of S-adenosyl-L- homocysteine hydrolase dynamics in solution. http://129.237.102.17/~kuczera/ 1ky4.html, 2005.
42. Lipari G, Szabo A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. II. Analysis of experimental results. J Am Chem Soc 1982;104:4559-4570.
43. Lipari G, Szabo A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. I. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 1982;104:4546-4559.
44. Brooks CL, III, Karplus M, Pettitt BM. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. New York: Wiley; 1988.
45. Lamm G, Sabo A. Langevin modes of macromolecules. J Chem Phys 1986;85:7334-7348.
46. Hayward S, Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N. Effect of solvent on collective motions in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1993;234:1207-1217.