Limited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 65-81

  Dill, Marcus ^a   Fahle, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0031602344     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211918     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. ANDERSON, C. H., & VAN ESSEN, D. C. (1987). Shifter circuits: A computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84, 6297-6301.
2. ARNOULT, M. D. (1954). Shape discrimination as a function of the angular orientation of the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 323-328.
3. BACH, M. (1996) The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test - Automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry & Vision Sciences, 73, 49-53.
4. BAGNARA, S., SIMION, F., & UMILTÀ, C. (1984). Reference patterns and the process of normalization, Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 186-192.
5. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
6. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 121-133.
7. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
8. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1993). Evaluating object recognition theories by computer graphics psychophysics. In T. A. Poggio & D. A. Glaser (Eds.), Exploring brain functions: Models in neuroscience (pp. 139-164). New York: Wiley.
9. BUNDESEN, C., & LARSEN, A. (1975). Visual transformation of size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 214-220.
10. CARR, T. H., POSNER, M. I., POLLATSEK, A., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1979). Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 389-414.
11. CAVANAGH, P. (1978). Size and position invariance in the visual system. Perception, 7, 167-177.
12. CERELLA, J. (1990). Pigeon pattern perception: Limits on perspective invariance. Perception, 19, 141-159.
13. CHIGNELL, M. H., & KRUEGER, L. E. (1984). Further evidence for priming in perceptual matching: Temporal, not spatial, separation enhances the fast-same effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 257-265.
14. COLLETT, T. S. (1992). Landmark learning and guidance in insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 337, 295-303.
15. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
16. CRONLY-DILLON, J. R., SUTHERLAND, N. S., & WOLFE, J. (1966). Intraretinal transfer of a learned visual shape discrimination in goldfish after section and regeneration of the optic nerve brachia. Experimental Neurology, 15, 455-462.
17. DESIMONE, R., & SCHEIN, S. J. (1987). Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: Sensitivity to stimulus form. Journal of Neurophysiology, 57, 835-868.
18. DILL, M., & FAHLE, M. (1997). The role of visual field position in pattern-discrimination learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 264, 1031-1036.
19. DILL, M., & HEISENBERG, M. (1995). Visual pattern memory without shape recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 349, 143-152.
20. DILL, M., WOLF, R., & HEISENBERG, M. (1993). Visual pattern recognition in Drosophila involves retinotopic matching. Nature, 365, 751-753.
21. EDELMAN, S. (1995). Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 207-220.
22. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
23. ELLIS, R., ALLPORT, D. A., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & COLLIS, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 775-796.
24. FAHLE, M. (1994). Human pattern recognition: Parallel processing and perceptual learning. Perception, 23, 411-427.
25. FAHLE, M., & EDELMAN, S. (1993). Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback. Vision Research, 33, 391-412.
26. FAHLE, M., EDELMAN, S., & POGGIO, T. (1995). Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity. Vision Research, 35, 3003-3013.
27. FARELL, B. (1985). "Same"-"different" judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
28. FIORENTINI, A., & BERARDI, N. (1981). Learning of grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 21, 1149-1158.
29. FISER, J., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1995). Size invariance in visual object priming of gray-scale images. Perception, 24, 741-748.
30. FÖLDIÁK, P. (1991). Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Computation, 3, 194-200.
31. FOSTER, D. H. (1978). Visual comparison of random-dot patterns: Evidence concerning a fixed visual association between features and feature relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 637-654.
32. FOSTER, D. H. (1984). Local and global computational factors in visual pattern recognition. In P. C. Dodwell & T. Caelli (Eds.), Figural synthesis (pp. 83-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. FOSTER, D. H. (1991). Operating on spatial relations. In R. J. Watt (Ed.), Pattern recognition by man and machine (pp. 50-68). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
34. FOSTER, D. H., & KAHN, J. I. (1985). Internal representations and operations in the visual comparison of transformed patterns: Effects of pattern point-inversion, positional symmetry, and separation. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 305-312.
35. FUJITA, I., TANAKA, K., ITO, M., & CHENG, K. (1992). Columns for visual features in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 360, 343-346.
36. FUKUSHIMA, K. (1980). Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 193-202.
37. GILBERT, C. D. (1994). Early perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 1195-1197.
38. HEISENBERG, M. (1995). Pattern recognition in insects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 475-481.
39. HUBEL, D. H., & WIESEL, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
40. IRWIN, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
41. IRWIN, J. R., & FRANCIS, M. A. (1995). Perception of simple and complex visual stimuli: Decision strategies and hemispheric differences in same-different judgments. Perception, 24, 787-809.
