Fairness and ethics in social decision making

Social Justice Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 191-194

  De Cremer, David ^a   Van Dijk, Eric ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043144144     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025989927725     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Bazerman, M. H. (2001). The study of "real" decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Making 14: 353-384.
2. Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, Wiley, New York.
3. De Cremer, D., and Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 126-136.
4. Kelley, H. H. (2000). The proper study of social psychology. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63: 3-15.
5. Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46: 183-207.
6. Milinski, M., Semmann, D., and Krambeck, H.-J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the "tragedy of the commons." Nature 415: 424-426.
7. Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., and Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O., and Clark, M. S. (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 359-387.
8. Rusbult, C. E., and van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54: 351-375.
9. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man, Wiley, New York.
10. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1131.
11. Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.
12. Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on supports of authorities. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 482-497.