Fairness, self-interest, and cooperation in a real-life conflict

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 684-704

  Müller, Markus M ^a,c   Kals, Elisabeth ^a   Maes, Jürgen ^b  

^a Catholic University   (Germany)

^b BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

^c CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749155377     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00322.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abell, P. (Ed 1991). Rational choice theory. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York : Basic Books.
3. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
4. Biel, A. (2000). Factors promoting cooperation in the laboratory, in common pool resource dilemmas, and in large-scale dilemmas: Similarities and differences. In M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. R. Tyler A. Biel (Eds Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states, and organizations (pp. 25 41). London : Routledge.
5. Clayton, S. (2000). Models of justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 459 474.
6. nd ed Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. De Cremer, D. (2003). Noneconomic motives predicting cooperation in public good dilemmas: The effect of received respect on contributions. Social Justice Research, 16, 367 377.
8. De Cremer, D. van Dijk, E. (2003). Fairness and ethics in social decision making. Social Justice Research, 16, 191 194.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W. Carnevale, P. J. (2003). Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235 291). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
10. Dawes, R. M. Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111 116.
11. Elster, J. (Ed 1986). Rational choice. Oxford, UK : Basil Blackwell.
12. nd ed Boston : Houghton-Mifflin.
13. Kals, E. (1999). Der Mensch nur ein zweckrationaler Entscheider? Is man only a calculating rational decision maker? Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 7, 267 293.
14. Kals, E. Russell, Y. (2001). Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining proenvironmental decision making. Social Justice Research, 14, 367 385.
15. Kerr, N. L., Garst, J., Lewandowski, D. A. Harris, S. E. (1997). That still, small voice: Commitment to cooperate as an internalized versus a social norm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1300 1311.
16. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg R. H. Willis (Eds Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27 55). New York : Plenum.
17. Mikula, G. Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 136 135.
18. Montada, L. (1992). Moralische Gefühle [Moral feelings]. In W. Edelstein, G. Nunner-Winkler G. Noam (Eds Moral und Person (pp. 259 277). Frankfurt, Germany : Suhrkamp.
19. Montada, L. (1996). Tradeoffs between justice and self-interest. In L. Montada M. J. Lerner (Eds Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 259 275). New York : Plenum.
20. Montada, L. (1998). Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Research, 9, 81 101.
21. Montada, L. Kals, E. (2000). Political implications of psychological research on ecological justice and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 168 176.
22. Montada, L., Kals, E. Becker, R. (2007). Willingness for continued responsible commitment: A new concept in environmental research. Environment and Behavior, 39, 287 316.
23. Montada, L. Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313 344.
24. Müller, M. M. Kals, E. (2007). Interactions between procedural fairness and outcome favorability in conflict situations. In K. Y. Törnblom R. Vermunt (Eds Distributive and procedural justice (pp. 125 140). Aldershot, UK : Ashgate.
25. Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 355 375.
26. Pruitt, D. G. Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA : Brooks/Cole.
27. Rapoport, A. Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press.
28. Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588 597.
29. Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286 297.
30. Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheitsskala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The social-desirability-scale-17: Development and first results concerning reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173 177.
31. Syme, G. Nancarrow, B. E. (Eds 2001). Social justice and environmental management. Social Justice Research, 14, 343 347.
32. Tyler, T. R. Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia : Taylor & Francis.
33. Tyler, T. R. Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349 361.
34. Tyler, T. R. Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B. A. Mellers J. Baron (Eds Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 87 108). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
35. Van Vugt, M. (2002). Central, individual, or collective control? Social dilemma strategies for natural resource management. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 783 800.
36. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E. Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric interpretations of fairness in asymmetric, environmental social dilemmas: Explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 111 126.
37. Zey, M. (Ed 1992). Decision making: Alternatives to rational choice models. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.