42. ITO, M., TAMURA, H., FUJITA, I., & TANAKA, K. (1995). Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 218-226.
43. JOLICOEUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
44. JÜTTNER, M., & RENTSCHLER, I. (1996). Reduced perceptual dimensionality in extrafoveal vision. Vision Research, 36, 1007-1022.
45. KAHN, J. I., & FOSTER, D. H. (1981). Visual comparison of rotated and reflected random-dot patterns as a function of their positional symmetry and separation in the field. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 155-166.
46. KAHN, J. I., & FOSTER, D. H. (1986). Horizontal-vertical structure in the visual comparison of rigidly transformed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 422-433.
47. KARNI, A., & SAGI, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 4966-4970.
48. KOBATAKE, E., & TANAKA, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivity to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 856-867.
49. KOLERS, P. A., DUCHNICKY, R. L., & SUNDSTROEM, G. (1985). Size in the visual processing effaces and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 726-751.
50. KORIAT, A., NORMAN, J., & KIMCHI, R. (1991). Recognition of rotated letters: Extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 444-457.
51. KRUEGER, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
52. KRUEGER, L. E. (1985). Effects of intermixed foveal and parafoveal presentation on same-different judgments: Evidence for a criterion-4 inertia model. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 266-271.
53. KRUEGER, L. E. (1986). Positive effect of heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 117-122.
54. KRUEGER, L. E., & ALLEN, P. A. (1987). Same-different judgments of foveal and parafoveal letter pairs by older adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 329-334.
55. KWAK, H.-W., DAGENBACH, D., & EGETH, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 473-480.
56. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., PAULS, J., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & POGGIO, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
57. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., PAULS, J., & POGGIO, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
58. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. MILLER, J. (1996). The sampling distribution of d'. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 65-72.
60. MYERS, R. E. (1955). Interocular transfer of pattern discrimination in cats following section of crossed optic fibers. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 48, 470-473.
61. NAZIR, T. A., & O'REGAN, J. K. (1990). Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system. Spatial Vision, 5, 81-100.
62. OLSHAUSEN, B. A., ANDERSON, C. H., & VAN ESSEN, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4700-4719.
63. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
64. PHILLIPS, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
65. POGGIO, T., FAHLE, M., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science, 256, 1018-1021.
66. PROCTOR, R. W. (1983). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
67. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1976). Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis. Nature, 262, 382-384.
68. RENTSCHLER, I., JÜTTNER, M., & CAELLI, T. (1994). Probabilistic analysis of human supervised learning and classification. Vision Research, 34, 669-687.
69. ROCK, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
70. ROLLS, E. T. (1992). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 335, 11-21.
71. SAOI, D., & TANNE, D, (1994). Perceptual learning: Learning to see. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 195-199.
72. SASLOW, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1030-1036.
73. SCHWARTZ, E. L., DESIMONE, R., ALBRIGHT, T. D., & GROSS, C. G. (1983). Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 80, 5776-5778.
74. SCHWEITZER, L. R. (1991). Binary-choice decision time depends upon cerebral hemisphere and nature of task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 73, 147-161.
75. SHEPARD, R. N., & METZLER, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
76. SHIU, L.-P., & PASHLER, H. (1992). Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 582-588.
77. STRASBURGER, H., HARVEY, L. O., JR., & RENTSCHLER, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495-508.
78. STRASBURGER, H., RENTSCHLER, I., & HARVEY, L. O. (1994). Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1583-1588.
79. TANAKA, K., SAITO, H.-A., FUKADA, Y., & MORIYA, M. (1991). Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 66, 170-189.
80. THOMPSON, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
81. TOVEE, M. J., ROLLS, E. T., & AZZOPARDI, P. (1994). Translation invariance in the responses to faces of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 1049-1060.
82. TROJE, N., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying pose: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
83. VIRSU, V., & ROVAMO, J. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 475-494.
84. WACHSMUTH, E., ORAM, M. W., & PERRETT, D. I. (1994). Recognition of objects and their component parts: Responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 509-522.
85. WEHNER, R. (1981). Spatial vision in arthropods. In H. Autrum (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 7 (Part 6, Section C. pp. 287-616). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.